Copy
View this email in your browser

Vascular Surgery Evidence Update

5th May 2016

To access full text you may have to log in to your NHS Athens account (click here to register for free). If full text is not available then please email us to request a copy.
Do you have any research needs? Please do contact your Vascular Surgery Librarian, Keith Nockels for any information and research assistance. Keith can be contacted directly on 0116 258 5558 or via email at: keith.nockels@uhl-tr.nhs.uk
Updated: Venous thromboembolism in adults: diagnosis and management

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
 
New and Updated Cochrane Systematic Reviews

Phlebotonics for venous insufficiency
Authors' conclusions: Moderate-quality evidence shows that phlebotonics may have beneficial effects on oedema and on some signs and symptoms related to CVI such as trophic disorders, cramps, restless legs, swelling and paraesthesia when compared with placebo but can produce more adverse effects. Phlebotonics showed no differences compared with placebo in ulcer healing. Additional high-quality RCTs focused on clinically important outcomes are needed to improve the evidence base.

Anticoagulants (extended duration) for prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair
Authors' conclusions: Moderate quality evidence suggests extended-duration anticoagulants to prevent VTE should be considered for people undergoing hip replacement surgery, although the benefit should be weighed against the increased risk of minor bleeding. Further studies are needed to better understand the association between VTE and extended-duration oral anticoagulants in relation to knee replacement and hip fracture repair, as well as outcomes such as distal and proximal DVT, reoperation, wound infection and healing.

Vascular closure devices for femoral arterial puncture site haemostasis
Authors' conclusions: For time to haemostasis, studies comparing collagen-based VCDs and extrinsic compression were too heterogeneous to be combined. However, both metal clip-based and suture-based VCDs were associated with reduced time to haemostasis when compared with extrinsic compression. For time to mobilisation, studies comparing VCDs with extrinsic compression were too heterogeneous to be combined. No difference was demonstrated in the incidence of vascular injury or mortality when VCDs were compared with extrinsic compression. No difference was demonstrated in the efficacy or safety of VCDs with different mechanisms of action. Further work is necessary to evaluate the efficacy of devices currently in use and to compare these with one other and extrinsic compression with respect to clearly defined outcome measures.

Revascularisation of the left subclavian artery for thoracic endovascular aortic repair
Authors' conclusions: High quality RCT evidence for or against routine or selective revascularisation of the LSA in TEVAR is not currently available. It is not possible to draw conclusions with regard to the optimal management of LSA coverage in TEVAR, and whether routine revascularisation, which was defined as the intervention of interest in our review, confers beneficial effects, as indicated by reduced mortality, cerebrovascular events, and spinal cord ischaemia. This review highlights the need for continued research to provide RCT evidence and define the role of LSA revascularisation in the context of TEVAR with coverage of the LSA.

Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach for elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
Authors' conclusions: Very low quality evidence from four small RCTs indicates that the RP approach did not have advantages over the TP approach for elective open AAA repair in terms of mortality. Moreover, the RP approach may increase the risk of postoperative wound complications although the CIs were wide.

Low quality evidence shows that the RP approach could reduce blood loss, hospital stay and ICU stay compared with the TP approach. Very low quality evidence shows no differences between the RP approach and TP approaches in aortic cross-clamp time and operating time.

Further large-scale RCTs of the RP approach versus TP approach for elective open AAA repair are required.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis for nonorthopedic surgical patients
Updated 2016 Apr 20 04:10:00 PM: AWMF-Leitlinie Prophylaxe der venösen Thromboembolie [German guideline] (AWMF 2015 Oct 15) view update
 
Other Good Quality Systematic Reviews

Systematic review of the complications following isolated calf deep vein thrombosis

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Endovascular versus Open Repair of Asymptomatic Popliteal Artery Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ultrasound Guided Compression Versus Ultrasound Guided Thrombin Injection for the Treatment of Post-Catheterization Femoral Pseudoaneurysms: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

Presenting Baseline Coagulation of Infra Renal Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis

Percutaneous access for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Fate of Distal False Aneurysms Complicating Internal Carotid Artery Dissection: A Systematic Review

Covered vs Uncovered Stents for Aortoiliac and Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Application of autologous platelet-rich plasma to enhance wound healing after lower limb revascularization: A case series and literature review

The Use of Arteriovenous Fistulae as an Adjunct to Peripheral Arterial Bypass: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
 
Table of Contents

Annals of Vascular Surgery
The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Research
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Vascular & Endovascular Surgery
Vascular Medicine
Vascular Pharmacology
Our mailing address is: keith.nockels@uhl-tr.nhs.uk
 
Copyright © 2016 UHL Clinical Librarian Service, All rights reserved.
Share
Tweet
Forward






This email was sent to <<Email Address>>
why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences
UHL Clinical Librarian Service · Education Centre · Glenfield Hospital · Leicester, LE3 9QP · United Kingdom

Email Marketing Powered by MailChimp