Copy
Logo

Hello friends,

Can you believe it’s almost May? This year is really flying by.

Thanks to those who reached out last week about sharing the survey we’re currently circulating. As a reminder, we’re working with the Center for Media Engagement to conduct research on language in news, particularly that which describes marginalized groups. We’re seeking 600 people who’ve experienced homelessness, incarceration, and/or substance use to take a brief survey (for which they’ll receive a $5 gift card) to assist with this research.

If you know any organizations or groups that might be interested in sharing this survey, please let us know or send them this link. The Reframe team would deeply appreciate it!

Thanks,
Aubrey Nagle
Reframe editor

Were you forwarded this newsletter? Sign up for Freeze Frame here.

Headline Check ✅

Here we analyze and reframe a news headline to demonstrate how this important real estate can be optimized for user experience.

For many American families a living wage is out of reach: Report

The headline above, from ABC news, references the new 2022 County Health Rankings report published by the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute. From the story:

"The data reinforces what we’ve known for some time. People in both rural and urban communities face long-standing barriers, systemic barriers -- avoidable barriers -- that get in the way of groups of people and places in our country from being able to live long and well," Sheri Johnson, co-director of County Health Rankings & Roadmaps and director of the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, told ABC News.

The acknowledgement of these systemic and avoidable barriers makes describing improved economic futures as “out of reach” an odd and fatalistic choice. The report does describe major inequality, but it does not, as far as ABC News reports, suggest it is mysteriously insurmountable or natural to U.S. life. Instead it clearly describes it as essentially man-made. The headline below, from United Press International, makes plain what the solution to this man-made problem of low, unequal wages is: pay increases! (From, one could infer, those creating the inequality.)

Analysis says most U.S. workers need major pay increase to earn living wage

It’s crucial to understand how journalists play a role in establishing what is possible in the public discourse. This is a perfect example of two news outlets highlighting the same problem and framing the potential for that problem to be solved completely differently.

One Good Tweet 🐥

It’s just what it sounds like: a good Tweet that we think everyone should see!

Journalism ethics rule proposal:  The rule that you shouldn't report untruths is more important than the rule that you should protect off-the-record statements.   If someone says trump is a dangerous maniac in private, it's not OK to uncritically report their public praise.

Journalist Adam Davidson’s tweet is in reference to recently leaked tapes from New York Times reporters Alexander Burns and Jonathan Martin. The tapes included Representative Kevin McCarthy and Senator Mitch McConnell privately criticizing Trump and their colleagues in the aftermath of the January 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol. In public, however, they quickly fell back in line with supporting Trump and the rest of the GOP. In that light, Davidson’s proposal seems a more than reasonable addition to journalism ethics.

A Link to Make You Think 🤔

Our must-read of the week.

In journalism, ‘objective’ is a good word with a noble history. But let’s consider ‘distance from neutrality.’

Late last week, Poynter’s Roy Peter Clark released a chapter from his upcoming book that discusses journalistic objectivity and what he calls distances from neutrality. I think his classification of objective, neutral, engaged, advocacy, partisan, and propaganda is a useful measuring stick for journalists struggling to define their work in the post-”objectivity” era. (If we say we’re in that era enough times, we will be, right?)

Read the Story

Tip Line ☎️

Each week we’ll highlight relevant resources and guidance on language and framing.

Since we are in the thick of U.S. state primary season, it feels like as good a time as any to highlight guidance on “horse race” elections coverage. This type of reporting is characterized by a focus on who is likely to win an election, including an emphasis on opinion polls, at the expense of what policies the candidates espouse and whether they’re popular with voters.

Denise-Marie Ordway recently published two new articles at Journalist’s Resource on the topic that are well worth a read (and a forward, and a tweet or two):