FEATURED STORY            

MONDAY, DECEMBER 10, 2018

U.S.-CHINA TENSIONS RISE OVER ARREST OF HUAWEI EXEC

Over the weekend, the Chinese government summoned both the U.S. and Canadian ambassadors in Beijing to demand the release of Meng Wanzhou, chief financial officer of Chinese telecom giant Huawei. Wanzhou, who was arrested while traveling through Vancouver on December 1, is set to appear at a bail hearing today. U.S. prosecutors are seeking to have her extradited to face charges that she took part in a scheme to help her company circumvent U.S. sanctions on selling technology to Iran.

Wanzhou’s detention has raised the pressure on Huawei, which Washington believes poses a national security threat because of its links to the Chinese military. U.S. officials are pushing allies to avoid using the company’s equipment. U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) has said he will introduce legislation to bar Huawei from being able to operate in the United States. (NYT, WSJ, FT, CNN)

  HACKERS                                          

Quora: The Q&A website said that an unknown third-party was able to access virtually every data point the company keeps on its 100 million users, including names, email addresses, passwords, and data imported from linked networks like Facebook and Google. (Gizmodo)

 

NRCC: The FBI is investigating a cyber breach at the National Republican Congressional Committee--the House GOP campaign arm--that took place during the recent midterm races. The email accounts of four senior aides at the NRCC were spied on for several months, party officials said. (Politico)

Marriott: Investigators have found clues that suggest that the Chinese government may have supported the hackers behind the massive breach at the hotel chain. Although analysts cautioned that multiple hacking groups could have been inside the company’s networks for years. (Reuters)


  COURTS                                          

China: As soon as this week, U.S. prosecutors could unseal criminal charges against hackers linked to the Chinese government who are suspected of engaging in a multiyear scheme to break into U.S. technology companies. Federal officials have described the cyberespionage campaign as one of the most damaging orchestrated by Beijing to date. (WSJ)

Assange: Ecuador is putting more pressure on the WikiLeaks founder to leave its embassy in London, where he has sought refuge since 2012. President Lenín Moreno said the UK has provided sufficient guarantees that Assange would not be extradited to face the death penalty abroad. Assange faces sex crimes charges in Sweden that he believes are a ploy to have him extradited to the United States. (NYT)


  ON THE HILL                                    

Google: CEO Sundar Pichai is set to testify on Tuesday before the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, where analysts say he will face tough questions from Democrats about Russia’s online misinformation efforts and the growing power of U.S. tech giants. (NYT)


  PRIVATE SECTOR                             

Facebook: British lawmakers released hundreds of internal Facebook emails that reportedly show executives discussing ways to undermine competitors, obscure their collection of user data, and ensure corporate profit growth. The documents were seized by a British parliamentary committee as part of a larger investigation into Facebook’s practices. (NYT)

 

Amazon: The online retailer has fired several employees in the U.S. and India suspected of having helped supply disreputable merchants with inside information. The move follows a Wall Street Journal report in September that Amazon was investigating suspected data leaks and bribes of its employees. (WSJ)

Microsoft: The company called for world governments to regulate the use of facial recognition, and has put out its own ethical principles for the use of the technology, including a ban on unlawful discrimination. (Reuters)


  THE WORLD                                     

Australia: Lawmakers passed a controversial encryption bill requiring tech companies to provide law enforcement and security agencies with access to encrypted communications. Critics say the law will erode the public’s privacy and is written in a vague way that will lead to abuses. (NYT)

EU: Member governments approved draft rules allowing states to access electronic evidence on suspected criminals from telecom providers across borders. Telecoms would have to comply within 10 days or face steep fines. Some governments, including Germany, opposed the measure saying that some states with little civil rights protections could abuse the mechanism. Before it can come into force, the directive will be subject to further negotiation. (FT)  

MUST READS

The Apps That Track You and Can’t Forget: “As smartphones have become ubiquitous and technology more accurate, an industry of snooping on people’s daily habits has spread and grown more intrusive...These companies sell, use or analyze the data to cater to advertisers, retail outlets and even hedge funds seeking insights into consumer behavior. It’s a hot market, with sales of location-targeted advertising reaching an estimated $21 billion this year,” write authors at the New York Times.

 

How Huawei Used the UK to Become a Global Giant: “While Britain has become one of the most vocal critics of Huawei’s penetration into western telecoms systems in the run-up to the arrest of the company’s chief financial officer this week, it was also the country where it made its global reputation. From an obscure equipment maker in southern China with only one international contract of note — with Hong Kong’s Hutchison Whampoa — Huawei was able to use its BT work to legitimise its systems in other European markets and become the world’s largest maker of telecoms equipment,” writes Nic Fildes in the Financial Times.

Don’t Shut Down the Biggest Jihad Archive: “I believe that Jihadology is different and should remain open to all. It enjoys moral safe-harbor, first of all, because unlike YouTube or Facebook it accepts no advertising and earns no click-based revenue. ([Aaron Y.] Zelin offers translation services for a fee, but access to his archive is gratis.) No one profits from his collection. Second, he presents the specimens without endorsement or, indeed, explicit disapproval; unlike YouTube, it does not “recommend” videos, and unlike Facebook, it doesn’t favor certain pieces over others based on their popularity or clicks. The Web site is as close as one can have to a bare, unadorned catalogue, coded only by source (Islamic State, Al Qaeda, Al Shabaab, etc.) and date,” writes Graeme Wood in the Atlantic.







 

Center on National Security
Fordham University School of Law
150 W. 62nd St. 7th Floor
New York, NY 10023 US
Copyright © 2016 Center on National Security, All rights reserved.