Copy
If you have any suggestions for content, or wish to be added to our direct mailing list please contact: LibraryUpdates@nice.org.uk
NICE Evidence Search
Contact
Forward
Tweet
Share

March 2017

In this issue of the bulletin:
PsycINFO thesaurus in ProQuest
Combining in ProQuest and EBSCO
CKS topic updates
NICE Conference

PsycINFO thesaurus in ProQuest

We've had reports of some issues when searching the ProQuest databases via HDAS. These have been reported to ProQuest and investigated, with the following outcomes:

Reported issue: unexpected numbers of results when exploding terms in the PsycINFO thesaurus.
We've had some reports that exploding a thesaurus term brings back fewer results than just searching for the term - when we would expect exploding to bring back more results. One example is the term EATING DISORDERS.
Explanation from ProQuest: PsycINFO includes a classification field as well as a subject heading field, and some of the classification terms are the same as the subject headings (EATING DISORDERS is one example of a term that is used in both fields). When we send a request to search on a subject heading, ProQuest picks the term up from both the subject heading and classification fields (this is based on their own user research, in that users want to find any records that have been labelled with this term, regardless of what field the term is in). This means that for certain terms, there will be a larger number of records found, if the term is in both fields.
When we send a request to explode a subject heading, however, the request is treated differently. When exploding a term in the PsycINFO thesaurus, each heading is assigned a unique code; narrower (child) terms are also given the same code. So when the request to explode a term is sent, it is converted to the code number, and only returns results that include that code.  
The classification field is not given this code, so any results that only have the term in the classification field are not included in the search.  
This is why sometimes exploding a subject term brings back fewer results than just searching using the term.
Resolution: a request has been raised within ProQuest to investigate changing the way that thesaurus searching works so that classification terms are not included. We will update you when we know the outcome of this request.

Reported issue: irrelevant results from exploding some PsycINFO thesaurus terms
We've had a couple of reports that some terms (such as Alcohol intoxication) in the PsycINFO thesaurus are retrieving completely irrelevant results when they are exploded.
Response from ProQuest: this has been raised as high priority bug to be investigated and resolved.
Resolution: we will let you know when we've had confirmation from ProQuest that this has been resolved.

Back to top

Combining terms in ProQuest and EBSCO databases

Reported issue: combining terms - ProQuest and EBSCO
We've had some reports that different sets of results are retrieved if you carry out separate searches on 2 or more terms and then combine them, than if you combine your search terms in one row, eg:
1. (yoga).ti,ab                                 3074
2. ("back pain").ti,ab                      36532
3. (1 and 2)                                     143
4. (yoga AND "back pain").ti,ab    142
Explanation from the database providers: This is expected behaviour. Individual searches for (yoga).ti,ab and ("back pain").ti,ab will bring back results where the terms back pain or yoga are in either the title or in the abstract. Searching for (yoga and "back pain").ti,ab will bring back documents that have both back pain and yoga in the title field, or have both terms in the abstract field. The query is being translated as (TI("back pain") AND TI(yoga)) OR (AB("back pain") AND AB(yoga)).
In this example, one record returned in row 3 has the term back pain in the title, and the term yoga in the abstract.  This record isn't found in row 4, because the terms are not found in the same field.
Resolution: if you want to make sure you're retrieving all relevant records, you should consider searching for terms individually and then combining. Or you can run them as one search row, for eg (("back pain").ti OR ("back pain").ab) AND ((yoga).ti OR (yoga).ab), which you can then apply limits to. 

Back to top

CKS topic updates

NICE Clinical Knowledge Summaries (CKS) topics are aimed at healthcare professionals working in primary and first contact care in the UK. The 350 topics cover 1000 clinical presentations or patient scenarios and are free to access.
The following CKS topics have been updated over the past three months:

December 2016

 
January 2017  
February 2017  
The following topics will be updated and available from the start of April 2017: Back to top
NICE Conference 2017

The NICE Conference is taking place in Liverpool from 18-19 May, to discuss the challenges being faced by the health and care sector.  The core themes this year are innovation, access and transformation. For more information, and to register, please see the conference website.

Back to top.
Share
Tweet
Forward
Visit NICE Evidence search | Contact us | Previous issues
Copyright © 2017 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you have subscribed to the Library Bulletin.

Our mailing address is:
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
Level 1A City Tower
Piccadilly Plaza
Manchester, M1 4BT 
United Kingdom

Unsubscribe from this list    Update subscription preferences