In the Literature
Genetic Testing for Suicide Risk Assessment: Theoretical Premises, Research Challenges, and Ethical Concerns
Brian L. Mishara and David N. Weisstub
If, in the future, genetic testing is able to accurately identify suicide risk in individuals, its use would nonetheless be contraindicated if we could not provide effective preventive interventions and mitigate the negative impacts of informing people about their risk level.
Patient and Relative Experiences and Decision-Making About Genetic Testing and Counseling for Familial ALS and FTD: A Systematic Scoping Review
Ashley Crook et al.
This review maps patients' and relatives' experiences of genetic testing as well as counseling for familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). It also identifies factors influencing their decision to proceed with testing or counseling.
Toward Personalized Medicine in Schizophrenia: Genetics and Epigenetics of Antipsychotic Treatment
Amanda J Lisoway et al.
Lisoway et al. review progress in understanding both genetic and epigenetic factors involved in antipsychotic response over the past five years.
Polygenic Risk Score Analysis for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Leveraging Cognitive Performance, Educational Attainment, and Schizophrenia
Restuadi Restuadi et al.
The combination of polygenic risk scores for ALS, schizophrenia (SCZ), cognitive performance (CP), and educational attainment (EA) suggest a genetic correlation between ALS, SCZ, CP, and EA, providing a better understanding of the complexity of ALS.
Do Non-Invasive Prenatal Tests Promote Discrimination Against People with Down Syndrome? What Should Be Done?
Klaus Zerres et al.
In a society where reproductive autonomy is seen as an achievement, access to non-invasive prenatal tests (NIPT) is likely not going to be limited. As such, comprehensive and qualified pretest counseling is vital to avoid possible stigmatization of people with Down syndrome.
|
|
|
Attitudes on Gene Editing and Genomic Screening
|
|
|
|
In the Media
Genetics and Responsibility: More Complicated Than We’d Thought
Erik Parens and Paul S. Appelbaum
At the recent virtual symposium, “Do genetic findings have an impact on perceptions of responsibility?” sponsored by the Center for Research on Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of Psychiatric, Neurologic & Behavioral Genetics at Columbia, in collaboration with The Hastings Center, Parens, Applebaum, and colleagues found a far more complex answer to that question than was imagined in early iterations of the geneticization thesis. Watch the recordings of the symposium here.
Roots of Major Depression Revealed in All Their Genetic Complexity
Bill Hathaway
A genome-wide association study (GWAS) of genetic and health records of 1.2 million people from four separate data banks has identified 178 gene variants linked to major depression.
|
|
|
More in the Literature
Research and Training in Autism Spectrum Disorder to Catalyze the Next Genomic and Neuroscience Revolutions
Sergiu P. Paşca et al.
Drs. Daniel Geschwind, Sarah Spence, and Pat Levitt initiated a biannual course that serves as an opportunity for scientists to learn about the clinical aspects of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), a forum for participants to share and receive feedback on their own research, and an international network of like-minded researchers to support research progress.
|
|
|
|
|
|