Copy
May 2016 Bulletin: Applications
 
View this email in your browser
LANDFIRE APPLICATIONS

May 2016 Bulletin
In some ways, the name LANDFIRE can be misleading. The suite of tools, models and digital map layers -- the first complete, nationally consistent collection of resources with an ecological foundation -- are valuable resources for those working on fuels and fire-related land management issues, scenario planning and budgeting, of course. However, LANDFIRE models and spatial layers have been used in a vast array of conservation, natural resources, ecological, and land management applications that extend way "beyond fire."

This Bulletin highlights a few interesting applications that may prompt thoughtful, new approaches in your work. Enjoy.


 Because this is a long issue, we've used "LF" throughout to save space. Be sure to scroll to the bottom -- it's worth the T & E!
Forests, Fuels, Fire
South Park, Colorado. (c) Jeannie Patton
South Park, Colorado. -- Jeannie Patton

Assessments

Southern Appalachian Assessment used a LF EVT dataset to develop a "Forests Vitality Index" that supports forest management and reclamation activities, including watershed and water quality protection, soil erosion control, continuous yield of forest products, and multiple wildlife and recreational benefits. -- Jim

The Illinois Fire Council developed the state's fire needs assessment to promote and expand the use of prescribed fire. This is the first systematic report in Illinois to document the number of acres burned annually and identify how many need to burn in order to promote ecosystem health. It provides a call to action for land managers, legislators and the general public. Products used: BpS, EVT, and MFRI were foundational resources. -- Sarah

To quantify and identify priority areas for prescribed fire, the Wisconsin Fire Needs Assessment combines the information for fire dependent vegetation with additional spatial data sets to assess the benefits, effort, and challenges associated with using prescribed fire. LF data were used because they include both public and private lands; they are publicly available, making the methods easy to replicate for other states; and the assessment can be updated with future versions of LF data. Vegetation descriptions that included historical mean fire return intervals were an important part of the analysis. -- Sarah

Land Management

Prioritizing what to do where and when is a major challenge for land managers. The Nature Conservancy and Hiawatha National Forest are working to identify opportunities to both restore fire-dependent ecosystems and reduce wildfire risk in and around the Wildland Urban Interface. To do this assessment the team is using existing data from the Hiawatha and locally reviewed and adjusted LF BpS, S-Class and Fire Regime Condition Class datasets. -- Randy

In most of the western US, large fires are becoming more frequent, and fire size and percentage of high-severity fire is increasing. Prior to late 2015, no published studies directly compared fire statistics among federal land management agencies in the Sierra Nevada, Southern Cascades, and Modoc Plateau. In Differences in wildfires among ecoregions and land management agencies in the Sierra Nevada region, California, Brandon Collins compares fire stats for wildfires among ecoregions, forest types, and land management agencies 1984–2009. Link to video webinar. -- Jeannie

The 1990 National Indian Forest Resources Management Act established the only third-party review of federal forest management practices in the US on a ten-year basis. The emergence of LF in 2009 offered the opportunity to include a consistent and systematic view of forest condition for the third assessment in 2013 by the Indian Forest Management Assessment Team (IFMAT-III). Reports and associated materials are available on the Intertribal Timber Council websiteLF Vegetation Condition Class data were used to examine relative proportions of VCC1-3 lands by region and were combined with other data to examine forest condition trends. -- Henry

To best support tactical and strategic wildland fire management decisions, Birgit Peterson and others are developing a tool to incorporate Lidar 3D canopy structure data and LF data. The tool, Creating Hybrid Structure from LF/Lidar Combinations (CHISLIC), provides users the capability of generating a suite of improved vegetation structure and wildland fuel parameters. -- Julia

Data Applications/Modifications

LF data can be updated and modified to improve fire behavior, consumption and emissions estimates. In the short report Updating LANDFIRE Fuel Grids Using MTBS Fire Severity Data, Beauchaine and Blankenship document the process they used for updating LANDFIRE’s 2012 Fire Behavior Fuel Model 40 and associated spatial data layers to a reflect changes on the landscape resulting from four large fires in 2013 within the South Central Idaho Fire Planning Unit. -- Kori

In A Case Study Comparison of LANDFIRE Fuel Loading and Emissions Generation on a Mixed Conifer Forest in Northern Idaho, USA, Josh Hyde and others compare LF’s Fuels Characteristics Classification System and Fuel Loading Model spatial data layers to measured fuel loadings. The results indicate that there were differences between the mapped and measured fuel loadings and that these  differences translated into significantly different modeled rates of fuel consumption and emissions. -- Kori

Kurtis Nelson, Don Long, and Joel Connot discuss the LF 2010 data release and the consistency of the enhanced vegetation, fuel, and fire regime layers across the United States in the newly published LANDFIRE 2010—Updates to the national dataset to support improved fire and natural resource management open file report. Using landscape conditions from approximately 2010, the enhancements to the data products include refinement of urban areas and agricultural lands, and improved wetlands delineations.and fuel parameters. -- Julia

Food, Water, Climate, Birds, Collaboration
Reno, NV field work. (c) Jeannie Patton
Outdoor classroom in Reno, NV -- Jeannie Patton     
Food storage and LF?  Not your typical coupling, but recently Howey and Frederick (2016) published a paper, Immovable food storage facilities, knowledge, and landscape in non-sedentary societies: Perspectives from northern Michigan which does just that. Using the LANDFIRE Biophysical Settings (BpSs) data as context, the authors explored late pre-contact (ca. AD 1000/1100) food storage by hunter-gatherer societies in northern Michigan. -- Randy

The USFS's "Forests to Faucets" analysis identifies areas that supply surface drinking water, have consumer demand for this water, and are facing significant development threats—all important criteria for successful Payment for Watershed Services initiatives. LF data are used in the Wildfire Hazard Potential Map that indicates one of the water source threats used in the analysis. -- Jim

Wally Macfarlane et al. modeled the capacity of riverscapes to support beaver dams across the state of Utah in their recent article in Geomorphology. Their model used LF BpS/EVT to assess streambank vegetation conducive to foraging and dam building. The model reliably predicts where and at what densities beaver dams can be built and can be used to target areas for conservation/restoration using beaver dams. -- Jeannie

LF data were used to develop a greenhouse gas inventory regarding live carbon stock changes of California wildland ecosystems. The results of the study by Patrick Gonzales and others establish the beginning of a time series for the state greenhouse gas inventory and provide information on the role of forest conservation and management in California in mitigating global climate change.

LF vegetation cover maps play an important supporting role in a recent evaluation of how avian malaria and climate change may interact to further reduce future ranges for Hawaiian forest birds. In a study by Fortini et al. (USGS and USFWS). LF EVT data were used to evaluate habitat availability under future climate conditions within ranges estimated from species distribution models. -- Kim

In another avian application, Gnass Giese et al. used LF EVT to evaluate whether bird distributions across a wide range of sites in the Great Lakes region show a “human footprint.” The team demonstrates how bird survey data and land use information can be crafted into a bird-based index of ecological condition for the region, noting that while other datasets mapped vegetation at finer resolution, LF data were chosen because they were more current than some other sources, and were available across the entire study region. -- Kim

"Landscape Conservation Forecasting" techniques were combined with LF BpS and VDDT data to solve a collaboration dilemma ten years in the making. Watch a video and/or read a short feature story about how the Cherokee National Forest Landscape Restoration Initiative (CNFRI) developed a comprehensive set of restoration recommendations for the North Zone of the Cherokee National Forest. -- Jeannie
 
Find More LANDFIRE Applications
LANDFIRE's Web-Hosted Applications Map -- The WHAM!
Conservation Gateway The Nature Conservancy's LANDFIRE site updates and adds to the "Applications" pages on a regular basis. Summary Stories follow a template that provides names of projects/reports/studies, authors, short explanations and links/photos. And, the Gateway Library is a continual work in progress. WE WELCOME ADDITIONS TO THE LIBRARY!

Web-Hosted Applications Map (WHAM!) The TNC team is reviewing and updating the WHAM! When latest applications examples have been added, more than 120 "non-fire" stories, case studies, reports, links and photos will be available via the easy-to-use interactive map. Nearly 100 apps are currently listed on the WHAM!

The LANDFIRE website offers a few listings. Check the library as well.

Seventeen videos are posted in the "Applications" playlist on the LANDFIRE YouTube channel. We have many more to add, but what's there will get you started. Check the Conservation Gateway video page, too.

DO YOU HAVE AN APPLICATION STORY THAT OTHERS SHOULD KNOW ABOUT? WE WANT TO KNOW HOW LF WORKS FOR YOU, HOW TOOLS/DATA CAN BE MODIFIED, ADAPTED, APPLIED ACROSS THE COUNTRY -- YOU GET THE PICTURE! WRITE LANDFIRE@TNC.ORG and/or HELPDESK@LANDFIRE.GOV.
May/June Webinars
JFSP Series
May 3: Demystifying LANDFIRE’s Biophysical Settings Descriptions and Models in the Northern Rockies -- Jim Smith
May 10: LANDFIRE Update and Biophysical Settings Review: What it means to the Southern Rockies Region -- Jim Smith
May 12: LANDFIRE Update and Biophysical Settings Review: What it means to the Southeast -- Jim Smith
May 18: State Fire Needs Assessments and LANDFIRE: A Case Study -- Sarah Hagen
Info and registration


FBFM Guidebook-Database Series
May 12: South Central, 1 to 4pm Central
May 19: Southwest, noon to 3pm Mountain
May 26: Northwest, 11 to 2pm Pacific
June 2: North Central, 1 to 4pm Central
June 9: Northeast, 1 to 4pm Eastern

Info and registration

Reminder: June 30 Target for BpS Review/Update

More than 2500 BpS descriptions have been downloaded! Be sure to send your completed reviews in to us soon! Reviews received by June 30, 2016 will be used in the LF Remap process. Click on the BpS review website for info and contacts.

Contacts

Henry Bastian
DOI Business Lead
Frank Fay
USFS Business Lead
Don Long
FMI Technical Lead


LANDFIRE Helpdesk
LANDFIRE
LANDFIRE
Cons Gateway
Cons Gateway
Twitter
Twitter
Email
Email
The LANDFIRE Program is a cooperative agreement between the USDA Forest Service, agencies of the Department of the Interior, and The Nature Conservancy. In accordance with Federal law and U.S. Department of Agriculture policy, the Program is prohibited from discriminating on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability.
Click here to subscribe to LANDFIRE Bulletins & Post Cards
LANDFIRE Bulletin l Jeannie Patton l The Nature Conservancy l 2424 Spruce Street l Boulder, CO 80302
LANDFIRE@tnc.org

 Unsubscribe from this list      Forward to a friend     Follow us on Twitter
  Watch us on YouTube     Download PDF Bulletin