|
|
Carey King Research Newsletter - January 2017:
Happy New Year!
Three items for this newsletter:
(1) a podcast on energy in the economy,
(2) UT Austin Energy Institute's Full Cost of Cost of Electricity Study. was launched (and see new journal paper and online calculators comparing the cost of power generation)!
(3), an op-ed on the Dakota Access pipeline as a "power struggle", and
FIRST, ENERGY TRANSITION SHOW PODCAST, I was interviewed late in 2016 by Chris Nelder for his Energy Transition Show. Chris and I discuss ideas related to the role of energy in the economy: decoupling (or lack thereof), energy intensity, net energy, and decarbonization.
Click here for a summary of the podcast discussion and a list of time points in the podcast when certain topics arise (including discussion of implications of reaching the cheapest energy and food starting about at 24:10 minutes).
Link directly to podcast: http://energytransitionshow.com/episode-32-resources-and-economy/
|
|
THIRD, OP-ED ON "POWER STRUGGLE", is an December 8, 2016 opinion editorial I wrote in December that made it to print in many of the major Texas newspapers. The topic was the protest regarding the Dakota Access Pipeline in North Dakota.
Austin American Statesman version: Pipeline, Standing Rock, Conflict is all about Power
Also versions printed in the Houston Chronicle and Dallas Morning News
"The recent decision by the President Barack Obama’s Administration, via the Army Corps of Engineers, to ask for a more in-depth environmental impact statement regarding a final section of the Dakota Access oil pipeline represents a clash of power. The simple story is one of environmental and health concerns, but in reality the full story is much more. It is a continuation of the populist fervor building up in the United States. It is a continuation of the pursuit of infinite growth. It is a story of physical power, political power and economic power."
On my website (link) I also include comments received via e-mail, from readers (with no names even though some gave permission to use their names). Most of the comments were "pro" pipeline and/or a little miffed at my mention of a potential viewpoint of any group protesting something like a pipeline. I do think pipelines are the safest and cheapest (per unit) means of transporting gases and liquids (say versus trucks and trains). The point of the op-ed is that if a group of people have some grievance, justified or not, and directly related to a particular energy infrastructure project or not (e.g., a pipeline and potential for water contamination or just opposition to expanded fossil infrastructure more generally), then inhibiting the physical flow of power (e.g., oil flow in a pipeline) is a tactic to attempt to gain or keep some level of economic or political power.
|
|
Thank you very much for your time. As always, please contact me for more information about how you can be involved in and contribute to my research program and student researchers (they need food!).
Sincerely,
Carey W. King, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Assistant Director, Energy Institute, The University of Texas at Austin
careyking@mail.utexas.edu, 512.471.5468, careyking.com, @CareyWKing
|
|
My research takes a systems approach to describe the role of energy and energy technologies in our past and future. This approach provides the best way to both address questions about our future economy and environment as well as understand how individual technologies can and cannot affect the macro-scale and long-run trends that will frame our future options. I seek understanding of the relationships among:
- energy resources and technologies,
- population demographics,
- water and food,
- macroeconomic factors, and
- implications of internalizing environmental externalities.
|
|
To help us answer these thorny questions, we turn to an expert researcher who has looked at the relationship between energy consumption and the economy over long periods of time and multiple economies, and found some startling results with implications for the Federal Reserve, for economic policymakers, and for all those who are involved in energy transition.”
Link: http://energytransitionshow.com/episode-32-resources-and-economy/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|