Copy

How Grand-Aunt D’ Helped Develop A Whole New Principle


Last week, I shared a flyer on our social media pages about the neighbour principle as the excellent Lord Atkin (yeah, I am a big fan of Lord Atkin) explained it. For those of you that missed it, here’s a chance to catch up.

I promised to share the case that beget the neighbour principle in the next newsletter and a Lannister always pays his debt.  😉

Donoghue v. Stevenson

Long long ago, old Aunt Donoghue had decided to hang out with her friend at the local bar one fine evening to catch-up with town gossip, as their custom was.Her friend had ordered a ginger beer for Aunt D which came in a bottle not made of clear glass. Aunt D kept pouring the contents into a cup that she drank from. As she poured the final contents, a decomposing snail fell out of the glass of 🍺. Having consumed most of the content, Aunt D fell ill and was diagnosed with gastroenteritis.

Since Aunt D had not purchased the 🍺 herself, she could not see Sir Stevenson, the manufacturer for a breach of contract however, he was liable for negligence as he was responsible for the integrity of his product regardless of the consumer.

 

Also, it was held by the court that manufacturers owe a duty to end consumers/users of their products to take reasonable care.The question then arose, to whom exactly does an individual owe a duty of care?To which Lord Atkin had this wonderful answer:

 

“The rule that you are to love your neighbour becomes in law, you must not injure your neighbour; and the lawyer's question, Who is my neighbour? receives a restricted reply. You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour.

Who, then, in law, is my neighbour? The answer seems to be – persons who are so closely and directly affected by my act that I ought reasonably to have them in contemplation as being so affected when I am directing my mind to the acts or omissions which are called in question."

This tempts me to go on into another very interesting arm of the tort of negligence but I’ll stop here for now. You should follow our social media handles i.e. Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and LinkedIn so you don’t miss out on the next bit.

MAXIM OF THE WEEK: Consensus ad idem
 
This is the foundation of any contractual relationship. For any contract to be valid, the parties have to be in agreement on the terms of the contract.

 
 
Zyden Activities 
 

Last week at Zyden, we sealed a Franchise deal for our client, helped one of our corporate clients restructure to fit the evolving global realities, helped a client secure an Ambassador for the brand among other countless SME and Start-Up legal solutions.

 

Visit our blog at www.zydenlegal.com for more on what we published. We will be sharing exciting news soon (Small business owners should be excited 🤫).


Don't forget to subscribe to our mailing list.



 
Facebook
Twitter
Website
Email
LinkedIn






This email was sent to <<Email Address>>
why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences
Zyden Consult · www.zydenlegal.com · Lagos 100211 · Nigeria

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp