Copy

ITTE
Newsletter of the Association for Information Technology in Teacher Education

ISSN 1362-9433

Autumn 2017
A member of the CfSA
In this issue ...
       Best way to read the newsletter: view in your browser    
The Editor has a say...
 
Welcome to the ITTE Newsletter, Autumn 2017



Hello Members

Before I introduce myself I would like to thank Alison for all the hard work she has put into producing the Newsletter over recent years. Alison will be a tough act to follow but I will do my best.

As you have probably gathered I am Jan Barnes and I am a teacher educator from across the border in Wales. I have been a member of ITTE for a number of years but have only been active over the last 12 months.

I have been involved in Initial Teacher Education specialising in Computing and ICT since 2006, my interests include the development of digital pedagogy and how emergent technology can support learning.

On a personal note I very much look forward to editing the newsletter but am new to the role, so please bear with me.

Regards

Jan,
University of Wales Trinity Saint David (UWTSD)


 
NOTE:
The display of this newsletter may vary in your inbox:
  1. Images might not be displayed automatically. Check for a link in the mail header to display them.
  2. The newsletter might be clipped. Again, check for a link above or below the newsletter to view all.
  3. Of course you can always view it in your browser
Editorial
Christina Preston ITTE Chair


I am taking over the chair of ITTE at an exciting time when the role of ‘learned societies’ in the policy landscape has been re-established by the latest Royal Society of Arts report: After the Reboot. https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/projects/computing-in-schools/report/  It looks as though there should be a role for ITTE in policy making since the report concludes that the "current delivery of Computing education in many UK schools is highly unsatisfactory' citing the shortage of teachers, the lack of CPD and inadequate computing infrastructure in the schools. The report call for a further £60 million of funding but Merlin John (http://agent4change.net/) presumably to go to the same organisations behind the current 'force-feeding' of computer science to children at the expense of the wider skills and digital literacy called for industry and the Royal Society's previous report "Shut down or Restart”

On a more hopeful note Sarah Younie and I have been invited to sit on the DfE Round table for Edtech CPD and we will be submitting ITTE and MirandaNet joint views about the way forward. In addition, Andy Connell and I were at the Council for Subject Associations where Amelia Walker, Deputy Director; Research and Evaluation, talked about the ‘Ofsted Curriculum Research Programme'. She suggested that Ofsted inspections might be responsible for the fact that many schools teach to the test thus impoverishing the curriculum. Yes she really did say that!  Further meetings with her are planned.

The ITTE committee boasts a wide range of talents and spans the generations which is vital to the organisation's health. Jon Audain will be leading the annual conference, Raising Aspirations for Digital Education at Winchester University 7-8 Jun 2018. Meanwhile a second phase of our knowledge mobilisation fellowships has been launched at £1,000 per project

In addition, the ITTE committee has agreed in principle to work in partnership with MirandaNet on several joint projects this year. At the next ITTE AGM to be held at the Winchester conference in June 2018 further proposals will be presented about how to take this partnership forward with mutual benefit to both memberships. 

I shall also be delighted to hear from members with ideas about how we should be tackling the challenges our profession faces and who we should be meeting. You may also have ideas about relevant keynotes for our conference. 
FAREWELL from HELEN BOULTON, OUTGOING CHAIR

I joined ITTE 14 years ago and continue to enjoy my membership, having made some life-long friends and had opportunities professionally that I never expected.  I was delighted when I was elected to sit on the National Executive Committee over 10 years ago and have broadened my experience through the opportunities this has presented.  Having been re-elected 3 times I was then invited to take up the role as vice-Chair, then became Chair.  

Reflecting back on my time as Chair it is pleasing to see how our profile has continued to grow from strength to strength.  We now have Lord Jim Knight as our Patron, have established an international annual symposium with UNESCO, ha
ve our annual conference which has international representation, and are now working with the DfE.  As an Association we now have a clear Strategy that has been shared with members and which will support our continued growth over the next 3-5 years.

My next role on the Committee is to co-ordinate the Knowledge Mobilisation Strategy, which has just completed its first successful round.  More of this later in the Newsletter.  This new development for ITTE was initiated by Marilyn Leask, Moira Savage and Jon Audain, and co-ordinated by Moira during its first year. 

I would like to take this opportunity to thank all of the Committee and members of the Association for the continued support they have given me, particularly as Chair, but also as a member of our vibrant Association. I look forward to my continued role on the Committee and supporting Christina in her role as our new Chair.

Helen Boulton

 

ITTE Knowledge Mobilisation Strategy: Research Fellowship Programme
 

INVITATION TO APPLY
We are delighted to announce Phase 2 of the ITTE Knowledge Mobilisation Strategy.
 
This is relevant to:
Schools Direct -   Teaching Schools  - Teachers - Teacher Educators - Researchers
 
For Phase 2 educators are invited to lead a small team in filling in the research gaps, to challenge and strengthen research in areas relevant to the Association. Funded Fellowships are available to develop collaborative and/or co-ordinated research networks on a topic of interest to you within the field of digital technologies in educational settings relevant to the work of ITTE. This approach to developing evidence is well established in medicine. See, for example, the Cochrane Collaboration www.cochrane.org.

Information on Phase 1 successful projects can be found at itte.org.uk.

£1,000 Fellowship bursaries are available for teams interested in making a commitment to this area of knowledge in the long term. Project Leads will be supported by ITTE to recruit a team of interested people. Further funding may also be available in the future to revisit and extend the project subject to an impact review about the value of the Fellowship for the ITTE community.

For the period of the award, the Project Lead/s will be able to use the title ITTE Research Fellow and team mermbmers will be able to use the title ITTE Educational Researcher.
 
The outcomes of the Fellowship within two years are expected to be:
  • a research review to be submitted for publication as an academic article in the Association’s journal Teaching, Pedagogy and Education 
  • a summary of the findings of the review written in a form usable by teachers and published as a MESHGuide.
  • dissemination including a presentation at the ITTE annual conference or alternative agreed by the ITTE National Executive Committee.
The outcomes of this application round will be announced on the ITTE web site in January 2018.
 
Eligibility: Applications are open to all but the project leader must be an ITTE member. To join go to the ITTE website: itte.org.uk.

To submit an application please complete the form at:  http://bit.ly/2j9dFYN.

 
Deadline: 10 January 2018
ITTE-MirandaNet Conference 2018
 
 
2018 ITTE-MirandaNet Conference, Winchester University
Raising aspirations for digital education

7th-8th June 2018

What are the digital skills that teachers and pupils need and how can we support all learners to achieve their potential? How can we improve computing education, broadening how we prepare children to become digital citizens and make fulfilling use of digital tools throughout their lives?

The conference welcomes teachers, teacher educators, advisors and researchers to share and develop professional knowledge and skills through presentations and workshops with leading practitioners and researchers. CPD certificates will be awarded to all participants.
 
A Call for Submissions will be circulated in January  
Evidence-informed practice – much talk, little action
Prof. Sarah Younie De Montfort University
First published in the Bera Blog: Research Matters October 2017
 
Evidence-informed practice in classrooms (EPiC practice) is a growing issue for teachers in schools and interestingly a Google search on the topic gives a million and a half returns.

We define evidence-informed practice as requiring both research/evidence and teacher professional judgement about the context and learners i.e. explicit knowledge plus tacit knowledge. In our view, all teachers can be EPiC practitioners if they are given the tools – as a minimum, this means access to research based knowledge translated to relate to practice.

Over recent years as those of us in the MESH  network (Mapping Education Specialist knowHow) have canvassed colleagues about practice in other countries, we find there is little action beyond expressions of concern by policy makers and the recurrent commissioning of reports which yield nothing new (DFE, 2017). 

As a co-author of one of the major textbooks used for secondary teacher training in the UK, in writing it I became only too aware of the extensive professional knowledge base that educators need to draw on. However, academic papers are written as conversations between academics. Arguably, they are not and never will be designed to meet the needs of practitioners.
 
High quality teaching requires a high degree of pedagogic knowledge as well as up-to-date subject content knowledge. However, we find that in many areas, the research that can underpin practice is either not available or not easily accessible to teachers. As reported at conference, in the ‘Educational Research and Policy Making’ SIG discussing the UNESCO Sustainable Development Goals about improving the quality of teaching, the MESHGuide research summaries could provide one answer to the need for translational research i.e. translating research and theory into practice in education.

MESH supports the use of scalable and low cost technologies to enable educators to engage in research collaborations and publications around topics that can make a difference to student’s learning. We are at the beginning of a long journey to pool, share and test our collective research-based knowledge, including knowledge about how to diagnose problems learners face and interventions that help them overcome barriers to learning. We estimate thousands of concepts need to be included in the MESHGuide list. This is a challenging task.

 

New European Project Launched

Helen Boulton, Nottingham Trent University
 
Nottingham Trent University are working with Partners from across Europe on a new Erasmus + project, ‘Mobile Pedagogical Assistant to develop meaningful pathways to personalised learning’ (Pathways).  All Partners are from countries who have ratified the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with disabilities.  The project sets out to provide teachers and teacher educators with a toolset to develop innovative pedagogies, using mobile games application, to support the assessment of children as part of a holistic approach towards inclusive education.

The partners include Ministries of Education, pedagogical experts, schools, school authorities and their umbrella structures all over Europe; service providers providing services and / or support to pupils with special educational needs; authorities at all levels, with competences in the field of education; associations for teachers and teacher unions.  This is an exciting project which will continue over the next 3 years.

The ITTE website will provide members with updates of the project via the blog space.  This first meeting provided a space for the team to work together to develop a descriptive map of effective pedagogical approaches which will be shared at the ITTE conference in June 2018 and will become available as a MESh guide.  Ongoing updates are available throughout the project via www.pedagogies-pathway.eu.

If you would like further information on this project please get in touch.
Bringing together researchers, practitioners and policy makers interested in Technology Enhanced Learning

Margaret J. Cox (Co-Founder of Edusummits)

During the writing of the International Handbook for Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education in 2008 by Springer, the 18 Section Editors considered ways in which the reported research which would be published in the handbook might also reach policy makers and practitioners. Everyone agreed at the final editors’ meeting in Paris in 2007 that a follow-on World Summit bringing together researchers, practitioners and policy makers could help broaden the global impact of the International handbook and reduce the usual risk of policy makers and practitioners ‘reinventing the wheel’. A group of the editors formed a founding committee which organised the first Edusummit2009 held in The Hague in The Netherlands in June 2009. 70 leading researchers, policy makers and practitioners, working in groups, defined action steps for policy makers building on the work published in the Handbook on ICT in Primary and Secondary Education.
 
Since that first Edusummit, there have now been 4 subsequent summits in Paris (2011), Washington (2013), Bangkok (2015) and recently in Borovets. Bulgaria in September 2017. Several ITTE members have been regular contributors to these Edusummits and other members might be interested in contributing to the next one to be held in Quebec in September 2019. Meanwhile many of the working group papers will be of interest to ITTE members such as the Ebook produced by Edusummit2015 entitled Technology Advanced Quality Learning For All with articles from all nine working groups including “Advancing mobile learning in formal and informal settings”; “Professional development for policy makers, school leaders and teachers”; "Addressing gaps and promoting educational equity”; “Assessment as, for and of Learning” and "Advancing understanding of the roles of CS/Informatics in the curriculum” led by ITTE members Dr. Mary Webb and Prof. Margaret Cox.
 
Even the Edusummit steering committee manages to take a break sometimes. Below is a photo of some Steering committee members relaxing at Guildford (Surrey, UK) Operatic Burns night taking a break from planning the Edusummit2013 meeting held later in the year in September in Washington DC. From left to right at the table: Prof. David Gibson (USA, now at University of Curtin, Australia and co-Chair of Edusummit2015 in Bangkok); Prof. Mike Searson (USA); Joan Hounsome (Guildford Opera); Assistant Professor Jo Tondeur (Belgium); Prof. Margaret Cox (King’s College London, Founder and Steering committee member and co-chair for Edusummit2019, Lifelong Fellow of ITTE); Dr. Mary Webb (King’s College London; and Leader of Working group on Computer Science in the school curriculum and ITTE member); and finally Professor Joke Voogt (Founder and Steering Committee member of  Edusummit, Co-Editor of the International Handbook); Professor at University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Prof. Gerald Knezek of the University of North Texas (also Steering Committee member of Edusummits) took the photo!



Similar policy documents have been produced at the most recent Edusummit2017 and the groups are in the process of writing up more extensive reports.  For example: TWG3: 'Professional development for technology-enhanced Learning leaders' focussed on the “professional development for school leaders with an emphasis on how to provide effective technology enhanced instruction from the perspective of a culture of learning. Learning technologies should support curriculum in ways that are not otherwise possible. Rather than focusing on the technology, learning activities should meet instructional goals and involve technology when it enhances the learning. Often teachers conceptualize integration as technological rather than primarily as curricular (Hutchison & Reinking, 2011). However, the focus should be on the learning and the curriculum, not the technology.”
 
ITTE members who feel that these numerous and well substantiated reports might support their ITT work, research or PhD supervision can find all the reports of the five EDusummits as well as download individual chapters of the 1st Edition of the International Handbook from the Web. The 2nd edition is currently being written and will be published in 2019. Any ITTE members interested in getting involved in the Edusummits can find Group Leader details on the websites.

↑↑ Back to Top ↑↑

Tomorrow’s Learning – The World Conference on Computers in Education

Chris Shelton, University of Chichester

This year, the World Conference on Computers in Education (WCCE 17) was held in Dublin, 3rd - 6th July 2017 and organized by IFIP and the Irish Computer Society. The conference theme was “Tomorrow’s Learning: Involving Everyone” and over 200 presenters from across the world shared their work at the conference. As you would expect from an international conference, the keynote sessions were very varied: Francesco Avvisati from OECD (with a recorded contribution from Andreas Schleicher) opened the conference and spoke about the 2015 report “Students, Computers and Learning”. When first published, this report was widely reported as showing that using technology in schools had a negative impact on learning but, as Avvisati showed, the report actually raises interesting questions about how we can best make use of technology and shows that teachers and school leaders need to think carefully about their use of technology.
 
The second keynote was Valerie Shute from Florida State University. She spoke about the role of “stealth assessment” in game based learning. This was a new idea for me and I’m still not sure that “stealth” is the word I want to use to describe my assessments. But, the way that this was used to promote learning through the “Physics playground” game was effective and I enjoyed playing the demo version of the game (now, sadly, not available).
 
Lord David Puttnam spoke in his role as the “Digital Champion” for Ireland and made some thought-provoking use of archive film and television footage. I was particularly struck by a video from the BBC archive that shows teenagers in 1984 sharing their views on technology. It’s fascinating to think that at that time, it was possible to imagine that computers would might have a future role in the home but not have a role in the workplace. (The video is called Speak Out: Micros and Girls and is available through the BBC Archive social media feeds).
 
Two speakers represented UNESCO (which is closely linked to the sponsors of the conference IFIP). Davide Storte introduced the Mobile Youth programme (http://en.unesco.org/youthmobile) that is helping young people, particularly young women, in developing countries to learn to create apps. The apps they have created are nothing if not ambitious – with one group in Sudan creating a app for peace. Indrajit Banerjee, UNESCO Director of Knowledge Societies spoke about the role of Open Educational Resources in education. He made some challenging comments about the ubiquity of the English language on the internet and how many languages are not yet represented online.
 
The connection between technology and language was particularly apparent in one of my favourite submitted paper presentations of the conference. In a paper by Therese Keane, Monica Williams, Christina Chalmers and Marie Boden, we were introduced to a project using humanoid robots in Australia. In the example that they shared, the robot was programmed by pupils at Maitland Lutheran School in rural South Australia to speak in the local aboriginal language of Narungga. This is especially significant because it has become a dormant language with only one fluent speaker remaining. The children made an emotional connection with the robot and enthusiastically taught it the language while learning it themselves. While the cost of such robots would make it difficult to repeat the project right now, the impact is clear so I’ll look forward to the prices dropping! You can see the robot in action at: https://youtu.be/E6MjUxLvsPM
 
It was great to see so many members and friends of ITTE presenting at WCCE 17. The next IFIP education conference will be the Open Conference on Computers in Education (OCCE 18) to be held in Linz, Austria on 25-28th June 2018. More information will appear on the conference website shortly http://occe.2018.ocg.at
 
 
Is Mlearning a Thing?

David Longman, MirandaNet Fellow
Prof Sarah Younie, De Montfort University

ITTE Fellowship Project: Mobilising earning: A synoptic review of learning supported by personal devices. In the 18 months since this review was begun the digital environment has continued to evolve rapidly in two main ways. The first is that the mobile phone form factor continues to rise as the leading device for accessing the internet and in some regions and nations it dominates other form-factors by a large margin (Haiti is included for comparison as one of the 20 lowest GDP nations in the world):
 
Table 1: proportions of form-factors used for online search:

%

World

UK

USA

China

India

Africa

Asia

Haiti

Mobile

51.0

36.0

39.0

62.0

79.0

65.0

65.0

78.5

Desktop

45.0

53.0

53.0

34.0

20.5

32.5

32.0

20.0

Tablet

4.50

11.0

8.0

2.0

0.7

2.5

2.0

2.0

These figures hide important details but they illustrate the increasing dominance of the ‘mobile way’ online (the differences between the UK or USA is likely a historic ‘early adopter’ effect). Disguised too are considerable inequalities in mobile phone ownership rates within nations and which likely correlate with educational opportunity:

Table 2: percentage of population owning a smartphone:

Haiti

India

China

USA

UK

13

23

52

69

69

A second area is the increasing technical sophistication and sensitivity of the hardware and software capabilities built into mobile devices. Mapped against human sensory capabilities, for example, smartphones are remarkable devices: they ‘respond’ to your human touch, ‘recognise’ your face, and ‘hear’ you speak to them. They can’t yet 'touch’ you or ‘smell’ you (although if dogs can smell some cancers why not your smartphone?) but they are receptive to forces and fields we mostly don’t notice directly such as gravity, magnetism and electromagnetism.

Public concerns have grown concurrently too. The power and influence of stakeholders in the digital economy, from international advertising giants such as Google to bureaucratic organs of state like the DVLA, has fuelled provoked ongoing concerns about the influence of lobbyists, marketeers or political trolls on the integrity of news feeds; concerns about the accumulation and marketing of personal data; the expansion of biometric and sociometric data capture; or the potential impact of cognitive automation on the workplace (that includes our classrooms); or the shift towards a ‘gig’ economy and a ‘precariat’ economic class (which includes more and more school-leavers and graduates). The list goes on.

Nevertheless, mobile technologies, like all computational technologies, are to be embraced for their human potential and the enrichment they can bring to learning and education. Given their relative ubiquity in our own society (a 70% ownership rate in the UK) the benefits they can bring to education could be considerable, if we get it right. It remains an open question, therefore, if mobile learning (or m-learning, or mlearning) is a radically different kind of edtech requiring its own paradigm. Is it an alternative or an accessory? Our forthcoming paper with the working title “Is Mobile Learning a Thing?” takes on that discussion.
Educational Reform: An insight into the Welsh Context

Dr Jan Barnes, UWTSD

Wales has a population of just over three million and includes about 540,000 children aged 0–15 years. Further, 19% of the Welsh population speak Welsh; 23% live in households in relative income poverty. 29% of children too live in households in relative income poverty. These proportions are greater than equivalent figures for England, Scotland and Northern Ireland (13%, 11% and 13% respectively). Recent PISA results have indicated a drop in performance in Wales resulting in lowest results among the home nations. It is within this context that there is a drive for change across all schools in Wales.

The Welsh Government review of education has involved a rigorous consideration of the Welsh curriculum including associated assessment and reporting processes, and the systemic review of provision for initial teacher education (ITE). Both Donaldson (‘Successful Futures’ 2015) and Furlong (‘Teaching Tomorrow’s Teachers’, 2015) were published in 2015 and make reference to each other. All recommendations made within both reports have been accepted and supported by Welsh Government.

The curriculum is designed to have four purposes, that young people in Wales develop to become:
  • ambitious, capable learners, ready to learn throughout their lives
  • enterprising, creative contributors, ready to play a full part in life and work
  • ethical, informed citizens of Wales and the world
  • healthy, confident individuals, ready to lead fulfilling lives as valued members of society
The Donaldson report also recommended that the 3-14 curriculum is split into six “Areas of learning & Experience”(AoLE): Expressive arts; Health and well-being; Humanities; Languages, literacy and communication; Mathematics and numeracy; and Science and technology, positioning Computer Science as a fourth science firmly within the Science and Technology AoLE. In addition to the AoLE  are three mandatory cross curricular responsibilities, Literacy, Numeracy and Digital Competence.

The literacy and numeracy framework was published in October 2014 (mandatory in 2015) in an effort to improve levels of literacy and numeracy (the LNF framework is here ). 2016 saw the launch of the Digital Competence Framework (DCF), an outcome of the Donaldson Report which reviewed the curriculum in Wales and recommended some significant changes. Developed by practitioners from Pioneer Schools and supported by external experts, the DCF has 4 strands of equal importance, broadly defined as Citizenship, Interacting and collaborating, Producing and Data and computational thinking. (See the DCF here).

Fundamentally the recommendations aim for a shift of focus from instrumental pupil outcomes to their well being, engagement and preparation for life. This culture shift in education in Wales will make very different demands on the teaching profession in the future. In order to respond to these developments the whole teacher education system is undergoing an overhaul.
 
The placement of computing into the AoLE with the other Science subjects and Technology, signifies its status as a subject within the curriculum. However, the implications for the teachers within the subject may be a need for further training and enhancement of subject skills to make this effective. The inclusion of the Digital Competency framework is also positive, even if it is not statutory like its cousins the Literacy and Numeracy Framework.  However if it is going to enacted successfully I believe there is not only a need to educate our teachers in the use of technology, but also in the development of Technological and Pedagogical Content Knowledge  (TPACK) they will need in order that technology is developed appropriately and seamlessly in our classrooms.

The recognition that there is a greater need for teacher development if this curriculum is going to succeed, has resulted in the Welsh Governments formation and funding of  a number of "National Networks of Excellence".

The National Network of Excellence in Mathematics (NNEM) has already been announced, and the National Network for Excellence in science  & Technology (NNEST) is due to be launched in December. The aim of these networks is to engage with material and knowledge mobilisation within the disciplines in order to assist in supporting the teachers.

It is an exciting and challenging time for Welsh Education system. The Welsh Government needs to recognise that changes of this magnitude, in both process and culture, is not going to be effective overnight but needs to take place over the longer term. The current target date for the overall completion of the reforms has been updated to 2020 with the aim that  the first cohort of 16-year-olds to have followed the new curriculum will sit their end of school exams in summer 2027.
ITTE members’ academic development:
Become an Associate or Full member of the National Conference of University Professors.

Margaret Cox, President of NCUP
 
The National Conference of University Professors was founded in 1989 by a group who felt that professors have a particular responsibility for the academic directions of universities and that a forum for discussion and expression of their voice on such issues was needed. NCUP membership is broadly distributed geographically and covers all disciplines across the arts, sciences, technology, humanities and social sciences.
 
In the last two years as we all know, there has been increasing pressure on all academics to publish their research, obtain research grants and widen the impact of their work while often trying to carry out an extensive teaching programme, especially for those, like ITTE members in teacher education at universities. As a response to this pressure, NCUP has provided seminars open to all interested colleagues as well as members on topics such as 'Inter-professional Collaboration for Sustainability', 'Mentoring and Support of Young Career Researchers' and 'Spaced Out: Physical Space and Technology Needs in Universities'.
 
We are also aware of the difficulties many university teaching staff have faced in their career progression from lecturer to professor due to, in substantial part. to the pressure on time available for research. As a consequence, over a year ago, NCUP established an Associate membership category (ANCUP) for those academics with senior teaching positions and/or long research records to enable them to join the supportive network of NCUP to help their career progression, research achievements and academic standing. Already two ITTE members who joined as Associate members have now become full professors.
 
The patron of NCUP is Baroness Perry, a long-standing expert in higher education and a great supporter of Educational associations and NCUP members.
 
 
Those ITTE members wishing to apply for either full membership (existing professors) or Associate Membership should contact the  Membership Secretary, cherylhumphrey@ymail.com
For up to date information about NCUP see http://www.ncup.org.uk/

 
 
In the News

BERA has partnered with the Academy of Social Sciences and Routledge, Taylor & Francis to bring together a wide-ranging collection of impactful research on education that has improved standards of individual attainment and school quality, while also influencing public policy. ‘Making the Case for the Social Sciences:12 – Education’ comprises 12 case studies that have led to improvements in learning and teaching practices. Studies featured in the booklet also demonstrate the positive impacts of social science and educational research on public policy, while highlighting its benefit to society more generally.
JB.


Could do better, seems to be the verdict of the much anticipated Royal Science Report 'After the Reboot'. Many commentaries have emerged and there is some concern that not enough has been done to consolidate the curriculum change and there is little planning for its future growth. Too many pupil/s are denied the opportunity to undertake computing because too many schools do not offer it. Progress is "patchy and fragile". The hopeful sign is that there will be injections of cash to promote teacher development for computing. Hints are to expect £100million in the next Budget for "an additional 8,000 fully-qualified computer science teachers supported by a new National Centre for Computing". (Note: we used have a National Computing Centre but it closed in 2010!)
DL.


If ever there was a case for a broad and enlightening computing education then John Naughton's op-ed in the Guarding offers one argument for the defence (or is it the prosecution?): How a half-educated tech elite delivered us into chaos. Some of the most well-known entrepreneurs of the medium seem alarmingly ignorant about he human effects of what they do. Should they know better? Well, yes and no. One issue may be that engineering sciences are still taught as a form of 'solutionism', an 'it works' attitude that can blind us to consequences. Another issue is that much of the talk about computational thinking is obviously wrong - once algorithms get launched into the world there is never enough debugging! This is why curriculum breadth in computing matters.
DL.


I came late to reading Cathy O'Neil's Weapons of Math Destruction. It's an important book, clearly written and a straightforward read setting out a some profound problems about the way that imperfect algorithms become embedded and i effect turn against us.  Perhaps it should be on every education postgraduate reading list? And not one week after finishing the book this story popped up in my news feed. Power and policy outweigh reasoned analysis of 'bugs' (let alone fixing them).
DL.
Book Reviews

Review of 'Lifelong Kindergarten: Cultivating Creativity through Projects, Passion, Peers, and Play' by Mitchel Resnick

Review by David Longman

At first, I was a little disappointed with Mitchel Resnick’s new book ‘Lifelong Kindergarten’. I had expected to read more about the genesis and development of Scratch along with other interesting background about the brilliant work of the Lifelong Kindergarten group led by Mitchel Resnick. Yes, a lot of that is in there though somewhat incidentally; it did not seem central to the book I was expecting and I was puzzled.

I put it aside for a day or two after I decided that this was yet another homily about the stultification of ‘natural’ human learning caused by organised but inauthentic schooling.  Worthy but not new and at 200 pages with a lot of white space it promised a relaitvely light read.

It’s all there in the book’s title. The four P’s? Cultivating creativity? Kindergarten? But this is Mitchel Resnick! Lego/Logo, Starlogo, Computer Clubhouses, Scratch! I have to pay attention.

Then after reading on a few more pages I realise that is probably one of the most interesting and practical books I have read for a while.

Far from disappointing after all.

Read the full review here ...

-oo0oo-
 
Review of 'Digital Technologies and Change in Education: The Arena Framework' by Niki Davis

Review by Christina Preston

I remember in the 1990s at the start of an ITTE conference at Exeter University when we were all given a CD-ROM of the papers instead of the paper programme we had all learnt to expect. Niki Davis, who was behind this strategy, was an innovator from the start of her career.

In this book, Niki, now Distinguished Professor of E-learning at the University of Canterbury, New Zealand, generously tells her story about what she has learnt about teacher education in EdTech since the 1980s and from whom she has learnt her profressonal expertise. What she presents in this book about her own journey is the milestones that influenced the development of her theoretical framework, the Arena. This first version of the Arena emerged after a MirandaNet gathering in London.

Read the full review here ...

-oo0oo-

Review of 'Mobile learning in schools : key issues, opportunities and ideas for practice' by Jocelyn Wishart

Review by David Longman

Here is a useful and relevant overview of the use of mobile technologies in teaching and learning, or ‘mlearning’ as it is sometimes known. As the title suggests it aims at practitioners working in schools but it also has a more specific audience in mind: practitioners who work in teacher development and teacher education. There is thus a great deal here for practitioner-researchers and practitioner-developers who are thinking  about exploring mlearning through investigation or project. Living up to its subtitle the book steers us to think about key educational issues in relation to mlearning and through illustrations from case studies, research projects, and reports the reader will find pointers to opportunities for further exploration.

Important aspects of educational practice are covered in chapters on assessment, activity management, and ethical issues. One of the great challenges in understanding mlearning, i.e. the role of mobile digital devices in education, is that the environment in which it operates is so fast moving that even as this book is published the topics have already moved on. This is fairly easy to see in relation to technical features but also in relation to ethical issues where, in the realm of public debate and policy making, there is often considerable turbulence.

Read the full review here ...
Diary Dates

ITTE
  • Next ITTE Committee meeting: February 8th at Sheffield University
Events
  • 15-27 March 2018: Education Show. NEC, Birmingham
  • 24-27 Jan 2018: Bettshow. ExCeL, London
Conferences
Copyright © 2015 ITTE All rights reserved.
Our mailing address is:
newsletter@itte.org.uk

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can
update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list






This email was sent to <<Email Address>>
why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences
Association for Information Technology in Education · 27 Old Gloucester Street · LONDON, WC1N 3AX · United Kingdom

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp