Copy
Learn about the latest and greatest related to complex systems research. More at http://comdig.unam.mx
Complexity Digest
Contents from of the 03/25/2019 edition:


A high-bias, low-variance introduction to Machine Learning for physicists

Machine Learning (ML) is one of the most exciting and dynamic areas of modern research and application. The purpose of this review is to provide an introduction to the core concepts and tools of machine learning in a manner easily understood and intuitive to physicists. The review begins by covering fundamental concepts in ML and modern statistics such as the bias–variance tradeoff, overfitting, regularization, generalization, and gradient descent before moving on to more advanced topics in both supervised and unsupervised learning. Topics covered in the review include ensemble models, deep learning and neural networks, clustering and data visualization, energy-based models (including MaxEnt models and Restricted Boltzmann Machines), and variational methods. Throughout, we emphasize the many natural connections between ML and statistical physics. A notable aspect of the review is the use of Python Jupyter notebooks to introduce modern ML/statistical packages to readers using physics-inspired datasets (the Ising Model and Monte-Carlo simulations of supersymmetric decays of proton–proton collisions). We conclude with an extended outlook discussing possible uses of machine learning for furthering our understanding of the physical world as well as open problems in ML where physicists may be able to contribute.

 

 

A high-bias, low-variance introduction to Machine Learning for physicists

Pankaj Mehta, et al.

Physics Reports

Source: www.sciencedirect.com


share on Twitter Like A high-bias, low-variance introduction to Machine Learning for physicists on Facebook


Network-based prediction of drug combinations

Drug combinations, offering increased therapeutic efficacy and reduced toxicity, play an important role in treating multiple complex diseases. Yet, our ability to identify and validate effective combinations is limited by a combinatorial explosion, driven by both the large number of drug pairs as well as dosage combinations. Here we propose a network-based methodology to identify clinically efficacious drug combinations for specific diseases. By quantifying the network-based relationship between drug targets and disease proteins in the human protein–protein interactome, we show the existence of six distinct classes of drug–drug–disease combinations. Relying on approved drug combinations for hypertension and cancer, we find that only one of the six classes correlates with therapeutic effects: if the targets of the drugs both hit disease module, but target separate neighborhoods. This finding allows us to identify and validate antihypertensive combinations, offering a generic, powerful network methodology to identify efficacious combination therapies in drug development.

 

Network-based prediction of drug combinations
Feixiong Cheng, István A. Kovács & Albert-László Barabási 
Nature Communications volume 10, Article number: 1197 (2019)

Source: www.nature.com


share on Twitter Like Network-based prediction of drug combinations on Facebook


Self-Steering Organization: 6 Mistakes We Made

In this guest blog Nele van Hooste from Board of Innovation speaks about the 6 mistakes they made while introducting a network of sel-managing teams.

Source: corporate-rebels.com


share on Twitter Like Self-Steering Organization: 6 Mistakes We Made on Facebook


“I’ll take care of you,” said the robot. Reflecting upon the legal and ethical aspects of the use and development of social robots for therapy

The insertion of robotic and artificial intelligent (AI) systems in therapeutic settings is accelerating. In this paper, we investigate the legal and ethical challenges of the growing inclusion of social robots in therapy. Typical examples of such systems are Kaspar, Hookie, Pleo, Tito, Robota,Nao, Leka or Keepon. Although recent studies support the adoption of robotic technologies for therapy and education, these technological developments interact socially with children, elderly or disabled, and may raise concerns that range from physical to cognitive safety, including data protection. Research in other fields also suggests that technology has a profound and alerting impact on us and our human nature. This article brings all these findings into the debate on whether the adoption of therapeutic AI and robot technologies are adequate, not only to raise awareness of the possible impacts of this technology but also to help steer the development and use of AI and robot technologies in therapeutic settings in the appropriate direction. Our contribution seeks to provide a thoughtful analysis of some issues concerning the use and development of social robots in therapy, in the hope that this can inform the policy debate and set the scene for further research.

 

“I’ll take care of you,” said the robot

Reflecting upon the legal and ethical aspects of the use and development of social robots for therapy

Eduard Fosch-Villaronga Jordi Albo-Canals

Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics

Source: www.degruyter.com


share on Twitter Like “I’ll take care of you,” said the robot. Reflecting upon the legal and ethical aspects of the use and development of social robots for therapy on Facebook


A unifying framework for interpreting and predicting mutualistic systems

Biological complexity has impeded our ability to predict the dynamics of mutualistic interactions. Here, the authors deduce a general rule to predict outcomes of mutualistic systems and introduce an approach that permits making predictions even in the absence of knowledge of mechanistic details.

Source: www.nature.com


share on Twitter Like A unifying framework for interpreting and predicting mutualistic systems on Facebook


Embodied Dyadic Interaction Increases Complexity of Neural Dynamics: A Minimal Agent-Based Simulation Model

The concept of social interaction is at the core of embodied and enactive approaches to social cognitive processes, yet scientifically it remains poorly understood. Traditionally, cognitive science had relegated all behavior to being the end result of internal neural activity. However, the role of feedback from the interactions between agent and their environment has become increasingly important to understanding behavior. We focus on the role that social interaction plays in the behavioral and neural activity of the individuals taking part in it. Is social interaction merely a source of complex inputs to the individual, or can social interaction increase the individuals’ own complexity? Here we provide a proof of concept of the latter possibility by artificially evolving pairs of simulated mobile robots to increase their neural complexity, which consistently gave rise to strategies that take advantage of their capacity for interaction. We found that during social interaction, the neural controllers exhibited dynamics of higher-dimensionality than were possible in social isolation. Moreover, by testing evolved strategies against unresponsive ghost partners, we demonstrated that under some conditions this effect was dependent on mutually responsive co-regulation, rather than on the mere presence of another agent’s behavior as such. Our findings provide an illustration of how social interaction can augment the internal degrees of freedom of individuals who are actively engaged in participation.

 

Embodied Dyadic Interaction Increases Complexity of Neural Dynamics: A Minimal Agent-Based Simulation Model

Madhavun Candadai, Matt Setzler, Eduardo J. Izquierdo and Tom Froese

Front. Psychol., 21 March 2019 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00540

Source: www.frontiersin.org

A good example of interactions generating relevant novel information that is not present in initial nor boundary conditions, inherently limiting the predictability of complex systems.


share on Twitter Like Embodied Dyadic Interaction Increases Complexity of Neural Dynamics: A Minimal Agent-Based Simulation Model on Facebook


Complexity Applications in Language and Communication Sciences

This book offers insights on the study of natural language as a complex adaptive system. It discusses a new way to tackle the problem of language modeling, and provides clues on how the close relation between natural language and some biological structures can be very fruitful for science. The book examines the theoretical framework and then applies its main principles to various areas of linguistics. It discusses applications in language contact, language change, diachronic linguistics, and the potential enhancement of classical approaches to historical linguistics by means of new methodologies used in physics, biology, and agent systems theory. It shows how studying language evolution and change using computational simulations enables to integrate social structures in the evolution of language, and how this can give rise to a new way to approach sociolinguistics. Finally, it explores applications for discourse analysis, semantics and cognition.

 

Complexity Applications in Language and Communication Sciences

Editors: Massip Bonet, Àngels, Bel-Enguix, Gemma, Bastardas-Boada, Albert

Source: www.springer.com

See Also: Introduction https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330715416_Introduction_Chapter_1 


share on Twitter Like Complexity Applications in Language and Communication Sciences on Facebook


The hipster effect: Why anti-conformists always end up looking the same

Complexity science explains why efforts to reject the mainstream merely result in a new conformity.

Source: www.technologyreview.com


share on Twitter Like The hipster effect: Why anti-conformists always end up looking the same on Facebook


Dynamic organization of flocking behaviors in a large-scale boids model

A simulation of a half-million flock is studied using a simple boids model originally proposed by Craig Reynolds. It was modeled with a differential equation in 3D space with a periodic boundary. Flocking is collective behavior of active agents, which is often observed in the real world (e.g., starling swarms). It is, nevertheless, hard to rigorously define flocks (or their boundaries). First, even within the same swarm, the members are constantly updated, and second, flocks sometimes merge or divide dynamically. To define individual flocks and to capture their dynamic features, we applied a DBSCAN and a non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) to the boid dataset. Flocking behavior has different types of dynamics depending on the size of the flock. A function of different flocks is discussed with the result of NMF analysis.

 

Dynamic organization of flocking behaviors in a large-scale boids model
Norihiro Maruyama Daichi Saito Yasuhiro Hashimoto Takashi Ikegami

Journal of Computational Social Science

Source: link.springer.com


share on Twitter Like Dynamic organization of flocking behaviors in a large-scale boids model on Facebook


Multiplex decomposition of non-Markovian dynamics and the hidden layer reconstruction problem

Elements composing complex systems usually interact in several different ways and as such the interaction architecture is well modelled by a multiplex network. However often this architecture is hidden, as one usually only has experimental access to an aggregated projection. A fundamental challenge is thus to determine whether the hidden underlying architecture of complex systems is better modelled as a single interaction layer or results from the aggregation and interplay of multiple layers. Here we show that using local information provided by a random walker navigating the aggregated network one can decide in a robust way if the underlying structure is a multiplex or not and, in the former case, to determine the most probable number of hidden layers. As a byproduct, we show that the mathematical formalism also provides a principled solution for the optimal decomposition and projection of complex, non-Markovian dynamics into a Markov switching combination of diffusive modes.
We validate the proposed methodology with numerical simulations of both (i) random walks navigating hidden multiplex networks (thereby reconstructing the true hidden architecture) and (ii) Markovian and non-Markovian continuous stochastic processes (thereby reconstructing an effective multiplex decomposition where each layer accounts for a different diffusive mode). We also state and prove two existence theorems guaranteeing that an exact reconstruction of the dynamics in terms of these hidden jump-Markov models is always possible for arbitrary finite-order Markovian and fully non-Markovian processes. Finally, we showcase the applicability of the method to experimental recordings from (i) the mobility dynamics of human players in an online multiplayer game and (ii) the dynamics of RNA polymerases at the single-molecule level.

 

Multiplex decomposition of non-Markovian dynamics and the hidden layer reconstruction problem

Lucas Lacasa, Inés P. Mariño, Joaquín Miguez, Vincenzo Nicosia, Edgar Roldán, Ana Lisica, Stephan W. Grill, Jesús Gómez-Gardeñes

Source: arxiv.org


share on Twitter Like Multiplex decomposition of non-Markovian dynamics and the hidden layer reconstruction problem on Facebook


Self-Organization and Artificial Life

Self-organization can be broadly defined as the ability of a system to display ordered spatio-temporal patterns solely as the result of the interactions among the system components. Processes of this kind characterize both living and artificial systems, making self-organization a concept that is at the basis of several disciplines, from physics to biology to engineering. Placed at the frontiers between disciplines, Artificial Life (ALife) has heavily borrowed concepts and tools from the study of self-organization, providing mechanistic interpretations of life-like phenomena as well as useful constructivist approaches to artificial system design. Despite its broad usage within ALife, the concept of self-organization has been often excessively stretched or misinterpreted, calling for a clarification that could help with tracing the borders between what can and cannot be considered self-organization. In this review, we discuss the fundamental aspects of self-organization and list the main usages within three primary ALife domains, namely "soft" (mathematical/computational modeling), "hard" (physical robots), and "wet" (chemical/biological systems) ALife. Finally, we discuss the usefulness of self-organization within ALife studies, point to perspectives for future research, and list open questions.

 

Self-Organization and Artificial Life
Carlos Gershenson, Vito Trianni, Justin Werfel, Hiroki Sayama

Source: arxiv.org


share on Twitter Like Self-Organization and Artificial Life on Facebook
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp







This email was sent to <<Email Address>>
why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences
Complexity Digest · Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México · Ciudad Universitaria · Mexico City, DF 01000 · Mexico