Copy
“Learning is not attained by chance, it must be sought for with ardor and attended to with diligence.” – Abigail Adams
View this email in your browser
Proper Tack #62 - 19.06.18

Consumer. Party of One.


Some marketers will tell a tale of some dream world where every customer gets their own message on their preferred channels at their desired cadence. But what if personalization wasn't actually the best thing for marketing? What if your brand was stronger by having one clear, consistent message rather than trying perfectly craft a thousand different versions?

That's what we'll tackle today.

🕵️  AdAge wonders aloud whether personalization is ever actually going to be be a major win for companies.

🛒  Shopify released their first 'State of Commerce' report, and I wanted to highlight a few of the best parts.

🍿  And to finish us off, a collection of great stuff I've found the last couple weeks.

If you are enjoying Proper Tack, the best thing you can do is forward this newsletter to anyone you think would enjoy it and ask them to sign up here.

This entry's header palette is The Neighborhood.


1. Will Personalization Ever Truly Fly?

https://adage.com/article/opinion/will-personalization-ever-truly-fly/2173226

Shawn O'Neal wrote a thought-provoking article for AdAge recently about the struggles of personalization in online advertising. Importantly, it's not just about how companies are struggling to execute personalized marketing, but also whether this is really something to strive for.

Betteridge's Law of Headlines may be at play here, but let's not get too cynical just yet. 
"Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no."
 - Ian Betteridge
Marketers have been using demographic segmentation, geo-fencing, customer preferences, and more to target customers for decades. Thanks to digital, modern marketers can now add on-site and in-app behavior to that equation, while also massively increasing the volume of data available on customer preferences and segmentation. To some, the end goal for this is a world of pure one-to-one marketing. Customers see the perfect message for them, in the channel where they are most receptive, and then get a purchase flow that matches all of their expectations.

It's an intoxicating vision. But as O'Neal points out, one that comes with risks.
In trying to achieve one-to-one marketing, we might actually be putting our brands at risk of fragmented messaging, multiple personalities and vapor for brand equity. And even if we actually pull this off, there is a ton of mythology surrounding our ability to successfully execute micro-campaigning at the kind of scale we need to move markets and competitive share.

Often this comes down to simple math. If you target a specific slice of the web population using the powerful segmenting tools at your disposal, you may start with a million prospects. But, for every attribute you apply, you end up slicing that group thinner and thinner. Very quickly, you may find that your sophisticated marketing efforts have led you to a handful of shaving cream enthusiasts in the Pacific Northwest.
I'm going to air my concerns about O'Neal's position first. His use of a YouGov survey on how customers feel about personalized ads is not helpful. If you ask anyone if they like seeing ads the answer is going to be no. If you ask them about something like targeted advertising that has a "creepy" factor to it, I can only expect that negativity to increase. Not surprisingly, the vast majority of respondents also didn't think that they were influenced by marketing, which a century's worth of advertising performance tells us probably isn't true.

Needless to say, I'm not sure a direct survey is the right way to answer the question of efficacy.

I also think, and I believe O'Neal would agree with me here, that targeting is a good thing. Your audience isn't everyone, and your budget likely has some limit. Even Coca-Cola, with a global supply chain, the most powerful brand in the world, and products that appeal to anyone who drinks liquid, isn't going to spend every dollar possible on each marketing campaign. Sprite drinkers are different than Fanta drinkers are different than Dasani drinkers.

But lots of customers share certain traits. This is part of why I'm a particularly big fan of using targeting to exclude segments rather than include them. Even Facebook and Google, with their incredible amounts of data, don't always know how old someone is, or what their household income is.





That's a lot of unknowns in those charts! And it's also borderline criminal how they move "Unknown" to different sides of the graph for different metrics.

Don't let the platforms' inability to identify 100% of their users impact your ability to reach the customers. Rather than include 18-35 year olds, exclude anyone under 18 or over 35, and make sure you get a big audience. Because I also agree with O'Neal that focusing too much on small of segments is a bad thing. Your potential audience is probably larger than you think. And since it relates to this, another shoutout for the great book How Brands Grow.

 

2. Shopify's State of Commerce

https://news.shopify.com/shopify-unveils-first-state-of-commerce-report-242590

Shopify did something really cool this week and published a "State of Commerce" report that takes all of the data that they were able to collect from surveys of 3,800 Shopify merchants and 2,600 customers and presents findings about the current world of online purchasing.

One of my favorite parts about this report was how they broke down buyers into four different personalities: Trend Trackers, Engaged Explorers, Savvy Searchers, and Pragmatic Planners.

Each of these personalities was quantified as a percentage of the total customer universe, and then their motivation and response to marketing were qualified.



There are additional findings in the report as well like how the Explorers and Planners have the highest brand loyalty. It would have been really cool if they gave more information about exactly how they defined and populated these buckets (are Trend Trackers defined by some set of behavior and they happen to be less loyal purchasers, or did they make the less loyal purchasers Trend Trackers) but there is value in thinking about which buying motivation your key customer fits in and how that impacts your marketing.

Another fun part of the report is where they analyze popular product categories across different countries. The "popular everywhere" products are a mixture of things you would expect; relatively low-dollar, small products. These are inexpensive to store and ship, and allow you to easily carry a wide selection as a merchant.
  • Shirts/Tops
  • Shoes
  • Phone Cases
  • Vitamins
  • Books
Where it gets a little more interesting is the products that are super popular in individual countries. For instance, Germans love dance dresses (think Oktoberfest), the French are big perfume buyers, and Singaporeans (yes, that's right, I looked it up) are are all about nail polish.

There's nothing earth-shattering in this report, but there are some fun data points and since it's the very first one I expect that there will be some good opportunities to watch how the ecosystem evolves over time.

 

More Good Articles to Sound Interesting


A cartoon monkey, strategy behind book titles, fixing escalators, scheduling planes, and screenwriting. We've got a good one this week.

🐒  It turns out that Curious George was created by a Jewish husband and wife who built a bicycle out of scavenged parts to flee Nazi Germany.

🧐  If you've ever wondered why books have such long subtitles, now you know that you can blame it on SEO.

⏳  Why does it take so long to fix an escalator (totally worth the free account creation)

☢️  Did you know that the writer for Chernobyl a) was randomly matched with Ted Cruz to be college roommates, b) has a House named after him in Game of Thrones, and c) made all of the scripts to Chernobyl freely available!

🛫  Airline scheduling is a science. Here's your primer on flight banking, scissor hubs, and why South American flights are so expensive.

⚽  Whatever happened to Freddy Adu?


Thanks for making it through another ProperTack email. Please forward on to anyone who would enjoy it.

See you next time.
If you enjoyed this content, please consider sharing it
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook
Forward to Friends
If someone referred you to this newsletter and you like it, please consider subscribing
Copyright © 2019 Proper Tack, All rights reserved.

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp