Copy
View this email in your browser


 
Notes from Sarah Campbell | November 4, 2021
Non-toxic tactics for finishing a project you care about. 
 

People with more time to finish, often don’t


A modest proposal to work like it’s the last minute—
before the last minute

 
I’ve lived in Seattle for 7 years and have never been to the top of the Space Needle. I lived in Seattle in the mid-90s and never went to the top of the Space Needle then, either. My friend’s family just visited from the Dominican Republic for a couple weeks, and guess what they did? Space Needle. All the way up.
 
It’s not that I don’t want to hit this landmark. It’s that I figure I’ll eventually get to it, that I have time. And yet, I’ve already had years and still haven’t made it happen. I’m one of those locals now who asks tourists to tell me about my city’s icons—and I’m not proud of that.
 
You know what I need? A deadline.
 
I’ve been reading about the “deadline effect” in Christopher Cox’s book by the same name, and it’s driven home for me the insight that for all my interest in time (organizing it, being in tune with our best times, finding a reality-based relation to it), there’s more to finishing than just having more time.
The “deadline effect,” Cox explains, explains why tourists see the landmarks that locals never get to. It’s something we’ve all experienced: that last-minute urgency we feel to spring into action when we know we’re running out of time. It’s the built-in delay and 11th-hour scrambling that accompany strike negotiations and college term papers. It’s the fire that lights up beneath us when our lukewarm, procrastinating hearts finally believe we have to deliver or we’ll miss our chance.
 
I know we know this already about deadlines: they’re motivating.
 
But here’s what else Cox wants us to grasp about deadlines: they prove, in a variety of scenarios, that having more time to meet them isn’t necessarily to our advantage.  Cox makes a compelling case for this in his book where he gathers examples of how shorter timeframes for completing a task were more motivating to people.
 
There’s the Census experiment in which an A/B test showed that people with less time (7 days less) to return a survey, were more likely to return it. In another study that gave people a coupon for a free slice of cake, the people with less time to claim their treat (3 weeks) were more likely to actually do so than those who had more time (2 months) to do so. 31% of the first group got their cake (and presumably ate it too) as compared to 6% of the second group. (Cox, The Deadline Effect).
 
What is especially intriguing to me about this last example (and the tourist phenomenon—both presented in the work of Suzanne Shu and Ayelet Gneezy) is that the deadline effect shows up even with pleasant actions like claiming free cake. Shu and Gneezy title their work the “Procrastination of Enjoyable Experiences.”
 
Human behavior is a little bit confusing, isn’t it?
 
I’m not going to try delve into the psychology of why we put off doing nice things (but seriously, why??)
 
What I will do with this phenomenon is ask those of us setting our own project timelines: do we really need all the time we give ourselves? What would happen if we gave ourselves less time for certain segments of our project work? I’m guessing we’d still delay. But there’s also the chance that by reducing the gaping expanse between us and a delivery date, that we’d be less likely to miss the deadline entirely.
“Set yourself a deadline, the earlier the better.”
 
– Christopher  Cox, The Deadline Effect
That is Cox’s message. Summing up his book in single line, he says it’s this: “Set a deadline, the earlier the better.”
 
Will you catch me ascending the Space Needle this weekend? Probably not. But …. I am going to feel better the next time I have less time to turn something around. Because, when I look back on my past and all those deadlines that have come and gone in my work, it was the ones with distant due dates that caused me the most mental grief. The shorter, surprise deadlines (when they weren’t too ridiculously impossible)—those were dispatched with less anguish, and, I’d argue, similar quality.
 
I’ll leave you solo project-planneurs, then, with a challenge this week: give one of your deadlines a withering look and, if it’s not too ridiculously impossible (technical term), move it up.
 
Thanks for reading!
Free-associations, feedback, advice for finishing, or links to interesting reads are appreciated.

Forward this to someone who might enjoy it.
They can subscribe to this newsletter here.
Find more Finish It on Instagram.
Instagram
Copyright © Sarah Campbell. All rights reserved.
 






This email was sent to <<Email Address>>
why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences
Finish It · 539 N 82nd St · Seattle, WA 98103-4305 · USA

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp