Copy
Search engine
View this email in your browser
Episode 13 | Brad Katsuyama, Steven Einhorn
Forward
Share
Tweet
This Week on Wall Street
Markets rally on Greece deal, strong start to earnings season

Stocks rallied this week on the back of a solid start to earnings season and a long-awaited resolution between Greece and its European creditors. The S&P 500 jumped 2.4%, the Dow rose 1.8% and the Nasdaq continued to outperform with a 4.3% climb. The tech-heavy index is now up 10% for the year versus 1.5% for the Dow.

Energy was the worst performing sector amid fears the agreed-upon Iran nuclear deal, which lifts economic sanctions, could further flood the oil market with excess supply. Risk assets surged to start the week after weekend negotiations yielded the framework for a bailout package for Greece, while safe haven assets like US treasuries initially declined. However, bond prices rebounded by the end of the week, with the 10-year US treasury yield finishing 0.6% lower at 2.34%. The US dollar appreciated 1.6% while the Euro dropped below $1.09.

Greece

Facing economic ruin, Greece ultimately blinked and capitulated to Germany, agreeing to harsh austerity measures in exchange for a rescue package closely resembling the rejected referendum proposal. While the perception is that creditors "prevailed," the ordeal could have irreparably damaged the collective psyche of the Euro zone experiment amid suggestions austerity is strangling European economies.

Despite infighting within Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras’ far-left Syriza party, the bailout deal was ultimately ratified with a 229-64-6 vote in Greek parliament. Tsipras responded by jettisoning party rebels from his governing coalition. With a deal in place, Greece is expected to receive a 86 billion euro cash infusion, with the ECB raising the banks’ Emergency Liquidity Assistance (ELA) access by 900 million euros, which will allow them to re-open this week.

While the deal allays near-term fears of a 'Grexit,' many view it as simply a short-term fix to a situation likely to rear its ugly head again in the near future. By the end of negotiations, Germany appeared most concerned about making an example of Greece as a warning to its larger Euro zone colleagues who may seek to elect populist regimes and pursue debt relief - even after the IMF broke ranks by declaring Greek debt unsustainable without a sizable haircut. Yields on 10-year Italian and Spanish bonds fell below 2% in the aftermath of the deal.

Asia

Chinese markets continued their wild ride amid extreme government measures designed to end the sharp sell-off. From an economic perspective, China allayed fears about an economic “hard landing” with a Q2 GDP reading of 7.0% against median expectations of 6.8%. China's debt, however, is growing faster than its economy, and is now twice the size of GDP.

On Friday, the Shanghai and Shenzen Composite Indexes rallied 3.5% and 5%, respectively, with the latter representing the largest rally since 2012. Friday’s gains erased prior weekly declines, and were triggered by news the government-backed China Securities Finance Corp. has up to 3 trillion yuan ($483 billion) available to support stocks. Concerns, however, persist about the long-term implications of heavy-handed government intervention.

Earnings season

Earnings season got off to a relatively strong start, especially in the technology sector, considering the tepid expectations for this quarter. Thanks largely to a stronger dollar, aggregate earnings are expected to fall 3.7% from the year-ago quarter, according to FactSet.  

On Friday, Google (GOOGL) recorded the largest one-day increase in market capitalization in history thanks to an earnings report that handily topped expectations. The tech giant has recently taken steps to behave more like a mature conglomerate, with an increasing focus on managing costs, but proved it still has growth engines humming as ad revenue grew 11%. The stock, after lagging the market and trading in a range for the past two years, spiked more than 16% to all-time highs.

Earlier in the week, Netflix (NFLX) rallied more than 15% after another impressive earnings report, while Intel (INTC) initially surged after an earnings beat before giving back all gains by week’s end.

The financial sector enjoyed a strong start to earnings season, with JP Morgan (JPM), Bank of America (BAC) and Citigroup (C) all handily beating expectations and staging impressive rallies. The big winners for the week were BAC and C, which each gained around 7.5%, while JPM has led the charge over the past six months with a 26% gain. US Bancorp (USB) only reported narrow beat but rallied nearly 6% for the week while Wells Fargo (WFC) and PNC (PNC) climbed nearly 4% after a narrow miss and beat, respectively. GS initially declined after a mediocre report, but still managed to eke out a 1.4% weekly gain.

Notable transport stocks reporting earnings were Kansas City Southern (KSU), which rallied 6.5% after a narrow beat, and JB Hunt (JBHT) which was basically unchanged after a narrow miss. Within the industrials sector Honeywell (HON) rallied 1.9% after topping estimates while General Electric (GE) gained 0.7% after an in-line report.

Economic data

CPI matched expectations with a 0.3% increase in June, with a 3.4% gain in gas prices accounting for a large portion of the increase. Core CPI (which excludes food and energy) also came in-line with expectations of a 0.2% increase.

Housing starts increased 9.8% in June, beating expectations, with multifamily construction rising 29.4% to record the largest monthly tally since 1988. US home-builder confidence hit its highest level in nearly a decade.

June core retail sales fell 0.1%, breaking an impressive three-month run. The University of Michigan's Consumer Sentiment Index declined to 93.3 versus expectations of 96.1, potentially reflecting rising gas prices and anxiety about the situation in Greece.

While data was somewhat mixed, there was nothing to derail the Fed’s rate hike calendar. In Congressional testimony Wednesday, Federal Reserve Chairman Janet Yellen noted signs of economic improvement and hinted the FOMC is likely to increase rates later in the year if the trend continues.

Week ahead

  • Monday: Notable earnings – Halliburton (HAL), Morgan Stanley (MS); IBM (IBM)
  • Tuesday: Notable earnings – Verizon (VZ), Baker Hughes (BHI); Apple (AAPL), Microsoft (MSFT)
  • Wednesday: US existing home sales, Notable earnings – American Express (AXP)
  • Thursday: China flash manufacturing PMI, Notable earnings – Caterpillar (CAT), Eli Lilly (LLY), McDonalds (MCD); AT&T (T), Visa (V)
  • Friday: EU flash composite PMI, US new home sales, Notable earnings – Biogen (BIIB)
Episode Playback
Brad Katsuyama discusses high-frequency trading (HFT)
Did you miss Sunday's show featuring Brad Katsuyama and Steven Einhorn? Watch all segments, extended interviews and web extras at WallStreetWeek.com 
Investment Primer
What is high-frequency trading (HFT)?
In Episode 13, Brad Katsuyama discusses high-frequency trading (HFT) and market structure, so we put together an overview of HFT and financial regulation relating to execution and exchanges. This week's primer is the first part of the comprehensive Guide to HFT, while the Episode Feature goes into further detail.
 
What is high-frequency trading (HFT)?

High-frequency trading (HFT) essentially describes any trade execution performed electronically at a rapid rate of speed. However, while HFT is broadly demonized, only certain types of HFT have wreaked havoc on modern financial market structure. The line between algorithmic trading, electronic market making and predatory HFT is blurry, and the term HFT often gets used to describe most electronic execution. The reality is that HFT is neither inherently good nor bad, but the devil is in the details. 

To understand the spectrum of HFT, it’s valuable to clarify different types of market participation.
  • What is algorithmic/systematic trading?
    • Algorithmic/systematic trading is the broad term for a system that is programmed to use some type of mathematical model to autonomously execute trades. A human programs a strategy into a computer based on a given criteria, and the computer runs the system from there.
    • HFT is a type of algorithmic trading, but not all algorithmic trading should be considered HFT
  • What is manual/discretionary trading?
    • Manual/discretionary trading is the broad term for a human making subjective decisions to execute trades, typically based on a set of subjective criteria. A manual trader could be a retail investor placing one trade per month, a professional day trader making several hundred trades a day, or a large institution buying large quanities of shares on various time-frames.

The CFTC acknowledged in 2011 it does not “purport to have a perfect definition” for HFT, but proposed a “seven-part test for what constitutes HFT”:
  1. The use of extraordinarily high-speed order submission/cancellation/modification systems with speeds in excess of five milliseconds or generally very close to minimal latency of a trade
  2. The use of computer programs or algorithms for automated decision making where order initiation, generating, routing, and execution are determined by the system without human direction for each individual trade or order
  3. The use of co-location services, direct market access, or individual data feeds offered by exchanges and others to minimize network and other types of latencies
  4. Very short time-frames for establishing and liquidating positions
  5. High daily portfolio turnover and/or a high order-to-trade ratio intraday
  6. The submission of numerous orders that are cancelled immediately or within milliseconds after submission
  7. Ending the trading day in as close to a flat position as possible (not carrying significant, un-hedged positions overnight)

How the stock market works

The stock market was created so that companies could gain access to public investor capital in order to finance faster growth. Stock market exchanges are intended to be places where natural buyers and natural sellers come together to transact in an orderly fashion. However, over the course of its history the stock market has become increasingly fragmented and complicated by the introduction of intermediaries.

Today there are 11 public stock exchanges, around 50 Alternative Trading Systems (ATS) (aka “dark pools”) and around 200 internalizers (which are typically broker-dealers who may sell/buy stock from/for their own book) where trades get executed. The most prominent public exchanges are the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and NASDAQ. Public exchanges are highly regulated while ATS, which are typically run by large banks and financial institutions, are less regulated.

When you place an order into your online brokerage account your order can be routed to a particular exchange or ATS. After placing a market order you will almost instantaneously see a trade execution confirmation, but what you don’t see are all the hands touching the order over the course of milliseconds.

Scrutinized HFT strategies

Following the Flash Crash in May 2010, the SEC sought to collect more information on several types of HFT strategies that could be harmful to the market.
  1. Passive market making
    1. Passive market-making primarily consists of placing bids and offers (limit orders) to provide liquidity to the market. Profits are derived from buying at the bid and selling at the offer to capture liquidity rebates offered in the maker-taker model.
    2. Regulators are concerned about the quality of the liquidity HFT passive market making supposedly provides. Because of the bad incentives of the maker-taker model, there is heavy layering of the order book and high, rapid cancellation rates of 90% or more.
  2. Arbitrage
    1. Arbitrage strategies seek to profit from pricing inefficiencies on the same asset across different marketplaces. Arbitrage will always exist in financial markets, but should not exist based on speed incentives from exchanges across related markets.
      1. Statistical arbitrage (“stat arb”) is the practice of exploiting pricing differentials between correlated securities and markets. Statistical arbitrage can be applied over any time-frame using mathematical modeling techniques.
      2. Latency arbitrage is the practice of exploiting a technology speed advantage. Latency describes the time that elapses from the moment a signal is sent to the moment it is received. The main disconnect when discussing the difference between non-predatory HFT and predatory HFT is confusion about the difference between statistical and latency arbitrage.
  3. Structural
    1. Structural strategies most purely look to exploit market structure inefficiencies by obtaining fastest delivery of market data through server co-location and direct data feeds. With access to the fastest quote information, firms could look to prey on executions from market participants accessing slower feeds.
  4. Directional
    1. Directional strategies look to profit from the anticipation of directional movement in securities prices, unlike the prior three mentioned strategies which do not take unhedged risk.
      1. Order anticipation directional strategies look to identify and get ahead of large orders that may affect price, while using those orders as free options (exit points) in case the security’s price does not move in the anticipated direction.
      2. Momentum ignition strategies involve a firm submitting a series of orders in an attempt to ignite a rapid directional price movement. This concept, called “spoofing,” tricks algorithms and manual traders into buying or selling aggressively. Momentum ignition strategies may also look to trigger existing stop-loss orders to ignite further price movement. Spoofing is illegal, but hard to identify and prove.

Read the entire Guide to High-Frequency Trading (HFT)

Have more questions about high-frequency trading? Email us at prosper@wallstreetweek.com
Episode Feature
High-frequency trading (HFT): a story of bad incentives and unintended consequences
Guide to HFT continued

What is Regulation National Market Structure (Reg NMS)?

Regulation National Market Structure (Reg NMS) is a set of rules and regulations passed by the SEC in 2005-2007 designed to modernize US exchanges by improving fairness in price execution, displaying of quotes and access to market data.

The most important provisions of Reg NMS are:
  1. Order Protection Rule: ensures investors receive the best possible execution price on a security across all exchanges. The rule was designed protect investors from existing “trade-through rules” that allowed for disadvantageous executions, especially on limit orders. The intentions of the rule were good, but its unintended consequences have harmed market structure.
  2. Access Rule: This rule gave birth to a system called the Securities Information Processor (SIP), which is basically the aggregation of quotes across all public exchanges to create a universal National Best Bid and Offer (NBBO) for every security. Data feeds from all the data centers of the exchanges into one central processor, which then spits out a universal spread. Regulators created this rule in order to tackle what they saw as ill effects of increasing fragmentation of public exchanges, but instead it exacerbated fragmentation and flight to dark pools.

Unintended consequences of the Order Protection Rule

An institution executing a large order may want to execute on a dark pool, in order to prevent showing its hand prior to executing the trade. A stock’s spread consists of the highest bid (to buy) and the lowest offer (to sell). If you put in a market order to buy 200 shares of stock, you will be paired with the lowest offer (assuming the offer is for at least 200 shares) and your full order will be executed at that price.

But what if you want to buy 1,000 or 10,000 shares? As size increases, the rule increasingly becomes a problem. Say, for example, you want to buy 1,000 shares, but the lowest offer on the “inside market” consists of 100 shares. In this example, let’s say those 100 shares are for sale (on the offer) at $10.10, 1,000 shares are displayed for sale just above that at $10.11, and then the next displayed offer isn’t sits at $10.15 for 900 shares.

If you enter a market order for 1,000 shares, you are forced to first get filled at the “best price,” which is the 100 shares at $10.10. Once that order gets filled the exchange where the trade took place reports a “print” (executed transaction confirmation) for 100 shares at $10.10. You would then hope to get filled on the rest of your order by taking 900 shares from the 1,000 share offer at $10.11, but often it doesn’t play out that way.

Once the 100 share print at $10.10 is disclosed to the market, a fast computer can pull away that 1,000 offer at $10.11, and then your order will automatically move up to take the next best offer, which sits for 900 shares at $10.15. Your average buy price on that trade is $10.145. The problem is the inability to access the $10.11 offer after sweeping the $10.10 offer without first signaling intent to the marketplace.

For the small-time individual investor, the slippage may not make a significant cost difference, but for large institutions, which include pension and mutual funds into which most Americans contribute, consistently higher average prices can have a massive financial impact over time.

Why dark pools exist

Dark pools have grown in relevance arguably because of economic incentives resulting from faulty regulation. Dark pools began in the 1980s when large institutional investors sought to conduct transactions with one another away from the fees and prying eyes of public exchanges. When possible, they wanted to be able to buy and sell large blocks of shares without showing their hand on public exchanges – and thus potentially getting better average execution prices.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) laid the groundwork for the current market structure in 1998 with the implementation of Regulation Alternative Trading System (Reg ATS) in 1998, and then created additional issues with the passage Reg NMS in 2007.

Flight to dark pools

Public exchanges with greater transparency are generally referred to as “lit markets” while more opaque ATS and dark pools are generally referred to as “dark markets.” The scenario we described above is one major reason why we have seen an increasing flight to “dark markets,” especially by large institutional investors.

In 2005, prior to the implementation of Reg NMS, dark pools only made up 3-5% of volume in the market. Today that number is around 15-18% on most days and continues to grow. Approximately 40% of volume is Trade Reporting Facility (TRF) volume, which comprises all of “off-exchange trading”, including ATS volume, “upstairs” trading (which involves manual traders negotiating directly with each other to execute large trades) and retail order flow. In addition, Tabb Group estimates high-frequency trading (HFT) accounts for 54% of the derivatives markets.

Why? Just to reemphasize, in dark pools large institutions can trade anonymously and disguise unwinding of large positions. The flight to dark markets has had a detrimental effect on overall genuine price discovery. Broker-dealers and bulge brackets banks, seeing the effects of the new regulation, scrambled to set up dark pools to entice order flow from large institutions.

Now, rather than being a place for natural buyers and sellers to meet as stocks exchanges were originally intended to be, they have become, for some institutions, liquidity venues of last resort . While 60% of volume still takes place on lit markets, exchanges have become toxic because of the type of order flow that is attracted to the maker-taker (and the inverted taker-maker) rebate system. While there is the appearance of deep liquidity today in public exchanges, the reality is they are becomingly more sparse and fragile.

Read the entire Guide to High-Frequency Trading (HFT)
Week Links
Greece surrenders, Google soars
China
 
Memo to China: You Are Doomed to Fail (WSJ, Jason Zweig)
 
China market-tracking ETFs roiled by share suspensions (FT, Josh Noble)
 
Europe
 
French comeback exposes rift in Eurozone core (FT, Daniela Schwarzer)
 
Greece—time to look on the bright side (Medium, Dan Davies)
 
Economy
 
Capital Spending Forecast 2015-2106: Good Reason for Optimism (Forbes, Bill Conerly)
 
Economists See U.S. Strong Enough to Withstand Global Risks (WSJ, Kathleen Madigan)
 
Financial industry

PIMCO Releases Asset Allocation Strategies for ‘New Neutral’ (ThinkAdvisor, Danielle Andrus)

Vanguard’s white-hot ‘hybrid robo’ just added $4 bilion in three months – a heat that may cast a chill on ‘pure’ robos (RIABiz, Lisa Shidler)

Buybacks
 
High Conviction Buybacks (Investor’s Field Guide, Patrick O’Shaugnessy)
 
How stock buybacks have become Wall Street’s new drug (MarketWatch, Wallace Witkowski)
 
Potpourri
 
The Really Big One: An earthquake will destroy a sizable portion of the coastal Northwest. The question is when. (The New Yorker, Kathryn Schulz)
 
El Chapo Escapes Again (2015) and The Hunt for El Chapo (2014) (The New Yorker, Patrick Radden Keefe)
Socialize with us
Facebook
Facebook
Twitter
Twitter
Instagram
Instagram
SoundCloud
SoundCloud
YouTube
YouTube
Tumblr
Tumblr
Website
Website
Email
Email
Copyright © 2015 SkyBridge Insights, All rights reserved.


unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences