Copy

The Prepared.

About   //   Support
Notes, 2019-08-26.
Hey, it's me again, back for another guest installment. This is a nice time of the year to be offline, so thanks for making an exception here, even if this is as far as you get. As always, if you enjoy this edition, feel free to subscribe to my newsletter about urbanism and technology, Kneeling Bus (or follow me on Twitter).

One theme of my summer—a thread that increasingly connects everything I'm thinking about—has been "externalities." I used to think of externalities as tangible, easily recognizable phenomena like industrial pollution, but broadening that definition to include any byproduct of a system that doesn't remain within the system, whether positive or negative, has caused me to see externalities everywhere. The world is increasingly made up of systems, whether digital, economic, political, or physical; a frequent and pernicious goal of those systems is to capture as many of their benefits as possible while externalizing their negative outputs. The world outside of a given system—the public realm, as traditionally understood—is where everything good and bad that's not captured ends up.

Externalities and the systems that produce them have always existed, but the difference today is that there are more effective tools to control which outputs are captured within a system and which ones escape to affect the outside world. One example of a more subtle kind of externality in the social domain is the kind produced by AirPods, which I wrote about a couple of months ago: They internalize their significant benefits among their own users while incrementally undermining public space. So pay attention to externalities, and for any system you happen to work with or have some degree of control over, consider how well it works for those who don't actually use it. 

The most clicked link in last week's issue (~10% of opens) was a description of Planetary Blocks, wooden cubes containing information about celestial bodies.
The Prepared is supported by people like you.

Infrastructure.

  • Why Vision Zero is the wrong goal for improving street safety in New York, where twice as many cyclist fatalities have already occurred this year than in all of 2018. A convincing argument that the city's approach is too reactive, and thus fails to produce the infrastructure needed to ensure cyclist safety. A positive vision like Utrecht's "We All Cycle" would be more effective.
  • Shade as an urban design issue. An in-depth examination of the uneven distribution of shade in Los Angeles, why it's so important, and the challenges that surround efforts to add new shade infrastructure such as street trees.
  • The recent growth of helicopter travel in the New York region, and the increasing ability of the affluent to simply opt out of public problems like traffic by using their own parallel channels. 


Climate.


Architecture.


Distribution & Logistics.


Tangents.

Thanks as always to our recurring donors for supporting The Prepared.

Love, Drew.

p.s. - I'd love to grab coffee sometime. Drop me a line!
p.p.s. - Whenever possible, we work to encourage inclusivity. Here's how.
The Prepared is brought to you by generous support from


Copyright © 2019 theprepared.org, All rights reserved.


Update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list (if you must). And view it in your browser (if you prefer).