Learn about SPN affiliated project activities and milestones. SPN affiliated projects focus on specific aspects of software preservation/curation that support the strategic goals of SPN.
|
|
Timeline: January 2018 – June 2020
Funder(s): Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
Awardee: Yale University
|
|
The EaaSI Team has been all over the country and the globe these past couple months, raising awareness and seeking new opportunities to use emulation for access to born-digital materials. We're coming into the home stretch of this phase of the project and are seeing the results of our labor as the nodes in the EaaSI Network begin to create their own emulation environments for research and teaching. To see an example of this work and learn more about our travels, click on through...
Read the complete update here!
|
|
Timeline: June 2017 – May 2020
Funder(s): Institute for Museum and Library Services #RE-95-17-0058-17
Awardee: CalPoly State University
|
|
Ever active, members of the FCoP cohort are working on several upcoming software preservation outreach activities with a focus on research data curators and technologists. Cohort proposals were accepted by the International Digital Curation Conference (IDCC) and Code4Lib. The FCoP Blog Reflection Series continues with published posts by University of Illinois and Georgia Tech. Dr. Amelia Acker shares her last field report from her visit to the University of Virginia, as well as reactions to a recent researcher workshop on mapping collaborative workflows (using her interviews with FCoP team members from three field sites).
Read the complete update here!
|
|
Timeline: January 2017 - June 2020
Funder(s): Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
Awardee: Association of Research Libraries
|
|
All SCOTUS, All the Time! Edition
The Supreme Court of the United States (that's long for SCOTUS) has taken up residence at the center of SPN's law and policy agenda thanks to two cases. One could change the stakes for all uses of in-copyright works at public institutions, while the other could change the scope of software copyright and the shape of fair use in general for decades to come.
The court announced last week that it would take up perhaps the most epic software copyright battle ever, Oracle V. Google. The case revolves around Google's use of certain elements of Java in its open source Android mobile operating system. Oracle sued Google alleging copyright infringement, and Google made two main defenses. The Project DisCo blog has a nice, quick summary of the case.
First, they argued that the Java portions used in Android should not be subject to copyright because it is part of a "system or method of operation," which the law excludes from copyright in Section 102(b). Lower courts have long recognized that not all computer code qualifies for copyright protection, but the precise boundaries could be clarified (or muddled) by the SCOTUS in this case. Second, Google argued that its repurposing of portions of Java in Android constituted fair use. Google won both arguments at the trial level, but the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed, twice.
Now the Supreme Court has taken up both issues. This will be the first SCOTUS opinion on software copyright ever, and the first fair use case since 1994. Suffice to say, the stakes in this case could be quite high for SPN members. We will look for opportunities to submit or join an effective amicus brief to ensure that preservation concerns are represented in the case, and of course we will keep you updated as the case moves forward.
If you want a deep dive on the second case, Allen v. Cooper, check out our blog post about it from earlier this fall. The TL;DR version is that this case is about whether state governments and state institutions (including universities (like mine!) and museums) are immune from copyright damages under the 11th Amendment to the Constitution. SPN joined an excellent amicus brief in the case. On November 5, the author of that brief, Jonathan Band, joined us for our November members-only Law and Policy video chat. Oral argument had taken place at the Supreme Court that morning, and Jonathan was in the room, so he reported back on how the argument unfolded.
Predicting outcomes from oral arguments is notoriously tricky, but Jonathan's impressions echoed others I've heard, namely that the justices were wrestling with the issue and may look for a middle path that puts states on the hook for egregious activity, but protects them in more innocent or ambiguous circumstances. The court could decide the case at any time throughout the term, though it is unlikely to be among the controversial cases that are typically released at the very end, in June or July. Watch this space for updates and analysis.
|
|
The Software Preservation Network (SPN) facilitates and supports software preservation efforts. SPN preserves software through community engagement, infrastructure support, and knowledge generation in five core activity areas including Law & Policy Advocacy, Metadata & Standards Development, Training & Education, Research-in-Practice, and Technological Infrastructure.
|
|
Do you appreciate the work that SPN has been doing over the last several years to broaden participation and ensure lawful preservation, sharing, and reuse of software? Would you like to SPN to continue its work of coordination, research, advocacy, and capacity building? Do you have ideas or a vision for the future of software preservation that you would like to see realized through the SPN community?
If you answered “Yes” to any of these questions, then consider supporting our work through membership or sponsorship. To learn more about the benefits of membership and sponsorship, visit: https://www.softwarepreservationnetwork.org/get-involved/
To join, download, complete and submit your SPN Participation Agreement to <jess.farrell@educopia.org>.
|
|
Twitter: @softpresnetwork
Web: www.softwarepreservationnetwork.org
Email: contact@softwarepreservationnetwork.org
Subscribe: https://groups.google.com/d/forum/software-preservation-network
|
|
|
|
|