I am excited to announce that the major legislative initiative I have been working on over the past several months--the creation of the Office of Inspector General--was passed by the Atlanta City Council unanimously on February 4, and signed into law by Mayor Bottoms on February 6. The Inspector General legislation is the culmination of a package of reform legislation that has been passed over the last two years to address deficiencies in the City's operations that have allowed for unacceptable behavior to take place. You can read more about the other pieces of reform legislation in the legislative update article below.
I have received numerous questions about the Inspector General legislation, so wanted to take some space in this newsletter to give a comprehensive review of what this office and the IG will do. I also did an interview about the Inspector General with WABE Closer Look's Rose Scott, which you can listen to here if you missed it.
Q: What is the purpose of the Office of Inspector General?
A: The Office of Inspector General will house those functions within the City that are charged with rooting out fraud, waste, and abuse, and assuring that elected officials, City employees, individuals serving on City boards, and City vendors are all held accountable to complying with the law.
Q: Who will appoint the Inspector General?
A: The Board of Ethics and Compliance will become the Board of the Office of Inspector General and will oversee the appointment, performance, and removal of the Inspector General and Ethics Officer. This is an independent board, comprised of members selected by:
(1) the Atlanta Bar Association,
(2) the Gate City Bar Association,
(3) the Atlanta Business League,
(4) the Metro Atlanta Chamber of Commerce,
(5) the Atlanta-Fulton County League of Women Voters,
(6) the Atlanta Planning Advisory Board,
(7) the seven major colleges/universities within the City,
(8) the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, and
(9) the Georgia Society of Certified Public Accountants. Neither the Mayor nor City Council has any authority to hire, fire, or influence the performance of the IG or Ethics Officer.
Q: What are the qualifications for the IG?
A: The Inspector General must be an attorney with at least 10 years of experience and be admitted to the Georgia Bar (or gain admission within 18 months after hire). In addition, the IG must have at least 5 years of investigatory experience.
Q: What functions fall under the Office of Inspector General?
A: There are three divisions in the Office of Inspector General: (1) Compliance, (2) Ethics, and (3) Independent Procurement Review ("iPro"). The Inspector General will be the head of the Compliance and iPro divisions. The Ethics Officer will continue to head the Ethics division.
Q: What is the purpose of the Compliance division?
A: As head of the Compliance division, the Inspector General will have the jurisdiction to investigate and take appropriate action where fraud, waste, or abuse is detected by:
(1) The City Auditor with respect to the performance and financial operation of all departments, offices, boards, activities and agencies of the city;
(2) An iPro Division review;
(3) the Inspector General on their own determination; and
The IG also has jurisdiction over allegations of violations of the personnel code, procurement code, and transparency code against:
a. Elected officials;
b. Employees appointed or hired directly by an elected official;
c. Members of any city boards, authorities, commissions, etc. having city representation, whether created or appointed to by the city, and any employees thereof; and
d. Hearing officers.
In addition to conducting investigations into the above, the Inspector General shall conduct education and training regarding matters within its jurisdiction.
The IG shall have the power to issue subpoenas to assist in its investigations.
Q: What are the possible penalties if an investigation by the Inspector General determines there has been a violation of city code?
A: Any intentional violation of a matter under the jurisdiction of the Office of the Inspector General, or the furnishing of false or misleading information to the Office of the Inspector General, or the failure to follow a written ethics opinion rendered by the Ethics Officer, or the failure to comply with a subpoena issued by the Inspector General or the Ethics Officer pursuant to this Article shall subject the violator to any one or more of the following:
a. Administrative sanction of not more than $1,000.00 assessed by the Office of the Inspector General;
b. Public reprimand by the Office of the Inspector General; and
c. Prosecution by the city solicitor and a fine of up to $1,000.00 per violation and up to six months imprisonment, whether the official or employee is elected or appointed, paid or unpaid.
(2) With regard to violations by employees, the IG may also recommend further disciplinary actions.
(3) With regard to violations by vendors and board members, the IG may recommend to the Chief Procurement Officer any one or more of the following:
a. Suspension of a contractor; and
b. Disqualification or debarment from contracting or subcontracting with the city.
(4) The value of any gratuity (public money inappropriately paid for a non-public purpose) may be required to be paid back.
Q: What is the purpose of the Ethics division?
A: The Ethics Officer is responsible for
(1) Educating and training all city officials and employees on the code of ethics of the city, which primarily deals with financial disclosure requirements and conflicts of interest;
(2) Advising officials and employees regarding disclosure statements and reviewing them to ensure full and complete financial reporting;
(3) Investigating any failure to comply or investigating any related issues, including the furnishing of false or misleading information;
(4) Evaluating and investigating ethics complaints against public officer and employees.
The Ethics Officer shall have the power to issue subpoenas to assist in its investigations.
Q: Who is the Ethics Officer?
A: The current Ethics Officer is Jabu Sengova. She reports to the Board of the Office of Inspector General, formerly known as the Board of Ethics and Independent Compliance. More information about the Ethics Officer and Ethics Division can be found here.
Q: What is the purpose of the iPro division?
A: For all contracts over $1 million dollars, the City code now requires the iPro division to conduct an independent review and issue an Independent Procurement Review Report to the council confirming that the contract file is complete and identifying any areas of perceived deficiencies. This function was created by City Council in 2018 and put into effect in 2019, and provides City Council with much needed additional information about large contracts. This function had previously been housed in the Office of City Auditor and will be transferred to the Office of the IG.
Q: Will the City still have an Auditor?
A: Yes, The City will continue to have an independent auditor (currently Amanda Noble). The Auditor is responsible for departmental audits and overseeing the outside audit of the City's financials. The City Auditor reports to an Independent Audit Committee. The iPro function was originally housed within the Audit Department, but will be moved to the Office of IG. You can find out more about the City Auditor here.
Q: When will all of this happen?
A: The Board of the Office of Inspector General has begun the process of starting the search for candidates for Inspector General. The Department is partially funded this fiscal year to allow it to be staffed, and will be fully funded in the new fiscal year beginning June 1, 2020.
|