|
|
[ ^ ]
1: Freedom from Want
All the gold ever mined will fit in a cube 21m square.
Image: Rock Eel Digital
The Four Freedoms highlighted in the Independence Day 2015 Issue are really four dimensions of the same freedom: freedom from tyranny.
While the human experience of civilization spans some 12K+ years ( K = thousands), how we understand it in context is so often in fits & starts. So many of us are quick to seize on an interpretation which allows us the false luxury of not thinking for ourselves.
The preamble to the US Declaration of Independence declares that we as persons have inalienable rights, " life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." Our first freedom then, must be the freedom to be born, never subject to be butchered and sold piecemeal to purchase a sports car.
Gordon Childe, perhaps one of the most impactful archaeologists of the 19th Century (1800-1900), wove the theory of the Neolithic Revolution from his contemporaries' hodge-podge of facts & opinions. As a Marxist, he fell prey to the same false sense of urgency that taints today's progressive do-gooders: the hunger for personal significance, evidenced by their devotion to radical change.
Just like juveniles in their teen years, these perpetual juveniles are often heedless of the harm wrought by their insatiable, ego-driven craving for drastic change. Thomas Sowell quotes Eric Hoffer:
“People who are fulfilled in their own lives and careers are not the ones attracted to mass movements: 'A man is likely to mind his own business when it is worth minding,' Hoffer said. 'When it is not, he takes his mind off his own meaningless affairs by minding other people’s business.'” Thomas Sowell, Capitalism magazine
As so aptly described by Christina Hoff Sommers, who brings this more to mind than the AOF: the always offended feminist? Our own BonnieRobin will take up this challenge in article 2: "Exploding Maslow's Pyramid."
Interested in more detail?
Reach out to us [ 1, 2] to schedule an intro call. Our dialog-driven risk discovery model makes real work fun to accomplish.
[ ^ ]
|
|
|
[ ^ ]
2: Exploding Maslow's Pyramid
BonnieRobin Mariela Watau
» Share & Subscribe
Image: Rock Eel Digital
The Ground Rules
Whoever owns the ground, makes the rules. That's your elevator pitch summary for Richard Epstein's classic Takings, covering the unconstitutional encroachment on private property in the US.
Like Epstein, to discover and resolve the residual risks in your operations, you'll need " a thorough, unrelenting, all-guns-blazing attack on the received wisdom…" just like Takings did within the the law community.
[ ^ ]
Making money is vital, it's moral, it's fun. So now that we've got that out of the way, are you just here to make money or do you want to really succeed and make a difference? (Remember rule 1: Why let the good interfere with achieving the great?)
It's ok to succeed. It's even ok to succeed at more than one thing. Don't hate me because I'm beautiful… or thin, or fit, or all those NSFW things my husband says about me(!).
No, no, Nanette. Don't hate at all. In You're Born an Original – Don't Die a Copy John Mason tells us hate does more damage to the vessel in which it's stored that the object on which it's poured.
If you're still at the foothills of the mountain, or even still climbing out of the surf, where you think hate has any positive aspects to it, then hate me because I say things with such crystal clarity that just reading them makes you realize – to become the best version of yourself – you've got some growing up to do.
You want to just make money or you want to really make a difference?
If that conflicts with your current worldview, then it's time to pick up your marbles and find a new sandbox to play in…
One where your worldview and the way you think "things should work" doesn't conflict with the laws of physics, otherwise known as natural law.
Why pick on Honest Abe?
[ ^ ]
|
|
The Exhausted West speech: Alexander Solzhenitsyn, at Harvard's Tercentenary Theatre on 8 June 1978
What Solzhenitsyn retaught in AD 1978 is the same message that Pope Leo the Great taught in AD 450!
[Exploding Maslow's Pyramid includes text from multiple previous issues of Perspectives, with each authors' permission.]
[ ^ ]
|
|
“There is a disaster, however, that has already been under way for quite some time. I am referring to the calamity of a despiritualized and irreligious humanistic consciousness. Of such consciousness man is the touchstone, in judging everything on earth.
Imperfect man, who is never free of pride, self-interest, envy, vanity, and dozens of other defects. We are now experiencing the consequences of mistakes that were not noticed at the beginning of the journey.
On the way from the Renaissance to our day we have enriched our experience, but we have lost the concept of a Supreme Complete Entity, which used to restrain our passions and our irresponsibility.
We have placed too much hope in political and social reforms, only to find that we were being deprived of our most precious possession: our spiritual life.”
[ ^ ]
|
|
|
[ ^ ]
3: Palimpsest: What 5 essential traits does an ancient practice us tell about modern leadership?
Recycling is more than just paper & plastic
Image: Wikimedia Commons
Forbes columnist John Tamny comments that " No one reads the same book" meaning we all come away from the same experience with our individual impressions. Yet in the case of a palimpsest, he's even more right than may be obvious on the surface.
[ ^ ]
In the middle ages, when parchment (created from sheepskins) was expensive and scarce, scribes reused old parchments thus unintentionally often saving the underlying text for modern eyes.
This overwritten document is called a palimpsest [ 1, 2, 3].
What leadership lessons can we learn from these rewritten scrolls?
A legitimate question, deserving of a legitimate answer.
1) Question so-called received wisdom, before automatically accepting things at face value. As Will Rogers made famous: "it's not what ya know, it's what ya know that just ain't so!"
2) The underlying message may still be there, yet the current message, the one where we add exponential value to our companies', sports teams', social organizations' and our families, is the story we present to the world. By learning and applying the lesson that leaders know: intellect drives the will which tames the emotions, we and those in our charge get to experience greater trust, dependability and healthy relationships. Who would be satisfied with less than that?
3) Emotionally motivated people are typically not deep thinkers. John Maxwell says they are more like ice cubes (which melt away quickly) than icebergs (where 9⁄ 10th are below the surface). Issues of complexity in our modern world are solved by people who have embraced the dichotomy of The Cloud Of Unknowing and the sustained, deep thinking that embraces the level of detail required to truly address the situation without getting lost in it.
4) In another analogy, they can shift their focus to see both the forest and the trees. These rare birds have married the best aspects of systems thinking & systems engineering. On Matt's culture blog: Quantum potes tantum aude (Dare to do as much as you can), his charter quote reads: Systems Thinking teaches us how to scale our perspective to study the forest or the trees, while Systems Engineering tells us what to do with the data we find.
Reuse:
At the heart of any effective movement is POP = plain old practicality. Frugality and abundance are secure playmates not strange bedfellows. To shepherd assets entrusted to us means that we think beyond our own selfish wants of the moment, yes or yes?
Husbandry has nothing to do with a wedding ceremony, it's a one-word shorthand for the New England rhyme: "Use it up, wear it out. Make it do or do without." To make the AOF cringe even more, every one of us who have as much brains as God gave gravel should husband our resources: waste not, want not.
Rewrite:
5) People can 'overwrite' lessons they've been given, so that they can transcend the silliness of the current 'common knowledge' to reach deeper into the core of real leadership. This advice to study the masses and do the opposite has a long heritage. George Drysdale's Logic and Utility, in the chapter on Fallacies of Confusion, (p. 109) made this point in 1866!
Pope Paul VI foretold the crumbling of society's foundations in his encyclical Humanæ Vitæ in 1968 only to have the advice ignored by willfully blind intellectuals and then starkly confirmed by researchers. [ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
In the largest longitudinal study of its kind, Wallerstein reports on the Unexpected Legacy of Divorce: long-lasting damage that divorce causes to both children and spouses. Research by Whitaker et al., American Journal of Public Health, May 2007, reports that over 70% of non-reciprocal domestic violence is instigated by women in heterosexual relationships, contrary to the AOF mantra.
[ ^ ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|