Dear Friend of FLOW,
Today marks the 50th anniversary of the signing of the Canada-U.S. Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement–a deep and lasting commitment between the two nations to restore and protect the greatest collection of fresh surface water on the planet.
A key institution in the execution of the Agreement is the Great Lakes Water Quality Board, which advises the International Joint Commission.
I am honored to serve as a U.S. appointee to the 28-member binational board. On this important anniversary, I am reflecting on the Board’s role under the Agreement in protecting the lakes.
Public policy rooted in scientific understanding and informed by the social and cultural context matters tremendously. It translates our values into meaningful and long-term action to change our relationship with each other and the lakes.
Has the Agreement worked? The answer: yes and no, as our companion piece describes. Yes, the Great Lakes are better off than they would be without the Agreement. But the Agreement’s 1972 goals are unfulfilled.
The biggest threat to the Great Lakes is undoubtedly climate change. It will alter the waters of the Great Lakes Basin in many ways, only some of them not foreseeable. Warming groundwater, changes in the aquatic food web, and increasing algae blooms are among the expected impacts.
Today, we still are closer to the beginning than the end of Great Lakes restoration, the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement notwithstanding.
In solidarity,
Liz Kirkwood, Executive Director
|