James Clear • 8 min read
Extremely interesting take on using the Stoics’ idea of inversion (considering the opposite of your desired result) and applying that thinking skill to art, innovation, project management, productivity, etc.
You can learn just as much from identifying what doesn't work as you can from spotting what does. What are the mistakes, errors, and flubs that you want to avoid? Inversion is not about finding good advice, but rather about finding anti-advice. It teaches you what to avoid.
The Globe and Mail • 7 min
Bit of a weird journey in that article but the first part rings true; today we read books less, and probably differently. The second part is worth pondering; was the book format a temporary ‘thing’? To be replaced by something else?
Books have always been time machines, in a sense. Today, their time-machine powers are even more obvious – and even more inspiring. They can transport us to a pre-internet frame of mind. Those solitary journeys are all the more rich for their sudden strangeness.
Gustavo Razzetti • 9 min read
The article might have resonated more with us if the idea of “learning is painful” had been replaced with the probably more realistic “learning is hard.” Read as such, it becomes a helpful piece and offers some good paths for pushing through those painful / hard moments of a learning curve and for exercising your brain.
Literally and metaphorically. Don’t stick with the first answer you’ve found. Listen to different arguments. Read more than one article or book on the same topic. Train your brain to learn, not to stick to the effortless answer. Challenge your brain not to default to the easiest way out.
|