Hey there,
I was talking with an entrepreneur and investor here in Chicago last week, and he pointed out a distinction that I’ve started to notice as well:
Most startups today can be classified as either “high tech” or “tech enabled.”
Not every startup has to be a sexy unicorn built on novel technology. Most of them are just small businesses who adopt technology faster than their industry does on average.
I wrote more about
High Tech vs. Tech Enabled Startups to elaborate on the differences I see, but as usual, I'm not the only one thinking this stuff. In his latest piece, Joseph Flaherty explains why
not every startup needs to be a “Startup”:
"With so many venture-backed startups being funded and growing quickly, we’ve lost the vocabulary to appreciate viable, but low-velocity tech startups."
The cool thing is that this class of "low-velocity" startups aren't necessarily small or "lifestyle" businesses. Flaherty gives examples of some huge, really cool companies that didn't grow like the archetypical Silicon Valley startups we think of.
Read more:
High Tech vs. Tech Enabled Startups, and
Not every startup needs to be a “Startup”