Copy

Israel-Palestine News Update: 24th July 2021

The main story this week: 
Israeli Government reviews agreement to relocate Khan al-Ahmar residents to Israel

What happened?

An end to the contentious issue of the Palestinian Bedouin community Khan al-Ahmar could be within reach, if Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennet resolves to accept an agreement negotiated during the Netanyahu era between the Israeli government and its residents.  

On Wednesday the High Court of Justice accepted the new Israeli government’s request for an extension for submitting its stance on the evacuation of the West Bank Bedouin herding village of Khan al-Ahmar. The government noted that the previous government headed by former prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu had informed the court in February 2020 that it was in favor of the evacuation of the village, but that since this government had only been sworn in on June 13 it needed more time to examine the necessary conditions for the outpost and carry out an in-depth inquiry of the move. The state requested a pause to the expulsions for two further months to allow for the Civil Administration to reach an agreement by which locals, who belong to the Jahalin tribe, would voluntarily relocate.  

The government proposed a deadline of September 14 to provide its opinion on a 2019 petition made by the far-right settler supporting Regavim group, who requested that the court establish a timetable for the eviction; the government were only afforded to the 5 September following following several petitions for extensions in the past. 

Why is it important?

Over the years, Khan al-Ahmar has become an international symbol of the Israeli-Palestinian fight for land in Part C, the area of the West Bank that the Oslo Accords assigned to Israel full civil and security control. 

The government argues that Khan al-Ahmar, which is mostly comprised of temporary structures, were constructed illegally and represent a danger to the village residents due to their proximity to a highway.  But the few dozen families – who have lived at the site since the 1950s, when it was under Jordanian control, after Israel expelled them from Negev – state that they had no choice but to construct without Israeli permits, as such permits are seldom extended to Palestinians for construction in the West Bank, where Israel enjoys total control. 

In 2018, the High Court approved the demolition and evacuation of the village despite villagers receiving support from the International Criminal Court and NGOs to remain on the land. The ICC prosecutor at the time, Fatou Bensouda, declared that expelling the locals could count as a war crime.  She insisted that, if necessary, she would not hesitate to respond.  

Responding to the situation, the Friends of Jahalin group said: “we hope that the state will be wise enough to lay out a real proposal for a decent solution for members of the Jahalin tribe”. Emphasizing, that they should be afforded the same rights as their neighboring Jewish communities. The group called upon Israel to issue construction permits and guarantee equality of rights and opportunities.  

In contrast, Regavim Director-General Meir Deutsch accused the government of adopting an “ineffectual -even helpless – posture in the face of illegal construction at Khan al-Ahmar". He added, “we are gratified that even the High Court of Justice has grown weary of the government’s failure to enforce the law, to maintain order in areas under its juridistication, and to protect Israel’s national interests”.  

What's next?

The agreement negotiated between the previous government and villagers currently on Bennett’s desk presents him with a valuable opportunity to be consistent with his previous pledges to evacuate Khan al-Ahmar, whilst avoiding the international backlash which a forced eviction would garner.  

Under the agreement, the residents will be relocated to a permanent site in the South of Israel where they will receive permanent residency status. In exchange, they are required to evacuate the village without issue. Yohanan Tzoreff, an expert in Israeli-Palestinian relations at the Tel Aviv University, has proposed that Bennett is likely to accept the compromise. As the residents in question “were Israeli residents” who settled in Tel Sheva before moving to Khan al-Ahmar. Therefore, extending residency status to this community would not establish a precedent, which would otherwise be a highly unattractive prospect for the Prime Minister.  

Both long-term and short-term considerations will influence Bennett’s decision. Irregardless of the terms, if Bennett succeeds in evacuating the residents, it will signal a victory over the former government as the settlement was finally levelled under Bennet as opposed to Netanyahu.

Though Bennett will need to emphasize to his electorate the virtues of compromise in a case that Israeli media has often portrayed as a black and white matter of land invasion and illegal settlement, the fact that negotiations began under Netanyahu should boost the legitimacy of the deal and dampen criticism. A further consideration that could persuade Bennett to accept the deal is that it would offer him a means of steering clear of a diplomatic and international public relations disaster. Finally, it is unlikely that this issue would damage the integrity of the Bennett-Lapid coalition, comprised of right-wing and left-wing parties, in addition to the Arab Ra’am party, as it not a core issue for the Arab List. 

What's the media saying?
 
Each week we provide you with reporting on our main headline from an international, Hebrew and Arab source to help you get the full story. As you read each source ask yourself... 
 
The Jerusalem Post: Court demands Bennett take stance on Khan al-Ahmar razing by Sept. 5
  • Prime Minister Naftali Bennett’s new government must render its opinion on the pending evacuation of the illegally built West Bank Bedouin herding village of Khan al-Ahmar no later than September 5, the High Court of Justice said on Wednesday. Read more
Middle East Monitor: Supreme Court urges Israel gov't to clarify position on evacuation of Khan Al-Ahmar
  • The Supreme Court of Israel has given Naftali Bennett's government a deadline until next September to clarify its position on the evacuation order issued to the Palestinian Bedouin community of Khan Al-Ahmar in occupied East Jerusalem. The text of the court's decision issued yesterday stated that the court has granted the government until 5 September to render its position regarding carrying out the order to evacuate Khan Al-Ahmar community, adding that this would not be extended again. Read more
The Media Line: Khan al-Ahmar Compromise Revealed: Resettlement in Negev, Permanent
  • Another important advantage which may push Bennett to accept the agreement is that it will enable him to avoid a diplomatic and international public relations fiasco. “It solves the issue of evacuation with all the trouble it will cause in the US today, and with different entities watching every move made here,” Tzoreff said. “This is a kind of compromise” that Bennet may accept, he says, because “reality is much more complicated” now that he has stepped into the premier’s shoes. Read more
SNS Update - Student Leadership Programme 2021

This year's Elliott Simmons Student Leadership Programme will be running from the 23rd - 27th August 2021. is a five-day programme for 20 students who want deeper learning on the Israel-Palestine conflict, receive training in conflict resolution and affect positive change within their societies or communities. We have space for 20 participants and it’s open to students aged 16-19.

The deadline is midnight, 25th July 2021.

Please forward this to anyone you think would make a good candidate!

To learn more and apply: https://solutionsnotsides.co.uk/student-leadership-programme

Recommended Reading

The Gen Z activist twins of Sheikh Jarrah, Jerusalem| The Times
Theirs began the way of modern movements of resistance: with Muna el-Kurd taking out her iPhone and live streaming the scenes right in front of her. Mohammed, her brother, followed suit. Two Palestinian 23-year-olds with their Apple Inc weapons, documenting the almost daily violence they witness from armed settlers and military police. What else could they do? | Read more
Israel-Palestine conflict looms large as Biden meets Jordan King| Al Jazeera
The Israel-Palestine conflict is expected to take up much of the discussion between United States President Joe Biden and Jordan’s King Abdullah II when the Jordanian leader visits the White House on Monday for the first time since Biden was elected. | Read more
[Opinion] Yes, Meretz does differentiate between Israel and settlements| MK Mossi Raz in Israel Hayom
Our position is that settlements are immoral, illegal, and cause incredible damage to state security. As long as the damage was to security, the economy, and democracy, it was ignored by the Right. But then came Ben & Jerry's announcement it would no longer sell ice cream in the Palestinian territories, and the ostrich removed its head from the sand. | Read More
Facebook
Twitter
Link
Website
Copyright © 2021 Solutions Not Sides, All rights reserved.


Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
Facebook
Twitter
Link
Website
Copyright © 2021 Solutions Not Sides, All rights reserved.


Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
Facebook
Twitter
Link
Website
Copyright © 2021 Solutions Not Sides, All rights reserved.


Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
Facebook
Twitter
Link
Website
Copyright © 2021 Solutions Not Sides, All rights reserved.


Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp