Copy
Today's top new stories about fair courts & judicial independence.
View this email in your browser
FAIR COURTS MEDIA MONITORING
Thursday

April 09, 2020
 

Social Media Highlight

RT Leah Greenberg -  The Supreme Court has started issuing decisions remotely in order to protect their own safety. 

One of their first remote decisions was that Wisconsin voters will have to show up in person and risk their lives if they want their votes counted.
 

Top News

WE NEED YOUR HELP: We are conducting a survey to hear your feedback on our morning news clips. You should have received an email with an unique link in your inbox to complete the survey. If you need any help accessing your unique link to the survey, please let me know.

Curating and sending these clips emails takes a significant amount of our team’s time and we want to learn how to best provide our entire movement with a snapshot of the daily news. The deadline to complete the survey is Tuesday, April 14.


The Supreme Court Has Chosen Reckless Partisanship (The Atlantic) “In this grim pandemic spring, as a worried nation has shut down, political leaders such as New York Governor Andrew Cuomo and (belatedly) President Donald Trump have signaled that the government is still open. Letter carriers, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention scientists, health-care workers, and law-enforcement personnel are among the government employees risking their lives to make sure that essential functions do not collapse.

Conspicuously missing from this roll of honor is the Supreme Court of the United States, which, when social distancing and lockdowns spread across the nation, simply closed its doors, largely ceased operations, and disappeared. The Court has, as of last Friday, canceled two months’ worth of oral argument and provided no word on when, or how, it will take up its calendar again. “The Court will consider a range of scheduling options and other alternatives if arguments cannot be held in the Courtroom before the end of the Term,” the official website explains unhelpfully.”

Pressure mounts on Supreme Court to reconvene virtually, hear case over Trump's tax returns (The Washington Times) “Millions of Americans are working remotely — why can’t the Supreme Court?

According to a new poll, Americans want to see the court, which has been shuttered by the COVID-19 pandemic, back at work — remotely if need be — hearing oral arguments, including for highly watched cases concerning President Trump’s financial records.

In the PSB Research poll, 72% of Americans said the justices should hear oral arguments virtually and 61% want those arguments livestreamed, according to the Fix the Court, an advocacy group pushing for greater judicial transparency that commissioned the survey.”
SUPREME COURT
Supreme Court expected to weigh in on Texas’ emergency coronavirus abortion restriction
CNBC - April 8

Budowsky: SCOTUS mocks COVID-19 warnings in Wisconsin
The Hill - April 8

Citing COVID-19, High Court Litigators Seek Extensions
Law360.com - April 8
FEDERAL COURTS
Federal judge expands Florida legal fight over right to vote to include 430,000 felons
Miami Herald - April 8

No more games on felon voting rights in Florida | Editorial
Tampa Bay Times - April 8

Trump Judge’s Radical Decision Lets States Suspend Abortion Rights
Rewire.News - April 8

Public can now listen to St. Louis federal court hearings by phone
St. Louis Post-Dispatch - April 8 
STATE COURTS

Minnesota

Do you know someone who should receive this email? Have them sign up here.


rethinkmedia.org | facebook | twitter

2039 Shattuck Ave., Suite 401 | Berkeley | CA 94704 
777 6th Street NW, 9th Floor, Suites #114 and #115 | Washington, DC | 20001

update your email preferences  | past issues | forward to a friend






This email was sent to <<Email Address>>
why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences
ReThink Media · 2443 Fillmore St #380-7140 · San Francisco, CA 94115-1814 · USA