In music, there’s a concept known as counterpoint. It refers to a part in a musical piece that harmonizes with another part, even though it may feature a different rhythm and melody. Listening to any one part in isolation may hint at the whole, but can’t replace it. The ensemble of two (or more) parts make the piece; having access to only one leads to a diminished experience.
I find listening to counterpoint a useful analogy for understanding reality. If our goal is to make better decisions, we must open our ears to the “whole piece.” This is hard to do. To begin with, listening to one part is much easier than listening to several — especially if they don’t move in parallel. Also, one of the parts may resonate strongly with us. Today’s information environments make it easy for us to tune out the other parts — and so we do. Then when we hear the whole, we think, “That can’t be right!”
Lately, I’ve seen perspectives from sources I trust that confound my understanding of social media, AI, business objectives, and more. Some of these issues are at the core of Living in Information, so my gut impulse is to think, “That can’t be right!” When this thought arises, I check myself: What if I'm not listening to the whole piece? I don’t want to be “right” if that means I’ll make bad decisions. Reality is complex and multi-layered, so I'm actively listening for counterpoints.
|