Copy
Market update from Ten Capital
View this email in your browser

Weekly Commentary

As of Friday, September 23rd, 2016

 

 

What’s in a Number?


SUMMARY
  • Equity markets rebounded strongly from last week’s declines with the S&P 500 finishing the week up 1.23% and international equities (EAFE) up 3.08%
     
  • Fixed income markets also experienced healthy gains this week with investment grade bonds up 0.38% and high yield up 1.02%.
     
  • The Fed Decision – The probability of the next Fed rate hike coming by the end of the year rose to over 60% following this week’s FOMC statement in which 14 of the 17 voting members decided to leave rates unchanged. The 3 dissenting votes were in favor of raising rates anywhere from 0.25-0.50 basis points. While the committee recognized that the case for rising rates had strengthened it decided to hold off from a hike, most likely not wanting to create any political impacts on the impending presidential election. It is now likely that we see the first and only rate hike of the year in December. 
     
  • The Bank of Japan Decision – Japan’s central bank kept rates steady at its meeting on Wednesday but did introduce some new changes to its policy approach in its latest attempt to boost prices and economic growth. The BOJ announced they will make yield-curve control the primary focus of its new policy framework and outlined their plan to purchase 10-year Japan government bonds, keeping the yield around zero percent. They also revised their consumer price index (CPI) target to 2%.
     
  • German Elections – Merkel’s CDU party suffered in the most recent regional election as people turn more to the country’s anti-immigrant “Alternative for Germany” party. As a result she came up with a statement on getting tougher on immigration, which should have interesting ramifications for the upcoming “Brexit” negotiations with the U.K. 
     
  • Commentary: More often than not people at or nearing retirement have been told to find their “number”, but what exactly does that mean? Please join Jake in this week’s Beyond the Portfolio piece in which he covers why sometimes finding your “number” doesn’t necessarily prepare you for retirement and why finding your income stream may hold the answers. 

MARKET RECAP

THE FACTS

Positive data this week included:
  • Unemployment Claims – Initial claims for unemployment benefits dropped to its lowest level since July, falling by 8,000 week over week to a level of 252,000. Economists say few layoffs alongside steady hiring rates implies that solid payroll employment growth lies ahead. Continuing claims also fell by 36,000 to 2.1 million.
     
  • Homebuilder Sentiment – the NAHB Housing Market Index rose to 65 vs. 59 in August. Anything above 50 indicates optimism amongst builders in their outlook.

Disappointing data this week included:
  • Existing Home Sales - Sales of previously owned homes fell for a second month in August as inventory of homes for sale continued to shrink. Existing home sales declined 0.9% in August, which is only 0.8% higher than one year ago. With inventories tightening we have seen pressure on home prices sending them higher. The median sales price is now $240,000, 5.1% higher than one year ago.
     
  • Housing Starts – Starts fell by 5.4% in August, with building permits also dropping by 0.4%. The biggest weakness in starts came from single-family homes which dropped 6.0%. One positive is permit growth for single-family homes did increase by 3.7%, a key indicator of future housing demand.  
Our Take

by Tim Mitrovich

The big news this week was of course the Fed’s decision to hold their interest rate at 0.25%, along with their strong indication that the market should expect them to raise rates before the end of the year. The market cheered this news, which is especially encouraging given Yellen’s specific statement that the market should expect another hike this year. Hopefully, we can move past the myopic focus on The Fed for the rest of year, and get back to more fundamentally driven markets.

While recent economic data has been mixed, I am encouraged by a few of the recent points that have come out. 

First, the level of investor bearishness remains extremely high which is usually a great contra-indicator. The current level of bulls is under 25% which is the lowest since Brexit, and bearishness is at its highest since February 11th, which you may recall marked the low point so far this year for the market.

Secondly, it appears that some of the weak data from August may have been just a temporary anomaly, as recent PMI data (measures production) on the regional level is signaling improved strength. RenMac research has calculated that the surveys are consistent with a jump from 49.4 in August to 51.7 for September. Recall that 50.0 is the line between contraction and expansion.

Finally, yesterday’s release of Leading Indicators (LEI) for the month of August showed a ratio in relation to Coincident Indicators (CEI) that looking at historical data would indicate that a recession is still some time out. A analytic report from Bespoke showed how this ratio has been a fairly solid indicator in the past of the likelihood of impending recessions, and while this ratio has weakened it has yet to show the significant decline seen before previous recessions (see chart below). 

Short of some geopolitical event the markets should have support if third quarter earnings meet expectations.
Commentary: What’s in a number?

“Part of solving the retirement mystery is deciding how to handle your retirement money and create a retirement income.” – unknown

We often go through life complaining that we’re treated like a number rather than a living breathing human being.  Yet when it comes to classic retirement planning we are all too often told that in order to be “retirement ready” we need to calculate and embrace a retirement number that we can call our own.

Remember this ING commercial?

Here’s why focusing strictly on your “number” is a terrible way to look at retirement planning and completely useless on many levels.
  • First: the numbers in ads like the one you see above and in certain “best-selling” retirement books are, more often than not, designed to sell products and create anxiety and uncertainty rather than educate you.
     
  • Second: most of the calculations that determine your “number” are based on very basic assumptions that ignore key factors that drive your individual financial security during retirement.
     
  • Third: the very idea that you can somehow pinpoint a specific number that will be relevant 20, 30 or even 40 years down the road is naïve at best and catastrophic at worst.
If you remember my commentary from a few months back titled, It’s Not Just Data You Need, It’s Information, this is exactly what I was talking about.

So why do so many have this absurd obsession with a concrete number?  It’s due in large part to the mindset of the financial services industry and its marketing efforts wherein many brokers, planners and insurance agents are paid to deliver hard and fast numbers, without taking the time to do any real retirement planning.  Plus, being able to point to a specific number makes it easier for some in the industry to inflate your needs, scare you to the point of paralysis, and all too often, sell more product.

THE ALTERNATIVE: Instead of fixating on the size of the nest egg you’ll need in retirement, focus on your retirement income needs because let’s be honest, when it comes to investing for retirement, income should always be the primary goal.  You don’t invest to accumulate a nest egg bigger than your neighbors (or at least you shouldn’t), you invest to create a diversified portfolio that will generate a consistent, repeatable, tax efficient income stream that will last a lifetime regardless of market cycles and volatility.  

You might be saying, “Well that’s great, but how do I determine what my retirement income stream needs to be?”  Great question.  Let’s start by imagining you’re retired today (if you aren’t already) and calculate how much money you would need to live comfortably assuming your mortgage was paid off and all your dependents were out of the house and on their own.  That number, your annual income needs number, is the starting point.  

(1) ANNUAL INCOME NEED

Now offset that number with your expected social security, pension, rental or any other income sources you plan on having available in retirement outside your investment portfolio.  Are you with me so far?  The next step is to look at your annual income needs minus what you will receive in any of the above-mentioned other income sources and conduct a gap analysis.  

(1) ANNUAL INCOME NEEDS – (2) OTHER INCOME SOURCES = (3) GAP

In other words, what is the “gap” between your retirement benefits/outside income sources and your estimated retirement income needs?  Once we know the gap, we can determine the best investment portfolio allocation to create the retirement income to close that gap.

(3) GAP = (4) PORTFOLIO RETIREMENT INCOME

It’s that simple, and by simple I’m talking about determining the retirement income you will need to create from your portfolio.  It’s a whole other story to create a diversified portfolio that can meet those income needs with the appropriate allocation and risk profile.  That’s where we can help.

Now, if you still feel that you absolutely must have a “number” to aim for, try this.  Multiply your annual income needed after all offsets by 25.  

EXAMPLE: annual income needed = $40,000
$40,000 x 25 = $1,000,000


That will at least give you a realistic retirement portfolio value to begin determining your portfolio income needs.

CONCLUSION:  Here’s the bottom line.  When it comes to being truly retirement ready, you need to spend some time determining ALL sources of income and if you have a gap.  If you have one, conduct a gap analysis or better yet, let us do one for you.

Retirement readiness doesn’t have to be daunting, just spend more time calculating your financial choices and decisions, and less time calculating your number.


I hope you have a wonderful weekend.


Jake and the Team at Ten Capital
Share
Tweet
Forward
Share
The information provided herein by Ten Capital is being provided for informational purposes only.  

Ten Capital may gather information and data contained herein from third parties that it deems to be reliable, however, no guarantee, representation or warranty is given by Ten Capital regarding the accuracy, completeness, suitability or validity of any information that are sourced from third parties.  The information contained herein is not, and shall not constitute an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or an offer to purchase any securities, nor should it be deemed to be an offer, or a solicitation of an offer, to purchase or sell any investment product or service. The information contained in this email is based on our own opinions and experiences and should not be construed as professional investment advice.  

Any ideas or strategies discussed herein should not be undertaken by any individual without prior consultation with a financial professional for the purpose of assessing whether the ideas or strategies that are discussed are suitable to you based on your own personal financial objectives, needs and risk tolerance.  Ten Capital expressly disclaims any liability or loss incurred by any person who acts on the information, ideas or strategies discussed herein.   Any reference to a particular stock’s past or potential performance is not, and should not be construed as, a recommendation or guarantee of a particular outcome. The provision of any investment advisory services by Ten Capital shall only be made pursuant to an executed advisory agreement between Ten Capital and its clients.
Copyright © 2016 Ten Capital, All rights reserved.


Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp