Greeting Readers

I hope you are all well and thriving. 

In this issue:
 1. The Purge. ...of Afrikan men
 2. Brexit - Don't count your chickens!

Introduction
As fast as I try to complete a newsletter the more I have to add to it in response to unfolding events.
Originally I had written a June issue dedicated to some internal problems amongst Afrikan people. Then with the Brexit result I received requests for an analysis of the implications of that potentially significant event. Just as I had completed that piece and booked a session to record the podcast, the high profile police executions of Alton Sterling and Philando Castile, followed by the killing of Police Officers in Dallas hit the headlines. In this issue I am going to say a few words about what is happening in the U.S with the sole purpose of contextualising these events rather than a blow by blow analysis of the individual events. I am also going to cover the fallout from the UK EU referendum result. This is going to be a long one, however these issues need more than light touch coverage.  
 
Before we get into the substantive issues just a quick word to let you know that I have uploaded an interview, as part of the Success Series,   with Dr Rhoda Molife. Dr Molife is an Oncologist and you can find the recording here (just scroll down the page)  http://blackfinancialfitness.com/media/ 
Dr Molife was educated in Afrika, the Caribbean and the UK and I think you will find her life story really interesting. I would definitely recommend that you get ambitious teenagers to listen to it.

The podcast of this newsletter is not up yet however you will be able to access it at the end of this month here:
http://blackfinancialfitness.com/media/

1. The Purge. ...of Afrikan men
OK, before we get into an explanation of current events I have to provide some historical context.

The Historical Context 
Ever since the creation of the United States of America in 1776, the Police, in whatever guise they operated, have always been at the forefront of oppressing Afrikan people and maintaining the White Supremacist status quo.  During the formal enslavement period every adult White male had a legal duty to apprehend and return any runaway Afrikan they came across.  Effectively every White male was deputised and we saw the contemporary manifestation of this with the murder of Trayvon Martin by George Zimmerman who hunted the teenager down.
We also have to be cognisant of the Dredd Scott ruling.

"Dred Scott was a slave whose owner, an army doctor, had spent time in Illinois, a free state, and Wisconsin, a free territory at the time of Scott’s residence. The Supreme Court was stacked in favor of the slave states. Five of the nine justices were from the South while another, Robert Grier of Pennsylvania, was staunchly pro-slavery. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney wrote the majority decision, which was issued on March 6, 1857. The court held that Scott was not free based on his residence in either Illinois or Wisconsin because he was not considered a person under the U.S. Constitution–in the opinion of the justices, black people were not considered citizens when the Constitution was drafted in 1787. According to Taney, Dred Scott was the property of his owner, and property could not be taken from a person without due process of law."  http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/dred-scott-decision 

This ruling was underpinned by the judicial philosophy of 'Original Intent' which Supreme Court Justices such as Clarence Thomas have closely identified with. Basically Chief Justice Taney, and his colleagues, held that Afrikan people, who had been imported int the USA as slaves, or were descendents of people imported as slaves, had no rights that a White man was bound to respect or guarantee. This ruling and others helped to codify into law the philosophical underpinnings of White Supremacy and reinforce the idea that Afrikans were non-people and ence that they could be assaulted and murdered without consequence.

THe US prison system was essentially created at the end of formal slavery to capture the newly 'emancipated' Afrikans. Just prior to the end of formal enslavement 50% of the US prison population was comprised of Afikans even though most Afrikan were enslaved at the time! As I have explained o you in a previous issue after the end of formal enslavement in 1863 a new period of re-enslavement began following the withdrawal of  Government troops from the Southern states in the Compromise of 1877. 

"The Compromise of 1877 was a purported informal, unwritten deal that settled the intensely disputed 1876 U.S. presidential election. It resulted in the national government pulling the last federal troops out of the South, and formally ended the Reconstruction Era. Through the Compromise, Republican Rutherford B. Hayes was awarded the White House over DemocratSamuel J. Tilden on the understanding that Hayes would remove the federal troops whose support was essential for the survival of Republican state governments in South Carolina, Floridaand Louisiana. The compromise involved Democrats who controlled the House of Representatives allowing the decision of the Electoral Commission to take effect. The outgoing president, Republican Ulysses S. Grant, removed the soldiers from Florida. As president, Hayes removed the remaining troops from South Carolina and Louisiana. As soon as the troops left, many white Republicans also left, and the "Redeemer" Democrats took control. They already dominated most other state governments in the South. What exactly happened is somewhat contested as the documentation is scanty.

Black Republicans felt betrayed as they lost power and were subject to discrimination and harassment to suppress their voting. At the turn of the 20th century, most Blacks were effectively disenfranchised by state legislatures in every southern state.^[1]" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compromise_of_1877 You can get similar information here http://www.history.com/topics/us-presidents/compromise-of-1877 where you can watch  short video onthe subject.

During the Reconstruction era Afrikans in the South (where the overwhelming majority lived) had made enormous educational, economic, political and social strides which incensed  the Whites who had very recently possessed them  property. Almost as soon as the US troops left the South the Democrats (yes the Democrats, for all of the historically ignorant Afrikans in America) ensured the reintroduction of a full blown White Supremacist Police terror state for Afrikans and as is described in the book 'Slavery by Another Name' by Douglas Blackmon, reintroduced chattel slavery, which lasted up until the end of the second European World War in 1945. Blackmon estimates that during this period around 150,000 Afrikans were re-enslaved to work in mines, mills, farms and other places of industrial production. 

One of the most interesting points to note was the role of the local Police (Sheriffs and Deputies) in this enslavement process and how stop and search/arrest was at the heart of the process. This is how it worked. 
Laws were introduced criminalising vagrancy. Local Sheriffs would stop unsuspecting Afrikans who were travelling around in search of work. They would ask them how much money the had on them. The answer would be little or none. They would then arrest them for vagrancy. They would lock them in the local jail before presenting them to the judge in the local court who was in on the deal. The managers of the local coal mine/steel mill etc. would have been alerted and would appear at court. The judge would find the Afrikans guilty of vagrancy and fine them. They could not pay the fine so they would have to go to jail. However the manager of the  local mine etc. would offer to pay the fine on the understanding that the Afrikans would be released into his custody to work off the fine. The financial circle was completed by the payment of bribes to the judge  and sheriff/deputies for their services. 

The Afrikans were taken to the mine etc. which was fenced off with armed guards in watch towers, just like in a contemporary US prisons and would never be seen again as the owners would charge them fees for filthy accommodation, disgusting food etc. such that the fine could never be paid off. The Afrikans would live out a terrible existence working in highly dangerous conditions and would generally die within a relatively short number of years, due to disease, workplace accident or at the hands of a fellow wretched slave.  Just like in the current US prison industrial complex where prisoners work for large corporations as slaves;  there was an epidemic of rape and sexual violence.  In fact it is estimated that the US is the only country in the world where more men are raped than women, due to its enormous and inhuman prison gulag system.

So you see how little has changed in 150 years. We essentially have the same interest groups working in cahoots to criminalise and incarcerate Afrikans (mainly men): Politicians, The Police, the Judiciary, The Prisons, Corporations all supported by the White Media and most of the wider white public.

The numbers
 
I always believe that it is important that I give readers information that allows them to make up their own minds. So below I have reproduced the figures relating to the killing of Afrikan people by the Police and the killing of Police by members of the general public (of all races). I will lead you to judge the validity of the claim that there is a war on the Police in the US which I at the heart of the 'Blue Live Matter' campaign.   
N.B. These figures were produced before the killing of Police Officers in Baton Rouge.

In 2015 the US Police killed at least 346 Afrikan people. To date in 2016 they have killed 160 Afrikan people.
In terms of police Officers killed in theline of the duty The Officer Down Memorial Page https://www.odmp.org/search/year provides the following figues 

Line of Duty Deaths: 62

9/11 related illness: 1 Aircraft accident: 1 Animal related: 1 Automobile accident: 9 Gunfire: 28 Gunfire (Accidental): 1 Heart attack: 4
Motorcycle accident: 3 Struck by vehicle: 2 Vehicle pursuit: 3 Vehicular assault: 9

By Month: January: 5 February: 10 March: 16 April: 2 May: 7 June: 11 July: 11

As you can see only 37 of these deaths ( Gunfire and Vehicular Assault) could be  categorised as being caused by a deliberate attempt to kill an officer. There were 47 such deaths in the whole of 2015.

If you go to the website http://mappingpoliceviolence.org/ you gt literally graphic breakdowns of killings of Black people by the Police. Here are some data sets that I think amply demonstrate that Police violence against Afrikans is not about crime prevention. 

So, a critical question that needs to be put and answered is 'why do Police Officers in the US keep on murdering Afrikan men?'. Now this is actually a very simple question to answer. The answer is ....because they can! It really is that simple. There are pretty much only two restraints or governors of human behaviour. One is internal and the other is external. The internal one relates to a person's morals, ethics and values. It is about what they believe to be right and wrong and how they act upon those beliefs in the real world. The external constraint is provided by the consequences which flow from a person's behaviour and this has two parts.
The first part is 'what is the likelihood of me getting caught in the act' of doing something that is prohibited. The second part of this external constraint is 'what will be the punishment if I get caught in the act'.
Therefore if a person sees nothing wrong with committing an act, through the lens of their personal morality, then the only thing that will prevent them from committing the act is (a) the likelihood of being caught, and (b) the severity of punishment that will be meted out. And let's be clear, a high likelihood of simply being caught is unlikely to deter the behaviour, especially if there is very little public disapproval attached to committing the act in question.

So, it is clear, from the evidence of the past 200 plus years, that a significant number of, mainly; but not exclusively, European Police Officers, in the US see nothing wrong with murdering Afrikan men. It is also clear that there is very little disapproval of these acts, amongst the majority European population, from the White media, from these murderous officers' colleagues and from their friends and family. Therefore, even though  the chances of getting 'caught' has increased, especially with the proliferation of smartphones with high quality video recording capability, that is not sufficient. If we move onto the question of punishment we see that being caught in the act is one thing, being charged is something else, being convicted is even more unlikely and being punished severely is almost unheard of. As an example in the case of the murder of Oscar Grant, who was shot in the chest whilst lying handcuffed on the floor, the murderer,  Johannes Mehserle, was not convicted of murder, but rather involuntary manslaughter, the lowest form of manslaughter and was out of prison in 11 months. Meanwhile his white supporters raised over a $1,000,000 for him to ensure he would have a comfortable life as a semi-retired race soldier who had made his bones. Remember the murder was committed and recorded in a public place, the Oakland transit system, with lots of witnesses. You can read about Mehserle's penchant for violence against Afrikans here https://www.rt.com/usa/johannes-mehserle-carrethers-grant-079/
The foregoing analysis provides a clear explanation of why these acts will continue unless and until we can ensure that there are severe negative consequences associated with Police Officers murdering Afrikan men in the US. Marching and protesting never has and never will change anything. Until some form of negative consequence can be associated with these acts, for the perpetrators and their  supporters, these acts will continue. See the graphic below for a clear illustration.


By my reckoning the graphic tells us that there was a  0.6% conviction rate in 2015 for these killer cops and I bet you that neither of the two officers convicted spent very long in prison. 

http://mappingpoliceviolence.org/ 

It is important to note that overwhelmingly the Afrikan men that these race soldier police murderers target are invariably poor and down on their luck. That should be a clear indicator to you as to why we need to address our parlous socio-economic condition. If you watch predators in the wild they nearly always seek out the most vulnerable in the herd, such as the newborn, old or infirmed. If they attack a strong bull it will be in large numbers when the bull is isolated. It's the same with the Police, they attack the most economically weak group of people in the United States. As an aside, I am still waiting to hear all the 'forgive, forgive, forgive' talk emanating from the families of the Police officers slain in Dallas. Of course we all know we won't hear it. Meanwhile some of the partners and family members of the most recently murdered Afrikan men have already started with the 'It's not about race' crap. A sure sign of a Negro looking for a payout before their 'loved one' is even cold in the ground.

The real life Purge
The reason this section was entitled 'The Purge' is because that is exactly what it is. To purge is to eliminate unwanted waste material, e.g. From one's body. Just like in the film of the same name, where all laws are suspended from 7pm until 7am for one night a year to allow people to vent their repressed anger and rage, these murders by the Police are a vicarious way for White society in the US to vent their deepseated  hatred towards Afrikan men. The only difference between the film and contemporary US society is that in the film the purge lasted 12 hours once a year, whereas in the U.S. 'The Purge' of Afrikan men is 365 and a quarter days a year.

Finally, you need to understand the role of the corporate media and why they always put the Afrikan victim on trial. If you recall Associated Press went to court to force the release of Trayvon Martin's juvenile record to try to defame his character whilst studiously avoiding investigating his murderer, George Zimmerman's long history of run ins with the police domestic violence against his ex-wife and ex-girlfriend, violence against the father o a former partner and allegations of child sexual abuse made by his younger cousin. Similarly there is no investigation into the background of these killer cops just an all out media assault on the victim. That's why you can never remember the names of the killer cops. Things change and yet stay the same, unless and until we do something about it, and that something is not singing Kum by ya and asking 'can't we all just get along'.

What is the solution?
The above two quotes pretty much sum up  what it is all about. There is no appeal to morality or fellowship that will solve this problem. The only answer is to build a community that has the power to inflict economic damage upon those who target us. Dr Claud Anderson has described this extensively for us so there is no need for me to go over his suggestions in detail, save to once again remind you of the five levels of building a strong community that he describes:

Level 1 - Build an Economy
Level 2 - Gain control of Politicians (Rent, Lease or Buy)
Level 3 - Gain Influence over the Court System (so called Criminal Justice System) 
Level 4 - Develop your own Media
Level 5 - Education

As with building a house you concentrate on laying strong foundations i.e. an economy and build upwards from there. That is why I have developed http://blackfinancialfitness.com as part of my contribution to this process. Your job is to wok you how you can contribute to our economic development wherever you live and to share this message of economic empowerment.


2. Brexit - Don't count your chickens!

So the votes are in and I have been asked, advised and instructed by some of my readers that I should provide an analysis of the aftermath and implications of the UK referendum result.
Just in case it had not come to your attention; there was a small majority (52% to 48%) of people who voted in favour of the UK leaving the EU in the referendum held on the 23rd June. I voted for Brexit - only the second time I have ever voted in my life - as I had indicated in the May newsletter. I won't rehearse my reasons for doing so as you can go back and read that issue, but rather will focus on the fallout from the vote. 
As things have worked out I am glad that I have waited some weeks to produce this issue as there have been some very interesting developments since the 23rd which have confirmed in my mind why I was correct to vote for Brexit.

It's the poor and uneducated wot done it!
At present I have what one would describe as a portfolio career. That is to say I don't have a job, but earn money from a variety of different types of work. This type of career gives me the opportunity to interact with a lot of highly educated (in the accredited sense) well paid, mainly 'liberal' individuals. What has been remarkably consistent, has been, firstly; the utter shock and devastation of most of these people at the referendum result. Secondly; the barely concealed and sometimes openly stated assumptions about those people who voted for Brexit, and thirdly; the unquestioned assumption that I voted for Remain! 
In terms of the second point, it was clear that the overwhelming majority of the people to whom I am referring (to date I have only met three people who voted for Brexit in these settings) assumed that people who voted for Brexit were: poor; uneducated; racist; fearful and generally uninformed. In order to allow people to share their views openly I have not disclosed that I voted Brexit, but rather have listened carefully to the views of these Remainers. What is interesting is that none of them actually asked me how I voted; so strong was their assumptions about the type of person who would support Brexit. 
The shocked reaction of this group of people to the result was also instructive' as it almost completely mirrored the reaction of the BBC and corporate media from whom my sample group had obviously obtained their pro-Remain talking points. It just goes to show the complete disconnect between the corporate media and large swathes of the British population. The EU has always been a political project masquerading as an economic projec and there is absolutely no need for much of its bureaucracy in order for nation states to trade with each other in a trading bloc.
 Anti EU sentiments across Europe - There has been a pretence in the corporate media in recent years that there is something peculiarly Euro-sceptic about the British (or perhaps more accurately given the referendum results, English and Welsh publics) however this is simply not the case. As the graph below depicts there are a number of EU countries in which only a minorty of people have a positive view of the EU and as you will see there are actually less French people with a positive view of the EU than amongst the British. Even Germany which is the economic and political powerhouse of the EU and which has benefitted greatly from the Euro, which is much weaker than an independent German currency would be - thus aiding German exporters - has only half of its population with a positive view of the EU. 

The graph and table below depict the same survey results, on EU favourability, amongst a sample of EU member states, in two different formats. As you can see the UK is by no means the only country where there is significant scepticism about the EU. The French results are very interesting, as since its inception the EEC and now EU has built around a Franco German axis. If France left the EU the European political integration game would be well and truly up. 



The table below shows the overall combined results across the sample nations and as you can see it would be reasonable to suggest that large numbers of people across the EU are not entirely sold on its current functioning.




http://www.pewglobal.org/2016/06/07/euroskepticism-beyond-brexit/ 

The reality, which we will touch on later, is that the EU elites are terrified of the British referendum result emboldening other populations across Europe to seek their own referenda, many of which would be closely fought and could also lead to Exit votes, thus leading to the slow and messy unravelling of the EU.

 The Referendum is only 'advisory' and the stupid people can be made to vote the 'correct way' 
It is important to note that the UK's EU referendum was, in legal terms, advisory and not binding upon the UK government. This is important because, although the Conservative government had committed to respecting the results of the referendum, whatever the outcome, prior to the vote, this is now being used as a 'get out of Brexit jail card' by both ordinary UK subjects experiencing a serious case of sour grapes and hypocrisy as well as members of the political elite who give lip service to notions such as democracy, but really have contempt for the 'ignorant masses' or 'useless eaters' as George W Bush would call them, who voted for Brexit.
Firstly we had the ridiculous on line petition, organised by a Remain campaign organiser, calling for a second referendum with the provision that the result should only be binding if their was at least a 60% vote either way and a 75% turnout (the referendum turnout was 72%). The disingenuous and hypocritical nature of this petition was highlighted by the fact that very few of these people who organised and supported this petition:
i. Were seeking such stringent conditions prior to the referendum, especially during the Remain surge in the polls following the murder of MP Jo Cox and the subsequent not so subtle use of this sad event by the corporate media to push the Remain agenda.
ii. Were questioning the legitimacy of the Conservative government that called the referendum and were put into power with a parliamentary majority on the back of around a 40% share of the vote and a 62% turnout!

The test of a principle is whether it applies in a variety of of situations and circumstances. So, for example if you are against house burglary you should not only be against someone burglarising your home, but you should also be against you perpetrating a burglary against someone else. Similarly, we need to ask if the referendum result had been 52% Remain and 48% Brexit, would these petitioners have been supportive of a poll for another referendum using the same rationale as they have employed. I think we all know the answer. This is a classic British request for best out of three when you lose the first toss of the coin.
The importance of this petition and its mischief is that it set the scene for Remain politicians to commence the insidious campaign to encourage parliament to either (a) set aside the referendum results, or (b) organise another referendum much closer to the actual point of Exit, which is currently mooted as December 2018. 

One of the first out of the gate was Labour Party MP, David Lammy, exhorting Parliament to 'end this madness' and to vote to ignore the referendum result.

An article in the Independent newspapers highlighted a statement on Mr Lammy's Twitter feed which said:
"Wake up. We do not have to do this.
We can stop this madness and bring this nightmare to an end through a vote in Parliament. Our sovereign Parliament needs to now vote on whether we should exit the EU."

Will Worley 25 June 2016 

A bit later we had Count Dracula himself, Tony Blair, highlighting that it would take a long time for Britain to exit the EU - he hopes - and that the referendum was not necessarily "the settled will of the British population". 
For those people outside the UK, or for those of you in the UK who are not aware, there is a legal process and then a negotiated process to Britain leaving the EU. The clear strategy of the Remain political elite is to stretch out the leaving process for as long as possible, to allow their economic elite friends/paymasters the maximum time to create instability in order to frighten the British population into recanting their vote for Brexit and calling for another referendum, when they would ensure that the economy was in a nose dive which could only be halted by staying in the EU and 'creating the conditions for market confidence and stability.'
The first and legal stage of Britain leaving the EU is for the sitting Prime Minister, to trigger Article 50 of the EU constitution. In lay person's terms this is a bit like giving notice to quit. Following this there would be an agreed period to negotiate the actual exit, which would involve negotiations on trade, migration/freedom of movement of people etc. 
The first point to note is that the U.K.'s former Prime Minister David Cameron refused to trigger Article 50 immediately on the flimsy pretext that it is a task for the next Prime Minister (at the time Cameron was supposed to be stepping down in September). Straight away he added 3 months to the Brexit process. Since i started writing this issue, Theresa May has become the leader of the Conservative Party and hence Prime Minister of the UK and she as made it clear that she would like to engage in pre-negotiations before triggering Article 50 at the end of this year. This now means the the earliest date for Britan leaving the EU is likely to be December 2018. They say a week is a long time in politics so imaging all the mischief that those who want to overturn the referendum result can get up to in two and a half years! Mark my words, Brexit is by no means assured. To give Ms May her due she has made it very clear that she accepts the referendum vote and a appointed a pro-Brexit minister, David Davies, to lead on the process.
   
The above two quotes by Phillip Schultz, President of the European Parliament  demonstrate, firstly the contempt the EU elite have for the populations of the member states and secondly their fear that a British exit could lead to the unraveling of the EU. 

  Scotland - Itching to join the Euro prison
 It seems that some people learn nothing from experience and the Scottish people who voted strongly for Remain, seemed destined to eventually leave the UK and the join the EU (if it still exists by then). They will then have to take the Euro a their currency and will find themselves subject to looting and economic rape like the PIGS (Portugal, Italy, Greece and Spain). The Euro is a prison for the prison and the European Central Bank can turn off the Euro tap whenever it wants to enforce Banker Occupation by an EU member state. The Scots really need to be careful what they ask for.    
 By the if you want to know where the danger signs are for the EU, its Italy which has a number of insolvent banks that the Italian government wants to bail out. On a global level watch out for Deutsche Bank, which looks very much like Lehman Brothers did leading up to the last economic crash.   

 Why the EU countries won't cut off their trades noses to spite their faces

There has been much talk in the press, both during and after the referendum from the Remain supporters about the importance of the UK's 'trade' with other EU countries, but not so many references to the specifics of this trade relationship.
I did a quick internet search found the following article by Larry Elliot, the Guardian's economics editor, which is headlined:

UK trade deficit with EU hits new record

Gap between exports and imports in the first three months of 2016 widened by £0.7bn to nearly £24bn

The article goes on to note that:

"Britain’s trade deficit with other European Union countries is running at a record high level ahead of the referendum next month, official figures show.

The latest healthcheck from the Office for National Statistics on goods coming in and going out of the UK reveal that the gap between exports and imports in the first three months of 2016 widened by £0.7bn to £23.9bn.

Trade has become an issue in the referendum campaign, with the leave camp saying that the size of the UK’s deficit will encourage other EU countries to grant Britain continued access to the European single market in the event of a Brexit vote on 23 June."
Tuesday 10 May 2016 19.22 BST

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/may/10/uk-trade-deficit-hits-new-record-of-24bn-pounds-eu-referendum-brexit 

The point made by the leave campaigners regarding the incentive for the EU countries to continue to grant the UK access to the European single market due to the size of this trade deficit, is well made and reinforced by the size of the UK trade deficit with Germany, the undisputed economic powerhouse of the EU. The following article provides you with the numbers.

UK deficit widens as Brits can't get enough of those German goods

"The love affair between David Cameron and Angela Merkel might be souring, but us Brits can't get enough of German goods - the UK has just recorded its largest ever trade deficit with Germany. Germany has long been our largest trading partner, both in terms of exports and imports. But between August and September increased by £200m taking it to an all-time high of £4.9bn."
http://www.cityam.com/1415361850/uk-deficit-widens-brits-cant-get-enough-those-german-goods
Friday 7 November 2014 12:27pm

The above article also highlights the UK's top ten import and export partners. If you check out these figures you will see that the UK has a trade deficit with every one of its top import countries except the Irish Republic.

If you want to know why export oriented Germany loves the Euro, a currency it shares with many much weaker economies such as the PIGS (Portugal, Italy, Greece and Spain), you have to understand that the Euro gives Germany an artificially weak currency which makes its exports cheaper.  The article below highlights the remarkable trading success of Germany:  

Remarkably, Germany has not posted an annual goods trade deficit in any year since 1951 — see Destatis chart below.

Destatis, the federal statistics office, reported Tuesday that the German foreign trade balance showed a surplus of €247.8bn in 2015, which was the highest value ever recorded. It exceeded the previous year's peak of €213.6bn. In 2013, the surplus of the foreign trade balance had been €197.6bn.

http://www.finfacts.ie/Irish_finance_news/articleDetail.php?Germany-s-record-trade-surplus-in-2015-US-UK-France-in-deficit-520 

I hope the foregoing three articles have highlighted to you just why there is no no incentive and a very real disincentive for the EU member states to impose a punitive  trade agreement with the UK, if and when it exits the EU. As they say 'follow the money' and always ask the question 'who benefits'.

Conclusion
The killing of the Police in Dallas was an inevitable reaction to hundreds of years of state sponsored or supported violence against Afrikans in the US. It was not a question of if, but when. THe Police violence won't stop and has not stopped. There has been the killing of an Afrikan man, Alva Braziel, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PC3gduW-2g4  in Houston with video footage showing that he had his arms up at the time, contradicting the lies of the killer cop who said he was pointing a gun when shot. The youtube video link provides a comparison of the treatment of Mr Braziel and a European man, Keith Swainson, who fired shots at Police and yet was not shot and was arrested! Of course, there will be no questioning of  the White population as to whether they support the violence against Afrikans. President Obama won't describe these murders as 'despicable' and I just want to make the point that Obama has not been conscripted to White Supremacy he is a Volunteer!

If you like what we do share the newsletter with sane Afrikans. 

Keep on keeping on.


Ifayomi
'It's time to win'
http://blackfinancialfitness.com

http://houseofknowledge.org.uk/newsite