Copy
Sign up for subtext                                                                               View this email in your browser

Today, we look at the obstacles facing Afghans who are trying to flee the country, and consider the untold history of the Alamo in Texas.

 THE TAKE 

The frantic rush to evacuate people from Afghanistan continues this week ahead of the Biden administration’s withdrawal deadline – and things are looking more and more dire for Afghans trying to flee the Taliban’s rule.

The U.S. has prioritized evacuating its citizens and permanent residents, and while they’ve increased the speed of the process, several thousand Americans are still reportedly waiting to leave. The backlog is such that Afghans who applied for the Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) program in order to depart the country were told on Monday by U.S. officials to not even come to the airport in Kabul. It’s quite clear that, despite the increased danger, Afghans who have worked for U.S. agencies are being treated as less of a priority.

The Taliban also seems to be cutting off exit routes. On Tuesday, the armed group said it would no longer allow Afghan nationals to go to the Kabul airport for evacuation flights, and wouldn’t accept an extension to the Biden administration’s August 31 deadline to withdraw U.S. troops from Afghanistan.

This is bad news for the thousands of Afghans trying to flee, and who are now running out of options. Many people are hunkering down in their homes or safe houses, particularly those who fear a rollback of women’s rights and reprisal from the Taliban, according to the Associated Press. Some people are still waiting to hear back from other organizations that are trying to help them get evacuated. 

So while the Biden administration is ramping up its efforts, Afghans who face the direct consequences of the U.S.’s actions are stuck in an increasingly desperate situation. “We are asking ourselves ‘What is next?’” an Afghan journalist in hiding told the AP. “We are crying because nothing can be fixed.” 

Was this email forwarded to you? Click here to subscribe to subtext!
 HISTORY CLASS 

📚 ‘Forget the Alamo’ as you know it

A police officer walks outside of the closed Alamo on April 1, 2020 in downtown San Antonio, Texas. [AFP/Mark Felix]

Do you “remember the Alamo”? If so, you might want to consider forgetting it. Or, at least, the version of the story that you think you know.

The battle of the Alamo – which took place during the Texas Revolution, when the Mexican army laid siege on a mission for 13 days and hundreds of Texians (as Texas settlers were called) and Tejanos fought them to their deaths – has become a metaphor for American liberty and honor.

The story, though, is rooted in myth. Some Texas historians have tried to correct it, but conservatives have championed the tale in middle school history books, and even used it to prop up a multi-million dollar Alamo renovation project. GOP leaders detest the so-called “revisionist” narrative so much that they’ve gone so far as to get a virtual event for a new book on the topic canceled

That new book, appropriately called Forget the Alamo, lays bare the uncomfortable facts at the heart of the story. I recently spoke to journalist and communications consultant Jason Stanford, who co-authored the book along with Bryan Burrough and Chris Tomlinson, about the importance of dispelling these myths. (This interview has been edited for length and clarity.)

Why did you and your co-authors write this book?

There are wide misconceptions about what is essentially the creation myth of Texas. It's a myth on par with the Civil War being about states' rights or George Washington chopping down the cherry tree. It's just not true … and that has had pretty, pretty dark consequences for generations.

What’s commonly taught in Texas about the Alamo?

That a bunch of freedom-loving settlers in Texas defeated the dastardly dictator Santa Anna to win liberty for the Republic of Texas, knowing that they were going to die. It was a story of self-sacrifice in the service of liberty for their fellow man. 

But largely, the freedom that [the settlers] were fighting for was the freedom to enslave people. And Santa Anna, far from just being a dictator for being a dictator’s sake, was a pragmatic politician. And Mexico was an abolitionist country that had unfortunately made an accommodation with the Anglo settlers on slavery, because they needed people to live in Texas to protect them from Comanche raids.

Texas wanted to think of itself as “different” than the rest of the South after the Civil War. So they told this story of liberty and not slavery. The University of Texas taught … history professors for generations [who] taught the myth as the real history of Texas until after World War II. 

Now, when historians, both Hispanic and Anglo, start talking about how “that's not really the way it happened,” it’s attacked and suppressed and ignored. 

Why does the myth persist?

Well, part of it is politics – that the people in charge like the story, the heroic Anglo myth. And so anything that contradicts that story, regardless of its historical accuracy, is considered disloyal to Texas, an insult to who we are as Texans. That's actually how a lot of Anglo Texans feel about this stuff. 

On the other side, the Hispanic historians and academics are more interested in what has been left out. Not just the Tejano defenders at the Alamo who were killed and who were part of the revolution, and then subsequently run out of Texas in a kind of ethnic cleansing, but the fact that this was Mexico, and that Hispanics were instantly turned into second-class citizens in their own country, and many of them had no interest in starting their own country, and that their stories have not been taught part of the history of Texas for a long time. 

So a lot of them said, “Yeah, no, we haven't been studying the Alamo because it's not our history.” So the Alamo became white people’s history. And it's this academic and intellectual segregation that kept it out of mainstream culture and understanding for a long time. We’re not writing anything new. We're just writing it for a new audience. 

What’s behind people’s unwillingness to acknowledge slavery’s role in the Texas Revolution?

This is about identity. One of the [laws passed against] critical race theory [states] that schools are not allowed to teach issues in a way that makes anyone feel bad about their race. And what they mean without saying so explicitly there is you can't make white people feel guilty by teaching them about slavery, or about Jim Crow, even though that's been happening to Black and brown people for a hundred years. 

It’s like what my wife said after the 2020 elections: White people don't want to be told that they're wrong. They don't want to be made to feel bad. And this is largely about a white power structure feeling personally invested in a positive version of history. And that they think by learning more about history that they're being told not just that Jim Bowie was bad, but that they are bad. 

Is there anything else you want people to know about the overlooked history of the Alamo?

Going into it, we thought we were writing a book about how there was never a line in the sand, and people were fighting for slavery. What we discovered was how punishing this myth has been for Texas Hispanics for generations. 

They were pointed to by teachers and told that people that looked like them killed Davy Crockett. The way Texas teaches its history makes bad guys [out] of what is soon to be its dominant population. We heard many anecdotes of field trips, where little seventh graders would walk in [to the Alamo] as Texans, and walk out as Texans and Mexicans. 

And it never occurs to the white people in Texas that that's what's happening, but every Hispanic I know knows it. And I'm just glad that this book found a popular audience so that white Texans go, “Huh, didn't know that.” And now they're having conversations with their Hispanic friends that they never had before. That’s how I think change happens – we tell a story that includes everyone.

— Samantha Grasso (@samjgrasso)

 WHAT WE'RE READING 

Colectivo Coffee workers just voted to become the largest unionized coffee chain in the country. [NBC15]

Watching the climate apocalypse play out on social media is surreal. [Gizmodo]

Here are the health care prices that hospitals and insurers really don’t want you to see. [New York Times]

A look at the legacy of Marsha P. Johnson on her 76th birthday. [Out]

We should be talking about the fact that 5 million people in Yemen are facing famine. [Al Jazeera]

 POSTSCRIPT 

An explainer on the latest viral trend to sweep social media. [COMPLEX]

Today’s newsletter is brought to you by Samantha Grasso, Sarah Leonard, Isra Rahman and Alexia Underwood. Send us your tips, questions and comments to subtext@ajplus.net.

Received this email from a friend?

Subscribe now
Copyright © 2021 AJ+, All rights reserved.


Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.