Copy
Jerusalem embassy debate has been simplistic, reductionist and poorly informed
Greg Sheridan
The Australian • November 15, 2018
Scott Morrison seriously considered attending the Armistice centenary commemorations in France and discussed such a trip at length with Governor-General Sir Peter Cosgrove. In the end, the two men felt the Prime Minister had more pressing matters in Australia and Sir Peter, a fine representative, went instead.Copy the following code.


It was a pity Morrison didn’t go to France and then straight on to Singapore. Morrison has a good instinct to marry our values and our interests in foreign policy. His government machine is not perfectly assembled yet, but is moving in the right direction. The Australian people love their Diggers and revere their memory. It is a classic case of popular wisdom trumping elite prejudice. The academic fashion does not honour the Diggers wholeheartedly. Mostly it doesn’t even teach military history, one reason, no doubt, for its popularity. A grave PM honouring the ¬Anzacs, and rubbing shoulders with leaders the Australian public knows and can put in some context, would have been useful for Morrison.
 
The PM’s remarks on the terrorist outrage in Melbourne were true, good and brave. My only quibble would be to suggest the term extremist “Islamism”, to distinguish the jihadist ideology from the religion itself.
 
Morrison has decided to complete his review of whether to relocate the Australian embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem by Christmas. Quite deliberately, he has decided to make the process as private as possible. It will be led by the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet and will involve Morrison’s own office. Relevant agencies will be consulted. This will result in a submission which Morrison will take to cabinet’s national security committee.
 
Morrison has decided he wants this issue cleared away. The debate in Australia has been simplistic, reductionist and poorly informed. The case in principle for formally recognising West Jerusalem as the capital of Israel is overwhelming. When in 1947 the UN tried to create a Jewish state and a Palestinian state next door, all of Israel’s neighbours attacked. Israel’s territory was established in the conflict and it included West Jerusalem.
 
The original UN plan envisaged Jerusalem as an international city. No one in the world argues that now. Israel had its parliament in Tel Aviv for a little while but quickly moved it to West Jerusalem. About 20 nations once had their embassies in West Jerusalem in the early 1970s.
 
Canberra already recognises West Jerusalem as sovereign Israeli territory. Our ambassadors present their credentials to the Israeli president in West Jerusalem. We routinely attend the Knesset for official meetings, as well as all the other ministries and official Israeli government agencies, in West Jerusalem.
 
One option for the Morrison government would be to issue a statement formally recognising West Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, along the lines that Russia has done. Another would be to say the government will make no move on the embassy now, but if the parties don’t resume negotiations within, say, six months, it may move the embassy.
 
It could then also say that East Jerusalem or parts of it could become a Palestinian capital in time, or that the future status of East Jerusalem will be determined in negotiations or some such.
 
Such a statement could also say that, although it now formally recognises West Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, Canberra has no plans to relocate the Australian embassy. Similarly, it is possible we could open a consulate in Jerusalem. There are all manner of possible outcomes.
 
Such a move would make a small but real contribution to forwarding the process of building a two-state solution in the Middle East because it would discourage the Palestinian leadership from thinking that its intransigence in refusing to negotiate with the Israelis is imposing a veto on how everyone else relates to Israel.
 
But the real argument for making some kind of statement about West Jerusalem is one of justice. Do we really believe that, alone among liberal democracies whose sovereign territory we recognise without qualification, Israel is not to be allowed to say where on its own territory its capital is?
 
Recognising Israeli sovereignty over West Jerusalem does not imply any recognition of Israel’s claim to have annexed parts of East Jerusalem.
 
Islamist politicians will not like any pro-Israel statement Canberra might make. It may be that some Indonesians will object to it. If that is the case, so be it. It would be completely wretched, and damaging to our national interests, for the Morrison government to back away now from doing anything on the Jerusalem front.
 
The separate review into Australian policy towards Iran, also led by PM&C, will report by early next month and the government may well bundle them together. But I think that, whatever it does on Iran, it needs to make some positive gesture on Jerusalem, both because this is the right thing to do in principle, and because we should not bend to unwarranted foreign interference in our foreign policy from third parties.
 
There is a tremendous lack of sophistication in the way most Australian commentators assess Indonesian reactions. People have talked as though the embassy issue has the potential to destroy every element of the Canberra-Jakarta relationship, including counter-terrorism co-operation and the rest. This is complete and absolute nonsense.
 
Tony Abbott as prime minister used our navy to physically turn around asylum-seeker boats and tow them back towards Indonesia. This was an infinitely bigger issue for Jakarta than the siting of our embassy in Israel. Yet it did not -affect any serious element of co-operation at all. Australian commentators, and politicians too, must learn to let the disparate elements of occasional Indonesian criticism wash past without having a nervous breakdown any time an Indonesian politician makes a critical remark.

Joko Widodo was scheduled to meet with Morrison for 20 minutes yesterday. The meeting went for 40 minutes. The two discussed the trade agreement and the embassy issue. The Indonesian President didn’t link them. The two men walked together to their next meeting.
 
In his earlier group meeting with Association of Southeast Asian Nations leaders, Morrison stressed the desirability of interfaith dialogue. Australia sponsors a number of such dialogues with Indonesia, and Widodo was warmly favourable in his response to Morrison’s remarks. Different ASEAN leaders stressed different elements of the Australia ASEAN relationship. Malaysia’s redoubtable Mahathir Mohamad stressed the long-term education relationship. The Thais were particularly appreciative of joint work with Australians to counter people-trafficking. The Singaporeans liked the smart cities co-operation.
 
We have good relations with ASEAN because we have a great and substantially bipartisan record with it.
 
Morrison’s big impediment is a lack of time. But overall he is driving in the right direction.
The Israeli Government Descends into Crisis
Vivian Bercovici
Commentary Magazine • November 14, 2018
Within minutes of the announcement in Israel last night that a ceasefire had been reached between Hamas and Israel, enraged residents of the southern city of Sderot took to the streets.
 
Home to approximately 25,000 people, including many immigrants from the former Soviet Union and Morocco, Sderot residents have borne the brunt of Hamas rockets for more than a decade now. They are fed up.

The ceasefire, some of these residents said, will last a few days or maybe a month before Hamas starts shelling again. For the Israeli government to capitulate after a 24-hour period in which almost 500 Hamas rockets pummeled Israeli civilians, this was altogether too much.
 
It was also a “red line” for Defence Minister Avigdor Lieberman, who announced his resignation earlier today in a dramatic press conference at the Knesset. 
Read more.
Iran Was Closer to a Nuclear Bomb Than Intelligence Agencies Thought
Michael Hirsh
Foreign Policy • November 13, 2018
A secret Iranian archive seized by Israeli agents earlier this year indicates that Tehran’s nuclear program was more advanced than Western intelligence agencies and the International Atomic Energy Agency had thought, according to a prominent nuclear expert who examined the documents.
 
That conclusion in turn suggests that if Iran pulls out of the 2015 multilateral nuclear deal that U.S. President Donald Trump has already abandoned, it has the know-how to build a bomb fairly swiftly, perhaps in a matter of months, said David Albright, a physicist who runs the non-profit Institute for Science and International Security in Washington, D.C. 
Read more.
Antisemites to the Left of Me, Nazis to the Right: Stuck in the Middle With Jews
Bruce Stockler
Algemeiner
 • November 7, 2018
We enjoyed a wonderful 60-year run, we American Jews. The postwar boom of the 1940s and 1950s heralded a Golden Age of Jewish cultural acceptance and influence. The 1950s marked the end of Jewish quotas for Ivy League admissions, Albert Einstein spoke out on social issues until his death in 1955, TV comedy rested in the hands of actor/writer/producers like George Burns, Milton Berle, Carl Reiner, and Sid Caesar, and Sandy Koufax was starting his ascent into baseball history.
 
In the 1960s, Jews became deeply involved in the civil rights movement, Abbie Hoffman played a central role in the formation of the counterculture, Lenny Bruce changed the face of stand-up comedy, Betty Friedan ushered in the second wave of feminism, and Bob Dylan shook up American music. From the 1950s until today, Jewish political thinkers of every stripe, from Henry Kissinger to Bernie Sanders, from Norman Mailer to Andrea Dworkin, from William Kunstler to Irving Kristol, enjoyed the freedom to launch heated intellectual debates across the political spectrum without having to suffer ad hominem attacks simply for being Jewish.
 
Those days are over. 
Read more.
How antisemitic stereotypes from a century ago echo today
Jonathan C. Kaplan
The Conversation • November 15, 2018
A few weeks ago, my parents woke up to find a large, orange swastika daubed in paint on a wooden plank outside their house in Sydney. We have a mezuzah attached to our front doorpost, so the “dauber” knew we were a Jewish household. At the time, my parents were angry and sad more than frightened.
 
My family’s experience cannot compare with the hate that burst forth in Pittsburgh several weeks ago, when 11 congregants at the Tree of Life Synagogue were murdered simply because they were Jewish people attending prayer. But we are living in a period of increasing hatred directed at minorities of all kinds, and antisemitism is on the rise across the globe. 
Read more.
Antisemitism, racial hatred no surprise
Bob Fagelson
Reformer • November 12, 2018
…After all, how can you expect an entire civilization represented by Christianity to not harbor antisemitic feelings. Their churches and preachers have drummed it into their heads for the past 2,000 years that the Jews killed their god. Just because Christianity has recently "forgiven" or found the Jews not guilty, doesn't mean that 2 millennia of brain washing will disappear.
 
…While ignoring all the wondrous things Jesus said on the Mount of Olives, through the centuries Christians demonstrated their "love" for their Jewish brethren with inquisitions, pogroms and, of course, the holocaust. Since WWII the bigotry has gone pretty much underground. It is naive of anybody to think that it went away altogether. 
Read more.
NGO rescinds award to U.S. Women's March due to antisemitism
Social democrats accuse US Palestinian activist Linda Sarsour of antisemitism. 
Benjamin Weinthal
Jerusalem Post 
• November 11, 2018
The think tank for the German social democratic party withdrew its Human Rights Award to the Women’s March USA in Washington, DC, on Thursday because doctoral students associated with the foundation accused the organisers of the march of hardcore antisemitism and support of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions campaign targeting the Jewish state.
 
…According to the open letter, “Sarsour, Carmen Perez [another board member of Women’s March USA], and Tamika D. Mallory [co-chairwoman of Women’s March USA who is to receive the FES Human Rights Award], have attracted attention due to their long-standing support of the notorious antisemite Louis Farrakhan, who, among other things, called Adolf Hitler a ‘very great man’ while recently comparing Jews to termites.” 
Read more.
British Jews Should Start Thinking About Migrating to Israel
Mor Altshuler
Haaretz • November 13, 2018
Rabbi Jonathan Sacks has no illusions about Jeremy Corbyn. In an interview with New Statesman that was published in late August, the former chief rabbi of the United Hebrew Congregations of the Commonwealth called Corbyn an antisemite and denounced the British Labour Party leader’s statement that British Zionists “don’t want to study history and ... don’t understand English irony.” Sacks understands that Corbyn is accusing British Jews of dual loyalty, a classic antisemitic canard.
 
Corbyn is a longtime supporter of Hamas and Hezbollah, which openly declare their desire to destroy Israel. Nevertheless, he has thus far won support from liberal Jews in Britain who have long seen Corbyn’s party as their home. For many years, Labour reflected their ideals — globalization, universalism and love of the “other.” Now, their world is collapsing around them.
 
The British Jewish journalist Melanie Phillips assailed them in an essay in Britain’s Jewish Chronicle (September 13) for having been silent when Corbyn spouted antisemitic venom about Israel and painted it as a bloodthirsty occupier, a satanic state, yet being shocked now that he’s closing in on them.
 
Denial of reality, shock and disbelief are classic responses to distress among liberal Jewish communities, from German Jews who, after the rise of the Nazis, refused to believe that their loyalty to Germany would end in their deaths, to Communist Jews in Stalin’s Soviet Union, who believed the blood libels against other Jews until they themselves were executed or exiled to prison camps in Siberia.
 
Now as then, liberal Jews are trapped by their noble mission of “fighting from within.” In Britain, they refuse to admit that Corbyn prefers his Muslim friends to bleeding-heart Jews. And in France, philosopher Bernard-Henri Levy compares the Jews to Jonah the prophet, who was sent to persuade residents of Nineveh repent.
 
The Jews must remain in France and fight so that it won’t fall into the hands of the barbarians, he said last year in a lecture at Bar-Ilan University. Levy’s barbarians aren’t just right-wing antisemites, but also the left-wing antisemites who fawn over Muslim voters, whose numbers are steadily growing in western Europe.
 
Frighteningly, the old antisemitism of the right in Europe is increasingly joining hands with the antisemitism of the left and Muslim immigrants, and this combination is liable to reach the United States as well. The day is nearing when it will no longer be possible to distinguish between antisemitism toward the Jewish community, which espouses liberal and universalist values, and antisemitism toward Israel, “the Jew among the nations.” And it’s impossible to legitimize or forgive either of them, because they stem from the same poisoned root.
 
I’m sorry for those enlightened, cosmopolitan Jews, but this must be said openly: Their mission to rehabilitate the haters and discover the light in their hearts has ended. They shouldn’t wait until Corbyn is elected prime minister of Britain, or until Linda Sarsour becomes head of the Democratic Party in the United States. They must correctly understand the historical process by which antisemitism effects a rapprochement between the radical right and the radical left and its Muslim supports.
 
This is the time to start thinking about emigration. Luckily for them, their parents supported the establishment of Israel, and therefore, today they have a homeland and a country to which to flee.
Palestinian worker in Israel killed by Hamas Rocket Had Nowhere to Run
Yotam Berger and Jack Khoury
Haaretz 
November 13, 2018
The civilian who was killed on Monday night when a rocket hit an apartment building in Ashkelon has been identified as Mahmoud Abu Asba, a 48-year-old man from Halhul, a town near Hebron in the West Bank.  
 
Abu Asba was located thanks to a Jewish neighbour, Shlomi Lankri, who passed by the ruined building after emergency services had left the scene. Lankri noticed the fingers of a woman who was buried under the rubble. She and another woman, both in their forties, were pulled out of the ruins, one in critical and the other in serious condition.

Lankri had come to the site to document the destruction at around 1 am. He said he noticed some movement and started digging in the rubble with the help of another man who arrived on the scene. Together they pulled out Abu Asba and one of the women. Abu Asba was declared dead at the site.
 
One of Abu Asba’s neighbours said that there were no shelters in the building. “There is nothing here, it’s all closed” he added. “People converted what there was into storage spaces. Even if there was a shelter, older people wouldn’t have reached it. All the older people left after the rocket hit.”
 
None of the neighbours knew Abu Asba and there were rumors in the neighborhood that he was a collaborator or that he was in the city without a permit. However, it turns out that he worked in Israel with a permit. Like other workers, he had obtained permission from the defense establishment to remain in Israeli territory instead of leaving the country's borders after each workday. He worked at construction sites during the day, returning to the apartment at night. The rocket which hit the building buried him under the rubble.
 
A grocery owner nearby said that Abu Asba had lived there for at least two months and shared the apartment with other workers, who were not there on Tuesday morning. The grocery owner added that one of the injured women also lived in that apartment. Neighbors said she was Palestinian, but didn’t know her name or any other details.
 
Abu Asba was the first casualty in Israel in this round of hostilities between Israel and the Palestinians, which began on Sunday. 
Abu Asba's family said in a statement released on Tuesday that he left his house in Halhul on Sunday and that his wife was with him in the apartment in Ashkelon when the building was hit by the rocket. 
 
His family is expected to come to Israel to identify his body. His funeral is slated to take in Halhul. Abu Asba is survived by six children- four sons and two daughters.
Archaeologists reveal 1500 year old image of Jesus - clean shaven, long nose, curly hair
Mike McRae
Science Alert 
• November 14, 2018
The crimson pigment is sun-bleached, its eroded lines barely visible against the texture of the plaster. But with effort, you can see a face that once decorated an ancient Christian baptismal in southern Israel. And it's not what you'd expect. Read more.
Follow the Executive Council of Australian Jewry online for our latest updates, reports and media releases:
Facebook
ECAJ.org.au
Twitter
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed in the foregoing articles are not necessarily those of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, its officers, councillors, or employees. The ECAJ Policy Platform can be accessed here

Copyright © 2018 Executive Council of Australian Jewry. All rights reserved. You are receiving this email because you requested to be included in our media briefings and statements. 
Update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

Our mailing address is: P.O. Box 1114, Edgecliff, NSW, Australia 2027.






This email was sent to <<Email Address>>
why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences
EXECUTIVE COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIAN JEWRY · PO Box 1114 · Edgecliff, NSW 2027 · Australia

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp