Copy

Climate x FinReg Roundup:
February 4th

This weekly news roundup highlights noteworthy developments at the intersection of climate change and financial regulation.

Supply Chains

Over the past year, U.S. consumer prices have risen by about 7%. Although some experts attribute the rise to President Biden’s COVID-19 relief package, there may be an additional culprit: climate change-induced threats to the supply chain, which are causing “greenflation.”

  • “For years, scientists and economists have warned that climate change could cause massive shortages of major commodities. . . That phenomenon, long hypothesized, may be starting to actually arrive. Over the past year, unprecedented weather disasters have caused the price of key commodities to spike.”

  • For example, when the U.S. experienced its hottest summer on record last year, “searing heat—combined with record-setting drought—gave rise to swarms of grasshoppers that devoured the wheat crop. Those conditions helped push wheat prices to their highest level in years.”

  • Similar conditions have plagued the lumber industry, where productive capacity has declined as a result of wildfires and floods, and prices have reached new highs.

  • It is doubtful that the Federal Reserve can fix greenflation through rising interest rates. One lumber trader remarked that “raising interest rates will blunt demand for housing—no doubt. But if you blunt demand enough to bring lumber prices down, you’re destroying the economy. Raising rates doesn’t grow more trees.”

Federal Reserve

Sarah Bloom Raskin’s nomination to be Vice Chair of Supervision for the Fed faces significant pushback from Republican senators, who seem likely to be unified in opposing her confirmation.

  • “Several Republican lawmakers referred to an opinion piece critical of government support for fossil fuel companies that Ms. Raskin wrote for the New York Times in 2020.” However, at her confirmation hearing, Raskin “rebutt[ed] the idea that she would favor using bank supervision to choke off lending to oil and gas companies.”

  • In response to questions from senators, Raskin repeatedly said “it is inappropriate for the Fed to make credit decisions and allocations based on choosing winners and losers—banks choose their borrowers, the Fed does not.”

  • Raskin’s confirmation also faces a different roadblock: If she receives no support from Republicans, then New Mexico Senator Ben Ray Luján—who is currently absent from the chamber while recovering from a stroke—may need to provide the 50th vote. Her confirmation may be delayed as they wait for Senator Luján to make a full recovery.

Department of the Treasury

On Wednesday, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said that adjusting banks’ capital requirements based on their exposure to climate risk would be “premature.” Secretary Yellen emphasized the necessity for “regulators [to] do the groundwork that’s necessary for them to evaluate risks to individual firms.”

  • The Financial Stability Oversight Council, which Yellen chairs, “has shown no readiness to recommend that climate risks be incorporated into stress tests, which annually evaluate individual banks and help set capital requirements. FSOC has, however, begun studying the threat of climate change to financial institutions and markets.”

Other Items of Interest

  • Fannie Mae has urged FEMA to require that prospective homebuyers be informed of the flood risk of a property that they intend to purchase. However, two influential real estate groups—the National Association of Realtors and the National Association of Home Builders—have voiced opposition to the prospective disclosure mandate.

  • MSCI, the world’s largest provider of ESG ratings, faces criticism for providing ratings upgrades to several of the world’s largest banks, including Wells Fargo, Citigroup, and Morgan Stanley, despite the fact that said banks continue to lend tens of billions to fossil fuel companies.

  • A director at S&P Global Ratings has warned that climate-related litigation risks are on the rise. Specifically, improvements in climate change attribution science are helping plaintiffs prove a causal connection between individual emitters and their climate impacts.