Copy
View this email in your browser

May 6, 2022


FEATURED
How to Battle Biden’s Regulatory Leviathan and Win
(Even on LGBT Issues)
Roger Severino
National Review Online

It seems like every other week, a new gender-identity announcement has come out of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). See here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here. This flood was expected after President Biden appointed a leftist, Xavier Becerra, as HHS Secretary and transgender-activist par excellence, Dr. Rachel (formerly Richard) Levine, as Assistant Secretary of Health. But a funny thing happened on the way to transforming HHS into the Department of Health and Gender Services. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), an HHS sub-agency, just abandoned its plans to force millions of people to pay for other people’s transgender treatments by declaring them “essential health benefits” under proposed Obamacare insurance regulations. You may be wondering how this surprising about face came to pass. It was because a dedicated coalition of advocates discovered this radical proposal to transform health care and used nothing but their knowledge and voices to block it.

Here’s how we did it.

Read More
NEW FROM EPPC
Why We Hunger for Beauty
Francis X. Maier
First Things
Read More
Joe and Others After Roe
Stephen P. White
The Catholic Thing
Read More
Our Digital Panopticon
Aaron Kheriaty
Substack
Read More
The Problems of Putting Off Children
Nathanael Blake
Public Discourse
Read More
Elon Musk Can’t Fix Twitter’s Problem
Nathanael Blake
The Federalist
Read More
The ‘Forced Birth’ Falsehood
Alexandra DeSanctis
National Review Online
Read More
The Russian Path Not Taken
George Weigel
Syndicated Column
Read More
Primaries Portend a MAGA Year Ahead
Henry Olsen
Washington Post
Read More
Return Abortion Policy to the States
O. Carter Snead
Washington Post
Read More

EPPC Scholars Advocate Against Gender Ideology, Government “Misinformation”

 
This week, EPPC’s Mary Rice Hasson and Rachel N. Morrison met with federal government officials to discuss concerns over a proposal by the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (VA) to remove the current exclusion for “gender alterations” from its medical benefits package. EPPC scholars objected to the VA’s characterization that such care is “medically necessary” and that it is “consistent with medical industry standards.” Read More

Also this week, EPPC’s David Gortler and Rachel N. Morrison submitted comment in response to a request for information by the Department of Health and Human Services on the impact and prevalence of “health misinformation” during the COVID-19 pandemic. The EPPC scholars’ comment details numerous ways that federal government agencies and officials—including the Centers for Disease Control, Food and Drug Administration, the White House, and Dr. Anthony Fauci—were purveyors of COVID-19 misinformation, leading to distrust in the government and health care systems and providers, and curtailing the ability of medical professionals to provide quality and lifesaving care to their patients. Read More
APPEARANCES

Mary FioRito appeared on Chicago’s Morning Answer with host Dan Proft to discuss the leaked Dobbs opinion, its implications for the forthcoming decision and the midterm elections this November, and what overturning Roe would mean for abortion laws throughout the country.

Click here to listen to the segment.

EPPC Fellow Patrick T. Brown appeared on Marketplace with host Stephanie Hughes to promote pro-family economic policy in light of a potential overturning of Roe v. Wade.

Click here to listen to the segment or to read a transcript.

EPPC Visiting Fellow Alexandra DeSanctis took part in a National Catholic Register roundtable on the implications of the Supreme Court’s leaked draft that would strike down Roe v. Wade.

Click here to read this conversation.

UPCOMING EVENT
TODAY at 2 pm eastern, EPPC President Ryan T. Anderson will join Kathleen Wilson and Carrie Severino for a special virtual event on the Dobbs leak moderated by NRI senior fellow Kathryn Jean Lopez. The panelists will discuss the implications for the Court and for its decision and suggest more pro-life people should be doing to prepare for the final decision this summer.
Register Here
Twitter
Website
Copyright © 2022 Ethics and Public Policy Center, All rights reserved.


Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.