You have one of the most successful football coaches in the country in Jimbo Fisher, who is consistently rumored for any number of other high profile jobs come off-season. How have you shown commitment to Fisher (outside financial incentives) to insure he remains with the Seminoles? Where do you think other athletic directors fall short when it comes to finding ways to retain their successful coaches?
It’s always a challenge to keep very good coaches but continued success is also a testament to their ability, and Jimbo has been able to do that. Other institutions will be interested in coaches that are consistently successful. So it is not uncommon – and was actually expected – that other schools would be trying to lure Jimbo away from Florida State. Any AD that wants to keep a successful coach must be able to provide what that coach needs to build and sustain a successful program. It is not always monetary, and it includes providing the best facilities so that the coach can continue recruiting at the highest level. It’s also about providing enough resources to maintain your assistant coaches and support staff to ensure that you minimize turnover. If you are able to show this commitment, then you have a better opportunity at keeping coaching consistency every year. It is something that we review and discuss annually. If the time ever comes where we are unable to provide the resources, I would expect that he could be lured away to another institution. Fortunately, to date, we have been able to meet the challenge of generating the necessary resources to create and upgrade facilities, meet staffing needs and fund what’s needed to continue recruiting the top talent in the country. I cannot speak for other athletics directors; however, in my opinion, the first thing you need to do is remove your own ego and focus on doing what’s best for the program to sustain success while also adhering to institutional practices and policies. You have to be a good listener to know exactly what it is that the coach finds important to sustain a successful program as well as being open and honest regarding what you are able to do within the department’s overall budget to meet the coach’s expectations. It is also important to keep an open mind and seek advice from other ADs who have gone through similar experiences successfully. In addition, you have to keep your president and key university officials apprised of everything. They are the ones who can also give you an indication if the university is willing and able to provide what the coach believes he or she needs to be successful.
Florida State has long been considered a “football school,” but has shown it can have success on the hardwood, too. Can any university be consistently great in both football and basketball or is there simply too much strain on the department to maintain two premier sports at a high level?
In my opinion, yes you can compete annually for conference and national championships in more than one sport at a high level. We do so here at Florida State in most of our sports across the board. In addition to Florida State, a few other schools that have had success in both football and basketball are Ohio State, Michigan, Texas and the University of Florida. For many years I have heard the terminology of “it’s a ‘football’ school or it’s a ‘basketball’ school” and some schools have been known as just that. Of course, it is important for an institution to have the necessary resources to recruit the best talent. I was a basketball student-athlete at the University of Notre Dame when our football team won the national title in 1977 and our basketball team advanced to the Final Four. Our football team winning the national championship inspired our basketball team to achieve the same. Many times the success of one program will inspire student-athletes in other sport programs to do the same. So, to me, being a “football” or “basketball” school is a misnomer – you can have comprehensive excellence in many different sports. That’s our goal at FSU and I’m sure most major institutions have the same goal. We may have more success in a particular sport over a period of time, but that doesn’t mean you can’t be successful in all sports and strive for (and expect) “comprehensive excellence” across the board.
Were there any moments you’ve come across during your career that stemmed from the fact that you are African-American? Do you believe minorities are still at a disadvantage when it comes to reaching the top of the college athletics hierarchy?
When I first started in this business, I worked at the NCAA national office in a department known at the time as legislative services. I worked in that department for five years and became proficient as a rules expert. During that time I received an opportunity to participate in mediation meetings between the NCAA and the Black Coaches Association (BCA). Being one of the more seasoned members and being the only African-American male in the legislative services department, I was requested to participate in these meetings. The individuals representing the BCA organization were all African-American and it was decided that it might be in the best interest of the NCAA to include diversity in the discussions. It was a very good experience and I had an opportunity to make some lifelong friends in the process. Years later when I worked for the Big East Conference, John Thompson, who was part of these mediation discussions, observed first-hand how I was able to handle myself during the negotiations. As a result, he entrusted me to help him with issues on his campus and recruited me to be on the Board of the BCA. That was one career moment where being African-American helped open opportunities for me. I do believe that the annual numbers compiled by the NCAA and organizations that monitor diversity still show that minorities are less likely to get hired as athletics directors, deputy athletic directors/senior staff, head coaches in football, women’s basketball and other sports. The numbers have not increased significantly and, in some cases, the numbers have gone down. This is an area that still needs to be addressed and analyzed. We have not moved forward in the off-the-field, “in the office” numbers of African-Americans at the decision-making, higher levels of athletics administration. We have large numbers of African-Americans participating on the playing fields and courts in the sports of football and basketball; however, the number of African-American head coaches in football, basketball, and among ADs, associate and assistant ADs have not increased as one might expect over the past 30 years that I have been in the business. That issue was discussed as a part of the BCA mediation.
|