Copy
View this email in your browser
Dear <<First Name>>,
 
Tuesday, June 29, 2021
This week we have a special collection of pieces written by some of our summer interns. Articles include:
  • Why did COVID-19 Disproportionately Hurt Communities of Color?
  • Price Month ends; Allyship Doesn't
  • Cruella Hits the Big Screens
  • Meeting Jane Kleeb
  • Dr. Sharonica Hardin-Bartley: Humanize, Personalize, Problematize
  • Switching Places
  • The Political Side of In the Heights
  • Meeting Tracey McCreery
  • The Commoditization of Pride Month
  • Challenging the Powerful, in an Ongoing Battle to De-stigmatize Mental Health
Why did COVID-19 Disproportionately Hurt Communities of Color

By: Alice Kovarik
Over the past year, America has had to both grapple with a global pandemic and come to terms with not only the racism woven into our country’s history but also the racism that still exists today. What many people don’t realize, however, is how connected these two are. COVID-19 shook the US, but as the rest of us scrambled to stay safe and protect ourselves, doctors began noticing a trend: minorities, especially Black people, disproportionately tested positive for COVID and accounted for an inordinate number of COVID deaths. For example, in Chicago, African Americans make up about a third of the city’s population but account for half of the positive COVID tests and three quarters of COVID deaths. Sherita Hill Golden, the chief diversity officer at Johns Hopkins, said, “While much of the focus has been on African Americans disproportionately contracting and dying from COVID-19, other minority populations are also adversely affected, including Latinx/Hispanic and Native American communities.” 

The reasons for this trend can be attributed to several factors that come as a result of the common economic and social circumstances of minorities. It’s important to note, however, that these factors are shaped by racist policies enacted by local, state and federal governments, and are not the result of inadequacy or lack of hard work from within communities of color. These circumstances include crowded living conditions, working in essential fields, inconsistent access to healthcare, and more. After all, when one is either working at the front lines during a pandemic (a grocery store worker, factory worker, Uber/taxi driver, etc.), living with more individuals who could possibly contract COVID, lacking access to adequate healthcare to treat prior conditions that could put one at risk, or, in some cases, all of the above, one is increasingly likely to both contract and die from COVID-19.  What is particularly interesting about this connection, however, is the proof it provides to the claim that racism encroaches on every aspect of American life. For example, one wouldn’t think that a fair housing policy would help save lives in a pandemic, but it does just that, in addition to others. 

While we are coming out of the pandemic with more and more vaccinations, we must learn from it. Racism is often subtle, seemingly harmless legislation, but can have profound effects on millions of people. As scholar Ibram X. Kendi says, “Every policy in every institution in every community in every nation is producing or sustaining either racial inequity or equity between racial groups.” We must do our part to support legislation that actively sustains equity between racial groups, after all, we have no idea how big of an impact one piece of legislation can have.
Pride Month Ends; Allyship Doesn’t
By: Cove Stolze
A few summers ago, I spent a lot of time in queer spaces as a Pride intern. I can remember my first weeks at the internship and even my first event at which someone came up and asked me, “what are your pronouns?” At the time, I had no clue I was gay much less non-binary. “Uhhhh she/her,” I responded in a panic. I had been struggling with my sexuality and gender and knew I wasn’t a woman, but I was still questioning what I was instead. It’s hard to explain what exactly made me so uncomfortable about the question. Everyone was doing everything “right” by asking and it was better than being misgendered, I guess? But because I was grappling with so much dysphoria, having to affirm pronouns and a gender I hated to all the new queer people I was meeting sucked. I wouldn’t come out as a non-binary lesbian for nearly three more years. As a closeted queer person, questions about the gender I presented created so much dysphoria. All I wanted was for people to infer that I was a woman who used she/her and not press any further. I’ve thought about my experiences a lot, and I now advocate for minimization of the pronouns question-- especially by cis/straight people. This is a short article, so I don’t have space to lay out my reasoning in detail, but I do have space to give some tips on how to minimize pronoun discomfort for the queers in your life. Tip Number One: Provide your pronouns when you meet someone; if they don’t offer theirs, don’t push them to answer. Try to infer their pronouns through their social media, how they refer to themself, and how other people refer to them. If you can’t infer, ask someone who knows them. As a last resort, you can ask them directly. Tip Number Two: Don’t get butthurt if a queer person seems to be “withholding” their pronouns. If you’re straight/cis you have no place being offended if a queer person doesn’t offer their pronouns. It’s highly possible that you are untrustworthy in some way. If queer people don’t trust you, it’s likely that you are harming them in some way. Tip Number Three: If you mess up someone’s pronouns, just correct yourself the next time. The best apology is to get their pronouns right from then on. As a note, I would add that you can still speak to and about someone without using pronouns. Use their name or details about them (like what they’re wearing) in place of their pronouns. Lastly, gendering someone correctly can make their day, but gendering them incorrectly can ruin it. Think of the power you hold before you place the onus on queer people to do all the pronoun work for you. If queer people have to feel discomfort around pronouns, so do you (wink!)!
Cruella Hits the Big Screens
By: Emily Scott
The most recent edition to Disney’s slew of live-action remakes, Cruella, was the first Disney film to release in theaters since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. The villain origin story managed to rake in $132 million worldwide, but compared to the $200 million cost of production, it did not do well. However, this seems to be a result of the pandemic rather than a strike against the movie itself. On IMDb, Cruella holds a 7.4/10 while on Rotten Tomatoes it currently has a 74% critic review and a 97% audience review, both of which are fairly high.

Contrary to popular belief, the most important thing to note before going into Cruella is Emma Stone’s Cruella is not the same character we grew up with in Disney’s 101 Dalmations. Cruella paints the iconic villain as more of a protagonist and even provides a new antagonist, Emma Thompson’s The Baroness. Without giving too much away, the film even gives a valid reason why Cruella would dislike dalmations, but she is not the same puppy murderer of our childhoods. 

The best parts of the movie are the trifecta of music, visuals, and fashion. Set in the 1970s, Cruella is filled with perfectly fitting 70s music that adds to the fun and chaotic tone of the film as news headlines layer over the b-roll. The main plot line of the movie follows Cruella (or Estella as she is called throughout most of the film) as she tries to make a break into the fashion industry as designing is her dream. Then, of course, the film features larger-than life outfit designs that Emma Stone more than pulls off. Those three elements combined make Cruella a surprisingly fun movie experience. It doesn’t hurt that the dynamics between the characters create hilarious scenarios. Oh, and we can’t forget the occasional heist that occurs!

The main, and really only, complaint is the portrayal of mental health. The movie implies that Estella and Cruella are two separate entities and thus means that the movie is suggesting that Estella/Cruella has the mental disorder Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID). DID can affect up to 15% of people and describes when there are multiple identities that front in one individual. This is an extreme oversimplification of the disorder, but due to word limitations and knowledge restraints I do not feel as if I can properly explain the nuances or the experience that people with DID have. Although, one does not need to be a mental health expert to know that Cruella does not portray this disorder correctly and in fact perpetuates harmful stereotypes. This is a concept I delve deeper into over on the Civitas Student Blog.

If you keep in mind that DID is not accurately portrayed in Cruella, the movie is overall a fun experience.

Meeting Jane Kleeb

By: Grace Bradley

On June 24th, Jane Kleeb, Chair of the Nebraska Democratic Party, zoomed in as a guest speaker with the Civitas summer interns. In addition to her position as Chair of the Nebraska Democratic Party, Jane Kleeb is the founder and president of Bold Alliance, serves as a board member of Our Revolution, and formerly held the position of Executive Director of Young Democrats of America. Her career not only consists of work with large organizations and nonprofits, but also includes working directly with the people she serves. One of her most notable accomplishments has been organizing to end the Keystone XL Pipeline that would impact the Native Americans and farmers near the pipeline.
 

During the Zoom call, Civitas interns took turns asking Kleeb different questions about her career, life, activism, issues she’s passionate about, and more. Kleeb gave insight on the life of a rural Democrat and community organizing. Ways that Kleeb believes that rural communities can turn to progressive candidates is through building trust with the people, telling the truth, and remaining consistent. Kleeb has also authored a book,“Harvest the Vote”, that provides information on how to push for change in rural America.

Although there are issues--climate change, racial equality, and women’s health care--that Kleeb believes there is no room to compromise on, she also believes that compromise in certain areas is crucial to making the changes that serve American people. Kleeb said that finding common ground is easier than we think and that we don’t need to agree on everything to make progress: “Sometimes we need to work with the other side, but we can’t give up our values. We gain the trust of voters by telling the truth and being authentic. We don’t need to agree on everything to get things done. We don’t need to agree on abortion to get clean water into our communities.”

Dr. Sharonica L. Hardin-Bartley: Humanize, Personalize, Problematize

By: Maggie Hannick

Serving as superintendent of the University City School District for five years now, Dr. Sharonica L. Hardin-Bartley has worked hard to bring change to education, advocating for equity, managing trauma, and uplifting voices, especially of students. She overseas almost 3000 students and over 400 faculty and staff and ensures all needs are met. Dr. Hardin-Bartley grew up in St. Louis, attending higher education here as well and getting degrees in education. Her experience with this city has allowed her to sit on the boards of Big Brothers Big Sisters of Eastern Missouri, the University City Children’s Center, the Magic House, and the United Way of Greater St. Louis. Additionally, Dr. Hardin-Bartley served on the Ferguson Commission to help promote well-being and equity for children. She also has worked to implement restorative justice in her work, reducing suspensions in schools. Dr. Hardin-Bartley is wise, bold, innovative, and unafraid.

As a community leader, Dr. Hardin-Bartley detects problems, listens to concerns, and solves issues. She understands the forces that cause division, inequity, and injustice, especially the poverty level and wealth gap in St. Louis. She seeks to be aware of all sides, value humans first, acknowledge different experiences, and find common ground in inclusivity, truth, and respect. She identifies herself as a status quo disruptor, which is significant for a superintendent to change what is needed and push for reforms despite pushback and limitations.

After 2020, with the intensity of the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 presidential election, Dr. Hardin-Bartley had to navigate many high-stress situations. However, she continued to impact her community positively, including learning about the virus to keep people sharing, starting a meal distribution program along with other supplies, advocating for mental health, and making hard but necessary decisions to educate virtually. She also supports critical race theory and the teaching of it because “America wouldn’t have been founded in 1776 without what happened in 1619.” There is a lot of misinformation, fear, and controversy that clouds education, but Dr. Hardin-Bartley pushes for awareness and truth against hatred and ignorance. She sees how school systems are still segregated because of how separated Black and white communities still are because of the racism in housing, education, workplaces, and more. Dr. Hardin-Bartley leads with the plan “humanize, personalize and problematize,” which helps her, her colleagues, and students thrive in education. She also continually asks herself, “Are the children well?” This question guides Dr. Hardin-Bartley in her work because her goal and commitment is to care for the children she serves and do everything in her power to provide for them a valuable education. She has even reimagined learning to allow for a better way to teach a new generation during this time.

Dr. Hardin-Bartley is a change-maker, ready to take on challenges and improve her school district. University City is fortunate to have her as superintendent because of the short-term and long-term changes she is implementing to benefit all people part of the University City community.

 

Switching Places

By: Martriana Muhammad

At the time of writing this, a couple of days ago I learned of a mother in El Paso, TX who posed as her daughter at the middle school she attended. The story initially caught me pretty off guard to say the least, because before listening further, I couldn’t imagine why a random mother would want to impersonate a middle schooler, and I originally thought that it was some sort of stunt for views or internet points. However, after I listened further, I found myself seeing the point of the mother on why she did this. 
 
On June 1st, a mother by the name of Casey Garcia posed as her 13-year-old daughter and attended her school for the day. She was able to attend all her classes, work on assignments, and even eat in the school cafeteria with the other students. She was only caught when the seventh period teacher asked her to stay after class and noticed that she wasn’t her daughter. Garcia then revealed her true identity and told the teacher about the experiment. On June 5th she was charged with criminal trespass and tampering with government records and booked on both charges(along with an unrelated traffic charge) and was later released on a bond of $7,908.
 
 She said that she didn’t do this for clout, views, likes, nor as some stunt to promote a social media platform like an unrelated, similar incident just two weeks prior, as a 28-year-old did in order to promote her Instagram page. Although, you could argue that the attention she DID get contributes to the awareness of the problem she was trying to bring to light. She did this as a social experiment to prove a very important point. The point being: “We need better security at our schools,” as stated in her second YouTube video discussing the event. 
 
For me, this isn’t a discussion of whether or not the method she used for this experiment was right or wrong, or if this truly her intention. Nor is it if puting more security and/or metal detectors would make the school feel like a high-security prison. We could always have those discussions later. The discussion is that the security in our schools is currently not up to an adequate standard, whether it be elementary, public, college or otherwise. Even if you do take a major issue with what she has done, wouldn’t you also agree to increased security to prevent stunts like this from happening again? If the mother of a current student who just-so-happens to be of a similar height of the average middle schooler could easily not even sneak into a middle school for an entire day, what would stop someone of a more malicious intent from doing the same? Garcia states in her video, “Are you more concerned that I, a parent, was sitting next to your child or do we really wanna wait for the next person taking their second amendment right to the extreme?”

The Political Side of In the Heights

By: Sarah Herzog

The ground-breaking, upbeat, heartfelt, sensational musical, In The Heights, was recently adapted into a blockbuster film, becoming the word around town this summer. Written by Lin-Manuel Miranda, the film follows Usnavi, a bodega owner whose family immigrated from the Dominican Republic when he was a child. Other characters include Benny, Nina, Abuela Claudia, Vanessa, and Sonny. I thoroughly enjoyed every minute of In The Heights; my body filled with excitement and joy, my limbs itching to get up and dance with everyone else in the movie theater to celebrate culture and family. Its colors were exuberant and the costumes were designed with precision so that each character could be defined solely by them. As appropriate to a musical, the dancing and music were phenomenal; each voice lifting me up and ringing clearly through the whole theater, carrying me through the blocks of Washington Heights (where it was appropriately filmed) and taking me along with every character. Before I knew it I was strolling down the street with Nina or dancing with Usnavi. The choreography reached a high level of professionalism and each body moved in synchronization with one another, painting a beautiful picture of Washington Heights that gives glimpses into the culture. My favorite number, in terms of its choreography, is 96,000, a song that captures the character’s ambitions in life as they marvel over whether they would win the $96,000  lottery ticket that Usnavi’s bodega sold. The number features glorious synchronous swimming in the community pool of Washington Heights. 

As much as I loved the bright colors, beautiful choreography, wonderful music, and themes of family, love, dreams, and community; in my opinion, the most relevant aspect of In The Heights, and what sets it apart, is the politics of it, and how it directly reflects the stories of so many people in the Latinx community. Usnavi, Nina, Vanessa, Benny, Abuela Claudia, Sonny, and Daniela, each has a little dream, or el sueñito, that is universally shared among minorities.  They represent stories that haven’t been widely told enough. It enables people who have wanted to be seen to finally be seen. As well as representation of the Lantinx community and their stories, Lin-Manuel Miranda’s creation also deals with social justice issues such as gentrification, immigration, and racism, which are all prevalent issues that are facing the U.S. today. In college, Nina experiences racism, such as being searched and being mistaken for a waitress at Stanford University. Vanessa gets rejected from a job opportunity because of her race and socioeconomic status. Usnavi’s cousin, Sonny, fights to go to college, but the odds are against him because of his status as an undocumented immigrant. 

In The Heights is just a step in the right direction in terms of representation for the Latinx community and for all minorities. There is hope for Broadway and Hollywood to continue telling stories that show facets of everyone’s lives.

Meeting Tracey McCreery

By: Thalia Vincent

From the 2nd amendment Preservation Act to education reform, Rep. Tracy McCreery can talk about it all. Recently summer interns had the honor of speaking with Democratic representative Tracy McCreery of the 88th MO House District- also known as the Olivette, Creve Coeur, and Ladue area. Rep. McCreery was first elected as an independent into office in 2011 through a special election, replacing Rep. Jake Zimmerman who was elected to the St. Louis County assessor position. After trying to run again, Tracy unfortunately suffered defeat in the Democratic primary. She described it as being embarrassing because, “Usually when you don’t get a job nobody knows, but everyone knows if you lose as a politician because it goes in the newspaper.” She did not take this loss as a defeat, though, and spent the next years working with different organizations such as PROMO, a statewide LGBTQ organization. She eventually jumped back onto the campaign trail and successfully was elected in November of 2014.  

 

When first speaking with us, Rep. McCreery told us about one of her many jobs: report writing. Essentially, she writes reports on bills in layman’s terms. When doing this she usually throws in some pop culture reference to both keep people's attention and ensure that people read the report. Besides this she is a ranking member of many committees like Utilities, Agriculture Policy, Emerging Issues, and Legislative Review. 

 

One new bill Rep. McCreery spoke about was the 2nd Amendment Preservation Act- a recently signed law that prohibits police from enforcing any federal rules that violate the Second Amendment. As described by her, this bill will basically make it Missouri police officers vs. Federal police officers. McCreery is positive that this bill will eventually be declared unconstitutional due to this very reason. Some may ask why she and other democrats could not overturn the bill before it became law, but to this McCreery would probably say it is because they are in the super minority. This means that the number of Democratic members is so low that the other party can have automatic veto over all democrat’s bills. McCreery has not let this discourage her, though, and came up with some creative ways to work around it. One being having someone else do your work. This may sound unideal for other jobs, but something that works in her favor as a member of the super minority. She essentially hops in on other member’s bills and tries to throw in suggestions that she believes will benefit the greater good. This has helped her get many items passed such as an initiative that will provide women in prison with menstrual hygiene products.    

 

Rep. McCreery also spoke on a several other topics ranging from trying to get MONA passed and compromising with republicans. One element that is clear when hearing Rep. McCreery speak is that she is passionate about what she does. You can catch her in the upcoming 2022 Missouri State Senate election, which she recently announced her campaign for.

 

The Commoditization of Pride Month

By: Tishitha Avvaru
Pride month is celebrated in the United States to commemorate the Stonewall riots as well as the many other efforts for LGBTQ+ rights in this country. It uplifts members of the LGBTQ+ community and serves as a month of celebration for the various identities that make up the community. And in recent years, more and more companies have taken part in Pride month. Scroll through Twitter during June and you will inevitably run into multitudes of companies with pride-themed profile pictures promoting their new pride-themed merchandise. Brands have begun abandoning traditional outlooks and instead embracing the LGBTQ+ community, an act that is empowering but often overwhelmingly problematic.
Rainbow capitalism is often used to denote the commoditization of LGBTQ+ imagery of brands during Pride month. Companies tend to profit off of pride-themed material, but never actually do anything that benefits the community. Some of the same companies that added a rainbow to their Twitter profile pictures and claim to promote diversity actively donate to anti-LGBTQ+ politicians and organizations. For example, AT&T changed their Twitter banner and profile picture to be more inclusive, yet they, and over 130 other businesses, made over 327 donations totaling $204,350 to anti-LGBTQ+ legislators. These companies putting on a superficial front to pretend to care about LGBTQ+ issues serve to actively harm the community as it aids in erasing what pride is truly about in mainstream culture.

There is no way to fully avoid or fix rainbow capitalism, but a small start would be to hold companies accountable and attempt to right the wrongs of corporate giants. If possible, call companies out for their performative action and push them to donate to LGBTQ+ charities. Consumers have a voice, but it often goes unused.

*If you want to donate to any LGBTQ+ charities, a few are linked below.
https://give.thetrevorproject.org/give/330001/#!/donation/checkout?c_src=pride2021&c_src2=headerDonate (The Trevor Project)
https://4agc.com/donation_pages/b7a2763a-7c0e-4bba-90ca-b396a24e4ecd  (The Stonewall Foundation)
https://www.twocc.us/donate/ (Trans Women of Color Collective)
https://www.aclu.org/ (American Civil Liberties Union)
https://www.hrc.org/ (Human Rights Campaign)

 

Challenging the Powerful, in an Ongoing Battle to De-stigmatize Mental Health

By: Vera Rosenblum
This past March, the former duke and duchess of Sussex, came on national television to discuss their experiences with marginalization at the hands of the royal family. The former duchess revealed her personal struggles with mental health and the lack of help and consideration she received from the British Monarchy. One woman, standing up to a large and powerful institution, challenging the status quo and breaking the taboo of mental health struggles.
 
Across the ocean, in a regrettably similar position, Naomi Osaka was forced to choose between her career and status; and her mental well being. In the weeks leading up to the French Open, the second ranked tennis player globally, Naomi Osaka, withdrew from the tournament following a conflict with the organization over press conferences. Naomi cited her lifelong struggle with depression and anxiety as to why she did not feel comfortable attending the post-match interviews. In response to this decision, she was fined 15,000 dollars by the French Open and “ promised stiffer penalties to come”, (Washington Post). Given the harsh reaction to her advocating for her mental health from an institution that has long minimized the voice of athletes, Naomi took to twitter to explain her rationale for withdrawing from the tournament, “I would never trivialize or take mental health lightly”.
 
Not only does this advocacy encourage other athletes to stand up for themselves, it creates a general push towards destigmatizing mental health struggles. Well-being should be an active conversation in all spheres of life, and especially when it comes to the voices of women and people of color. It takes valiant and righteous individuals, such as Meghan Markle and Naomi Osaka, to introduce these topics and challenge the institutions who try to silence them.

 
Twitter
Facebook
Instagram
YouTube
Website
Email
Copyright © 2021 Civitas Associates, All rights reserved.


Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp