1. Tech for Good vs. Coronavirus: What we learned from the Meetup 💪
We may be missing Toast Ale and mega-packs of cheese swirls, but our virtual event last night proved that physical presence is no barrier to awesome people sharing how tech can be used to fight the pandemic. The aim of the meetup was to map what is going on, facilitate cooperation and cast our eyes to the post-COVID future. We heard insightful speeches by Nathan Young, co-founder of the Coronavirus Tech Handbook, Mia Millman, responsible for delivering the Techforce 19 programme, and Cat Ainsworth, Co-Founder of Dot Project.
Ahead of the event, BGV published an article summing up the key means by which tech is being used effectively and responsibly to reduce the impact of COVID-19. One thing that became immediately apparent in conversations with attendants was the scale and speed at which people are adapting their work - or starting new projects - to address the resulting effects of of the pandemic.
It’d be an injustice to squeeze three hours of fruitful conversation into a handful of paragraphs. Instead here is the crowdsourced Google document where people shared their activities, views, projects and announcements. For those who couldn’t attend, we’ll be releasing a video of the speeches and a follow-up article very soon.
2. Contact Tracing: Debate Developments 👁️
For the past few weeks, we have been keeping tabs on the evolving debate around contact tracing tools. The New Yorker released an overview of the debate as it takes shape in the US. The final picture remains ambiguous, but there are some new voices in the conversation. Here’s a quick summary:
-
Negative assessments
-
Positive Assessments
For a deeper dive on this topic, here’s a paper from Cornell University on framing and addressing the ethical challenges relating to digital tools to fight COVID-19.
|