Copy
Philip Mediation Newsletter (August 2018 - #2)
View this email in your browser

In this Issue:

Article: Imminent Changes to Washington's Arbitration Rules
Philip Mediation Website
Follow on LinkedIn
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Contact: 
 
Sasha S. Philip
(425) 298-7839
Sasha@PhilipMediation.com

Tip of the Day: 

"Those without power risk everything to tell their story."
- Laura Hershey
 
As most attorneys practicing in Washington State will know by now, the Mandatory Arbitration Rules are changing effective September 1, 2018. Some of the changes are minor, while others – such as a substantial increase in the jurisdictional amount – are significant. 

The Washington State Bar Association recently hosted a seminar on Arbitrator Ethics for current and aspiring arbitrators, at which my co-presenters and I discussed these imminent changes.


"Civil" Arbitration Rules (RCW 7.06.010)

The new rules remove any reference to the word "mandatory", instead renaming them "Civil Arbitration Rules". It is somewhat unclear why this change was made, except perhaps to distinguish these rules from binding (private) arbitration clauses in consumer contracts, which have received a fair amount of negative press coverage in recent years.

Increase in Jurisdictional Limit (RCW 7.06.020)


Until September 1, 2018, cases were subject to mandatory arbitration only if the amount of monetary relief claimed did not exceed $50,000. The jurisdictional limit will be increased to $100,000. This is a significant change, and one that is viewed very differently by plaintiffs and defense attorneys.

Plaintiffs' attorneys have been advocating for an increase in jurisdictional limits for years, as arbitration provides a mechanism for fast relief and avoids the lengthy delays and significant expenses associated with a full trial. In short, the plaintiffs' bar believes that this change will provide greater access to justice.

Defense attorneys, on the other hand, believe that this increase will allow plaintiffs to force more cases into arbitration while severely limiting defendants' ability to defend against these claims, due to short time windows for hearings and limits on discovery.


Qualifications of Arbitrators (RCW 7.06.040)

In a change that is significant primarily to arbitrators, the new rules require that nobody may be appointed as an arbitrator unless they have completed three hours of legal education credits on the professional and ethical considerations of serving as an arbitrator. There are some exceptions, which will depend on the specific county.

Unfortunately, seminars focused on this topic are currently scarce. The WSBA program referenced above is expected to be available online prior to September 1, 2018.


Date of Hearing (RCW 7.06.043)

While some counties had implemented a timeframe during which the arbitration hearing was required to occur prior to the current rule change, the new rules create a state-wide requirement. Hearings shall be scheduled to take place no sooner than 21 days and no later than 75 days after appointment of the arbitrator. In effect, this means that a decision can be obtained on a case within three months of appointment.

Parties may stipulate to a different timeline, but should be aware of any applicable local rules that may impact the ability to enter into such stipulations.


Discovery (RCW 7.06.047

This is another new state-wide rule, which limits discovery after assignment to arbitration. Parties may request medical examinations under CR 35, request admissions under CR 36, and take the depositions of parties. No other discovery is permitted except by order of the arbitrator.

While this streamlines cases for speediness and efficiency, there is an argument to be made that it will impact the ability to fully prepare a case. As such, it has the potential to result in an increased number of appeals.


Appeals (RCW 7.06.050)

The significant change to this section of the rules is the requirement that any notice of appeal must be signed by the party.

This appears to be quite straightforward, and is certainly in keeping with an attorney's obligation to keep their client advised of all developments and to act at the behest of the client. However, there are circumstances in which a client cannot be located in time or is uncooperative, which may leave that client with no recourse.


Conclusion

I do not know how these changes will affect the litigation and appeals of cases subject to the new Civil Arbitration Rules. I would love to hear from you if you have thoughts about this topic.

 ADR News & Events

 
  • Northwest Dispute Resolution Conference: SAVE THE DATE! The 2019 Annual Northwest Dispute Resolution Conference will take place on March 28-29, 2019, at the University of Washington School of Law. This is our 25th anniversary conference, so it should be especially exciting.
     
  • Northwest Dispute Resolution Conference: Interested in presenting at our conference? Requests for Proposals are now available. Submit yours by October 15, 2018.
     
  • TED Talk: 5 Ways to Listen Better (Julian Treasure)
 
You may know that my family's beautiful home state of Kerala in South India is being battered by torrential rains and devastating floods. As I write this, the death toll has reached nearly 400. Over a million people - including my aunt, uncle, and great aunt - have been displaced. I have received multiple inquiries about how to donate. Because it can be difficult to send money to India, I have started a Go Fund Me campaign. Donations as well as anything you can do to simply raise awareness of these events, would be very much appreciated.
Sasha S. Philip is the owner and founder of Philip Mediation, providing dispute resolution and conflict management services to clients in Seattle and the Pacific Northwest. When she is not conducting a mediation or arbitration, coaching mediation students or teaching at Seattle University School of Law, you will find Sasha singing with the Seattle Symphony Chorale, cooking, gardening, playing table-tennis or kayaking.

LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Addthis