Copy
Ellis County GOP Newsletter - December 2018
View this email in your browser
My Christmas Wish For Ellis County...
 

Randy Bellomy, Ellis County Chairman
I pray for there to be no more property taxes and no one would be put off their land or homestead for lack being able to pay. We need a better way of financing the needs of our state and schools and not burden one segment of our population. 
 
Todd Little, Ellis County Judge-Elect
Merry Christmas to you and your family this holiday season. May Christ continue to be the ultimate gift in your daily life. My hope for Ellis County is that our county can be a place to heal from the past and provide a conduit of transparency, humility, and be a helpful resource for its citizens and their basic needs.

Krystal Valdez, Ellis County Clerk-Elect
Wishing you and your family health, happiness, peace and prosperity, now and in the New Year. May you have a Holy and Blessed Christmas.

Jackie Miller, Jr., Justice of the Peace, Precinct 2
Peace on earth and goodwill to men.

Paul D. Perry, County Commissioner, Precinct 3
My Christmas wish is that during the hustle and bustle, Ellis Countians will have time to rest in their faith and with their friends and families during the holidays.

Melanie Reed, Ellis County District Clerk
To have a prosperous new year, best wishes to all newly elected officials and for all of our actions to bring honor to God. 

 

Just Leave Christmas Alone
by Charles Krauthammer

Washington Post, December 17, 2004 

Although this was written 14 years ago, it is appropriate for today. Thank you, Charles.

"Holiday celebrations where Christmas music is being sung make people feel different, and because it is such a majority, it makes the minority feel uncomfortable."
-- Mark Brownstein, parent, Maplewood, N.J., supporting the school board's ban on religious music in holiday concerts.

"You want my advice? Go back to Bulgaria."
-- Humphrey Bogart, "Casablanca"

It is Christmastime, and what would Christmas be without the usual platoon of annoying pettifoggers rising annually to strip Christmas of any Christian content? With some success:

School districts in New Jersey and Florida ban Christmas carols. The mayor of Somerville, Mass., apologizes for "mistakenly" referring to the town's "holiday party" as a "Christmas party." The Broward and Fashion malls in South Florida put up a Hanukah menorah but no nativity scene. The manager of one of the malls explains: Hanukah commemorates a battle and not a religious event, though he hastens to add, "I really don't know a lot about it." He does not. Hanukah commemorates a miracle, and there is no event more "religious" than a miracle.

The attempts to de-Christianize Christmas are as absurd as they are relentless. The United States today is the most tolerant and diverse society in history. It celebrates all faiths with an open heart and open-mindedness that, compared to even the most advanced countries in Europe, are unique.

Yet more than 80 percent of Americans are Christian, and probably 95 percent of Americans celebrate Christmas. Christmas Day is an official federal holiday, the only day of the entire year when, for example, the Smithsonian museums are closed. Are we to pretend that Christmas is nothing but an orgy of commerce in celebration of . . . what? The winter solstice?

I personally like Christmas because, since it is a day that for me is otherwise ordinary, I get to do nice things, such as covering for as many gentile colleagues as I could when I was a doctor at Massachusetts General Hospital. I will admit that my generosity had its rewards: I collected enough chits on Christmas Day to get reciprocal coverage not just for Yom Kippur but for both days of Rosh Hashana and my other major holiday, Opening Day at Fenway.

Mind you, I've got nothing against Hanukah, although I am constantly amused -- and gratified -- by how American culture has gone out of its way to inflate the importance of Hanukah, easily the least important of Judaism's seven holidays, into a giant event replete with cards, presents and public commemorations as a creative way to give Jews their Christmas equivalent.

Some Americans get angry at parents who want to ban carols because they tremble that their kids might feel "different" and "uncomfortable" should they, God forbid, hear Christian music sung at their school. I feel pity. What kind of fragile religious identity have they bequeathed their children that it should be threatened by exposure to carols?

I'm struck by the fact that you almost never find Orthodox Jews complaining about a Christmas creche in the public square. That is because their children, steeped in the richness of their own religious tradition, know who they are and are not threatened by Christians celebrating their religion in public. They are enlarged by it.

It is the more deracinated members of religious minorities, brought up largely ignorant of their own traditions, whose religious identity is so tenuous that they feel the need to be constantly on guard against displays of other religions -- and who think the solution to their predicament is to prevent the other guy from displaying his religion, rather than learning a bit about their own.

To insist that the overwhelming majority of this country stifle its religious impulses in public so that minorities can feel "comfortable" not only understandably enrages the majority but commits two sins. The first is profound ungenerosity toward a majority of fellow citizens who have shown such generosity of spirit toward minority religions.

The second is the sin of incomprehension -- a failure to appreciate the uniqueness of the communal American religious experience. Unlike, for example, the famously tolerant Ottoman Empire or the generally tolerant Europe of today, the United States does not merely allow minority religions to exist at its sufferance. It celebrates and welcomes and honors them.

America transcended the idea of mere toleration  in 1790 in Washington's letter to the Newport synagogue, one of the lesser known glories of the Founding: "It is now no more that toleration is spoken of, as if it was by the indulgence of one class of people, that another enjoyed the exercise of their inherent natural rights."

More than two centuries later, it is time that members of religious (and anti-religious) minorities, as full citizens of this miraculous republic, transcend something too: petty defensiveness.

Merry Christmas. To all.
 

 

Why You Should Care About The Next Texas Speaker of the House.
by Ben Philpott


The top three elected officials in Texas are the governor, lieutenant governor and speaker of the House. But you didn't find that last official on the Nov. 6 ballot, because we, the voters of Texas, don't get to vote for speaker.

How does a speaker get picked?
Let's back up a bit. The Texas House comprises 150 members, voted into office from their local districts. Each district has about 160,000 people.
On the first day of the legislative session, the 150 members pick one of their own to preside over the House. That person is the speaker. The speaker usually comes from the party that holds the majority in the House. The 2019 session will consist of 83 Republicans and 67 Democrats.

What can speakers do?
Even though the speaker of the House isn't elected by a statewide vote, he or she is as powerful as the lieutenant governor.

That explains nothing. Can you elaborate?
Sure, that power includes the ability to assign members to all the committees in the House and pick the chairs of each. The speaker also directs which bills go to which committees. And it's a speaker-picked group of lawmakers on what's called the Calendars Committee that determines which bills make it to the House floor for debate.

So, basically, if the speaker doesn't want a bill to come up for a vote, it won't. We saw Speaker Joe Straus use this power last year to stop a bill that would have restricted transgender bathroom use.

You could argue the speaker has more power than the governor, because while the governor does have the bully pulpit of the executive branch, the governor can't write bills. He or she can only wait for them to arrive and then sign or veto them.

But wait, I still don't care.
During the last couple of legislative sessions, we've seen a dramatic divide between the Texas House and the Texas Senate. The Senate, led by conservative firebrand Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, has focused on social issues and Republican red meat. The body has passed legislation to create a school voucher program, ban abortions and restrict bathroom access. Those bills have died in the House – not exclusively because of, but certainly with help from Speaker Straus.

So now we're going to have a new speaker, and it certainly looks like Angleton Republican Dennis Bonnen will win the job. He announced Monday that he has 109 supporters; he needs only 76.

Bonnen was a close ally of Straus and holds similar views on many pieces of legislation.

But he is his own man and certainly might be more supportive of some of the items coming over from the Senate, while taking a harder line on others.

I'm pretty busy. Can you sum up why I should care in one sentence?
Fine: Whatever makes it to the governor's desk has to go through the House, and the new speaker, who has shown he doesn't always agree with legislation from the Senate, will play a large role in what passes and what doesn't.
 
 

 

A Time For Truth
by Mark Levin, posted on December 11, 2018

1. A sitting president CANNOT be indicted. That’s official DOJ policy since 1973. Neither the Special Counsel nor the SDNY nor Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein can defy that 45-year-old policy.

2. SDNY is NOT expert in campaign finance violations and neither is the Clinton appointed district judge. They rarely handle campaign finance cases. The left-wing media and politicians are regurgitating what the prosecutors have merely filed in their own self-serving brief. The media and others intentionally refuse to look at the actual rules and context. They refuse to even question what these prosecutors have thrown together.

3. The actual campaign rules and context do NOT include Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) or infinite other contracts, payments, arrangements, acts of a private nature, etc. as campaign contributions. This is normal human behavior and was never intended to be regulated or reported. SDNY is dead wrong. And these private payments can be made in any manner or any amount. Again, they’re private payments involving private matters. To underscore, there’s no reporting requirement because they’re not campaign payments made with or without campaign funds.

4. SDNY inclusion of these charges in the Cohen plea deal was a sleazy political and PR attack against the president by an office coordinating with Mueller and aligned with Comey. SDNY knew Cohen would plead. It therefore knew its absurd allegations would not be tested in any courtroom — district, circuit or Supreme Court. If they were tested, SDNY would be hammered like a nail. But it knew the left-wing media and politicians would use the mere over-the-top allegations from its office, with absolutely nothing more, to claim the president committed campaign felonies. No due process. No assumption of innocence. They knew they couldn’t charge a sitting president. Thus, they convict the president in the press, not only an extreme act of professional misconduct but a violation of the very purpose of the DOJ memos banning the indictment of a sitting president while effectively indicting him in the court of public opinion, and watch as untold numbers of media personalities and former members of the SDNY, among others, use this dirty work to predict or demand the president’s indictment and/or impeachment.

5. As for impeachment, NDAs involving wholly private matters occurring before the president was even a candidate and completely unrelated to his office cannot legitimately trigger the constitution’s impeachment clause. Indeed, they could not be more irrelevant. The history of the clause and its “high crimes and misdemeanors” language make it crystal clear that the office and the president’s duties are not affected in any conceivable way by these earlier private contracts. Of course, Jerrold Nadler, another NYC radical, could not care less. He’s more than thrilled to be an executioner in this French Revolution redux. The Constitution be damned. Meanwhile, he and the others wave around the Constitution as if they’re defending it against a tyrant. It is they who are the tyrants.

 

The Story of 'Silent Night'
How a little church in Austria became the birthplace of the famous carol

In 1818, a roving band of actors was performing in towns throughout the Austrian Alps. On December 23 they arrived at Oberndorf, a village near Salzburg where they were to re-enact the story of Christ's birth in the small Church of St. Nicholas.

Unfortunately, the St. Nicholas' church organ wasn't working and would not be repaired before Christmas. (Note: some versions of the story point to mice as the problem; others say rust was the culprit) Because the church organ was out of commission, the actors presented their Christmas drama in a private home. That Christmas presentation of the events in the first chapters of Matthew and Luke put assistant pastor Josef Mohr in a meditative mood. Instead of walking straight to his house that night, Mohr took a longer way home. The longer path took him up over a hill overlooking the village.

From that hilltop, Mohr looked down on the peaceful snow-covered village. Reveling in majestic silence of the wintry night, Mohr gazed down at the glowing Christmas-card like scene. His thoughts about the Christmas play he had just seen made him remember a poem he had written a couple of years before. That poem was about the night when angels announced the birth of the long-awaited Messiah to shepherds on a hillside.

Mohr decided those words might make a good carol for his congregation the following evening at their Christmas eve service. The one problem was that he didn't have any music to which that poem could be sung. So, the next day Mohr went to see the church organist, Franz Xaver Gruber. Gruber only had a few hours to come up with a melody which could be sung with a guitar. However, by that evening, Gruber had managed to compose a musical setting for the poem. It no longer mattered to Mohr and Gruber that their church organ was inoperable. They now had a Christmas carol that could be sung without that organ.

On Christmas Eve, the little Oberndorf congregation heard Gruber and Mohr sing their new composition to the accompaniment of Gruber's guitar.

Weeks later, well-known organ builder Karl Mauracher arrived in Oberndorf to fix the organ in St. Nicholas church. When Mauracher finished, he stepped back to let Gruber test the instrument. When Gruber sat down, his fingers began playing the simple melody he had written for Mohr's Christmas poem. Deeply impressed, Mauracher took copies of the music and words of "Silent Night" back to his own Alpine village, Kapfing. There, two well-known families of singers — the Rainers and the Strassers — heard it. Captivated by "Silent Night," both groups put the new song into their Christmas season repertoire.

The Strasser sisters spread the carol across northern Europe. In 1834, they performed "Silent Night" for King Frederick William IV of Prussia, and he then ordered his cathedral choir to sing it every Christmas eve.

Twenty years after "Silent Night" was written, the Rainers brought the song to the United States, singing it (in German) at the Alexander Hamilton Monument located outside New York City's Trinity Church.

In 1863, nearly fifty years after being first sung in German, "Silent Night" was translated into English (by either Jane Campbell or John Young). Eight years later, that English version made its way into print in Charles Hutchins' Sunday School Hymnal. 

Today the words of "Silent Night" are sung in more than 300 different languages around the world.

 

 



Join the Legacy Circle!

When you become a Legacy Circle member of the Republican Party of Ellis County you will be a vital part of helping us build a powerful and influential presence here.
Your contribution will help keep Ellis County and the great state of Texas, RED!
 
Your valuable contribution will go directly to providing a permanent location for our GOP Headquarters in Ellis County which allows us to do the following:
 
1. Hold our GOP monthly meetings open to all citizens
2. Have training for Precinct Chairman and volunteers
3. Host our ‘Get Out The Vote’ efforts at election time
4. House our resources such as our candidate campaign signs and literature
5. Be a center for town hall meetings to educate and inform our citizens
 
There are several levels of membership – please choose the one that is right for you!
 
Student level contribution - $15
Bronze level contribution - $100
Silver level contribution - $200
Gold level contribution - $500
Platinum level Contribution - $1000


To make a contribution, go to:
http://elliscountygop.org/legacy-circle

 

“The less government interferes with private pursuits, the better for general prosperity."

- Martin Van Buren

CALL FOR ENTRIES
We want to hear from you!
If you would like to submit an article or
Op-Ed column to The Elephant's Ear,
please email Kristina Blake, thinkkristina@gmail.com
Let your voice be heard!
UPCOMING EVENTS

Swearing In Of Elected Officials 
Tuesday, January 1st
10am
Historic Courthouse in Waxahachie
All are welcome!


Ellis County GOP Meeting
Thursday, January 3rd
7pm
610 Water St.
Waxahachie
All are welcome!


ELLIS CO.FUN FACTS

Be an Ellis County Hero!
Adopt or foster a sweet pup or kitten at the Midlothian Animal Shelter - 972-775-7628 or the Ellis County SPCA -  972-935-0756

So many furry friends are waiting for their forever home!



 
PRECINCT SCOOP

Become A Precinct Chairman! 
If you would like to become a Precinct Chairman for your precinct, contact Ellis County GOP Chairman Randy Bellomy
randy@bellomyheatingandair.com




 
Copyright © 2018 Ellis County GOP, All rights reserved.


unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences 

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp