Copy
Baluns - to have or not to have.
View this email in your browser

Baluns: what are they and do you need one?

The word balun is a short form of BALanced to UNbalanced transformer. The full name gives a clue to what it does. To understand it fully we need to understand what in means in the context of antenna systems.

Antennas and similarly feeders can be either balanced or unbalanced. The IEEE Standard Dictionary of Electrical and Electronics Terms suggests;  "Balanced" signifies electrically alike and symmetrical with respect to ground or arranged to provide conjugate conductors between certain sets of terminals. (4) Pertaining to a relationship between two or more objects that are alike or symmetrical in some respect."

Taking this definition we can see that a horizontal dipole is a balanced antenna, equally a doublet or a square loop could be described as a balanced antenna. The reality is that all antennas are, to some extent, unbalanced. Maybe your horizontal dipole slopes a bit, or perhaps one end is near a tree while the other is near your house, in either case the antenna will not be perfectly balanced. It might be close to balanced however.

We will most likely connect our transceiver to the antenna using a feed line of some sort. Feedline can also be balanced or unbalanced. Co-axial cable is unbalanced (not symmetrical) whereas open wire line is balanced.

We should be interested in what happens if we feed a balanced antenna with an unbalanced line. A common example of this feeding a horizontal dipole or inverted vee, with co-axial cable. In this case, inside the co-ax, all is well. The problem lies on the outside of the cable. The mismatch between the balanced antenna and the unbalanced cable allows an RF current to flow on the outside of the co-ax. Basically the shield of the co-ax becomes part of your antenna system. [Ref: W8JI]

But does this really matter?

It depends... there are several potential problems that can occur when your feedline is radiating due to feeding a balanced antenna with an unbalanced feeder:
  • If you use SSB, the consequence of feedline radiation can be RF feedback (giving rise to distorted transmissions) - in severe cases you can even get RF burns from your microphone [been there - done that!].
  • If you use datamodes, RF is more likely to get into your computer causing it to crash.
  • If you are setting up a trapped dipole, common-mode currents can make the antenna very hard to adjust.
  • Noise can be another problem. If the outer of your feedline is part of your antenna system, it can pick up noise along the way making your antenna appear noisy on receive.
  • The reverse effect is that when you are transmitting, the potential for interference to equipment near your feeder run is increased as your feeder radiates from the outside.
  • In the case of directional antennas, the antenna radiation pattern may be degraded. This degradation may mean that the radiation pattern is no longer symmetrical. Nulls, such as those off the back of a Moxon antenna, might be less pronounced than you would expect. Even the antenna gain might be slightly reduced.
That being said, there are circumstances were these common mode current effects are not really a problem. Low power CW or SSB operators using simple dipole antennas in electrically quiet areas (such as on mountain tops) will most likely not be troubled by these effects. Of course, most radio operating is not done in such favourable circumstances.
 
The answer to the potential problems of common mode currents is a balun. A balun reduces common mode currents that can exist on your feedline. Some balun designs are a lot better than others at doing this. [Ref: G3TXQ]. The "balun of first resort" used by radio amateurs is often a few turns of co-ax at the feedpoint of the balanced antenna. This is a "solution" that I have never seen used on a professional HF radio station. The reason is, that it is often only marginally effective and its performance is hard to quantify: sometimes it works, and sometimes it doesn't. Such a balun is usually self-resonant in the HF band so it works well across a limited range of frequencies and hardly at all elsewhere.

A better design of 1:1 balun makes use of a transmission line wound around a ferrite core. This type of balun presents a high impedance (e.g. > 1000 Ohms) to common mode currents across a wide range of frequencies - easily across a decade (e.g. 3 MHz to 30 MHz). It gives predictable and repeatable performance, both highly desirable characteristics.

Making a balun is straightforward. The Yankee Clipper Contest Club has a useful Powerpoint that shows the process of making a high power balun of the type found on professional HF antennas.

Want to know more? The classic paper on baluns by Roy Lewellan is here.
 
With best wishes for 2016

73 Richard G3CWI

 
A review of the SOTABEAMS Picotuner antenna coupler
Peter VK3YE has done a nice review video of the new Pico Tuner. It's providing to be a popular kit for use with end-fed half-wave antennas.
Click the photo above to see his video or click here to visit the product page.
Also be sure to check out Peter's book "Minimum QRP".

New Products @SOTABEAMS


Our new Pico Balun is proving popular. It's a complete feed-point solution for your antenna with either a high performance 1:1 balun or a 4:1 matching transformer.

As an introductory offer, save 15% on the Pico Balun by using the coupon code PICO15. Code valid until 30 January 2016.



As usual, I have lots more ideas for products so keep checking the website!

WWW.SOTABEAMS.COM

73 Richard G3CWI
Facebook
Facebook
Twitter
Twitter
Website
Website
Copyright © 2016 SOTABEAMS, All rights reserved.


unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences