Copy
ADHRB Weekly Newsletter #369
View this email in your browser

Bahrain


Members of European Parliament publish letter to the High Representative strongly condemning Bahrain’s use of the death penalty

 

On 2nd October 2020, a letter signed by 15 Members of European Parliament (MEPs) was addressed to the High Representative of the European Union, Josep Borrell, citing concern over ongoing human rights violations in Bahrain and strongly condemning the country’s use of the death penalty.

Read the full letter HERE

According to the letter, 23 out of the 34 individuals sentenced to death since 2014 have alledged torture and have been subjected to unfair trials. These individuals’ convictions were politically motivated. After Bahrain ended a seven-year moratorium on the death penalty in 2017, three men were executed despite evidence of arbitrary arrest, allegations of torture and denial of appropriate legal counsel.

The letter also cited concern for the cases of Mohammed Ramadan and Hussein Moosa, who were both convicted in an unfair trial that heavily, if not entirely, relied on evidence obtained through torture. In July 2020, both mens’ death sentences were upheld by the Court of Cassation, meaning they are now at risk of imminent execution after having exhausted all other legal remedies.

International organisations and local human rights groups, including various UN bodies, publicly denounced the denial of Mr. Ramadan and Mr Moosa’s right to a fair trial.

Based on these concerns, the MEPs asked the High Representative to publicly oppose the use of the death penalty, particularly the cases of Mohammed Ramadan and Hussein Moosa, and call for the release of all political prisoners. They also requested that the High Representative use his influence to apply pressure on Bahrain and hold those responsible of torture to account. Finally, the letter demanded that the European Union establish a human rights dialogue with Bahrain and remain vigilant concerning developments in the Gulf region, urging Bahrain to fulfill its international human rights obligations.

 
Read the full article here.

 


 


 

German Parliamentary Questions Addressing Human Rights Issues in Bahrain

 

Since 2011 Members of the German Bundestag (MPs), in particular those belonging to left-wing political parties (The Left – Die Linke and The Greens – Bündnis 90/Die Grünen), have posed questions to the German government on at least forty occasions concerning the issue of arms exports and the human rights situation in Bahrain. Following the country’s 2011 pro-democracy protests, the first German parliamentary question was tabled by MP Sevim Dag˘delen on 7th of March 2011 from The Left. The question was in relation to the export of police equipment and information technology to Bahrain and other Gulf states, as well as to countries such as Libya and Yemen. The question also raised issues of training and technical assistance, which has been given to security forces with known associations to often-violent protest suppression.

The same year Saudi Arabia sent security forces in support of the Bahraini government, a government accused of ordering violent attacks on peaceful protesters. On 21st March 2011, MP Inge Höger, also from The Left, raised concerns regarding the Federal government’s relationship with Saudi Arabia. On 4th April 2011, MP Jan van Aken questioned why the German government did not stop the export of arms to Saudi Arabia despite Saudi involvement in Bahrain.

The German Bundestag database on parliamentary questions shows that between 2011 and 2012 MPs tabled questions in relation to the following topics:

  • Whether the government considered its current arms export policy to be appropriate, particularly in the light of the bloody suppression of pro-democracy protests and the deteriorating human rights situation in Bahrain.
  • The types of arms exported to Bahrain and the previously aforementioned countries.
  • How the Federal government assessed the human rights situation in Bahrain.

On  4th June 2014 The Left tabled a series of questions regarding the contradictory behaviour  of the government. They questioned why the government decided to show support for the opposition in Syria and not in Bahrain. In Bahrain the majority Shia population are largely subjugated by the Sunni al-Khalifa family and their supporters, yet the government has stayed silent with the Bharani regime remaining unreproached. However, within the framework of the Syria Recovery Trust Fund, the German government gave support to the Syrian opposition helping create administrative structures in areas of their control. Furthermore, through their contributions to the international Group of Friends of the Syrian People, further funds have been allocated to Syrian opposition forces.

 
Read the full article here.
 

Profile in Persecution

 

Profile in Persecution: Husain Najeeb Eid

 

Husain Najeeb Eid was a 22-year-old university student when he was arbitrarily detained by the Bahraini authorities. During his interrogation, he was subjected to several human rights violations. He is currently detained in Jau Prison. Husain suffers from sickle cell anemia but is denied proper health care by the prison administration. Recently, Husain was a cause for concern when he started to display some symptoms of the coronavirus disease, which can be fatal for a sickle cell anemia sufferer.

In the early hours of 29 May 2014, Husain was arrested in his own bedroom. His house was raided by riot police and masked officers wearing black clothing. No warrant was presented during his arrest. On the same day, Husain called his mother to let her know he was fine. He was then forcibly disappeared for approximately five days. During this period, his family were unable to know anything about his whereabouts and his fate. Until now, Husain’s family knows very little about what happened to him during the interrogation, which lasted almost a month. During the day, he would be interrogated and tortured at the Criminal Investigation Building in Adliya, and then he would be returned to Al-Rifaa Police Station at night.

Husain Najeeb Eid was convicted of the following charges in the Bahraini Hezbollah case: 1) possession of arms, 2) joining a terrorist organization, 3) attempted murder, 4) illegal Assembly and rioting, and 5) acquiring arms and explosives in a public place. He was sentenced to 15 years in prison and his citizenship was revoked in June 2016. No decisions were issued by the Court of Appeal nor the Court of Cassation because his parents could not afford the legal expenses.

Prior to his arrest in 2014, Husain suffered from major health complications, he also underwent operations and had consultations with specialist doctors. He suffers from sickle cell anemia disease and within prison, his condition has deteriorated. In prison, Husain has been denied adequate medical care by the prison administration. Since his arrest in 2014, he has been admitted into the hospital several times. Yet, prison officials only provide him with false promises to ensure he is provided with the necessary medical treatment, especially in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.
 

Around the Gulf

 

US – Gulf Relations: Congressional responsibility in the protection of human rights

 

The United States Constitution places Congress as a coequal branch of the Federal Government and specifically makes clear its authority to regulate and hold accountable the actions of the President, even in the field of foreign affairs. Federal statutes also lay out the mechanisms by which private arms sales can be made to foreign governments: all sales must be made by a licensed firm, approved by the Department of State (DOS) and are subject to legislation by Congress to supersede the administration’s authorization. Unfortunately, mustering the votes for a veto override is extremely difficult in an age when President Trump has such a firm stranglehold on his party, so much so that it has never been accomplished. That is not to say that Congress has not tried. Since 2017 Congress has thrice passed joint resolutions of disapprovals for arms sales in the Gulf and all three times they have been vetoed.

While leveraging arms sales is one of the most effective ways for Congress to exert its constitutional authority and have a say in matters of foreign affairs, it is far from being the only method. In the past five years 69 bills have formally been introduced in at least one house of Congress attempting to inhibit various Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states, or the U.S. relationship with them. These range from yearly resolutions introduced by Senator Wyden commemorating the anniversary of the Pearl Roundabout in Bahrain, to a bill requiring the DOS to produce yearly reports on educational material released by the Saudi Ministry of Education. While Saudi Arabia received the most scrutiny with 53 bills calling them out by name, the UAE and Bahrain, who while being smaller countries commit equally horrific human rights atrocities, also acquired fierce condemnation. A 2015 bill introduced by Representative McGovern and Senator Wyden would have halted all arms sales to Bahrain until the DOS determined that all 23 Bahrain Independent Commission of Inquiry (BICI) recommendations had been implemented. This piece of common-sense legislation did not even receive a vote in committee.

ADHRB at the UN

 

ADHRB raises attack on Freedom of Religion in Bahrain

 
On 1 October 2020, ADHRB has delivered an oral intervention at the United Nation Human Rights Council session 45 during interactive debate under item 8.
 

GCC in the Wire

 

- Turkish business groups call for Saudi action to resolve trade problems (Reuters)


ISTANBUL (Reuters) - Turkey’s leading business groups urged Saudi Arabia on Saturday to take action to improve trade relations as Turkish firms encounter growing problems in doing business with the Gulf Arab state.
 

- U.N. calls for halt to clashes near Yemen's Hodeidah port (Reuters)

ADEN (Reuters) - The United Nations on Thursday called for an immediate end to clashes near Yemen’s main port of Hodeidah after a surge in fighting that sources said have killed dozens of people despite a U.N.-sponsored ceasefire in place in the area
 

- Rights groups oppose China, Russia, Saudis on UN rights body (AP)

UNITED NATIONS (AP) — Human rights groups are urging the U.N.’s 193 member nations to oppose seats on the world organization’s premiere rights body for China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Cuba and others because of their dismal rights records — but they are all likely to win anyway.

- UN envoy condemns deadly clashes in Yemen’s key port city (AP)

CAIRO (AP) — A top U.N. official Thursday condemned recent clashes in Yemen’s strategic port city of Hodeida, which have left dozens killed and wounded, urging the country’s warring parties to immediately stop the fighting.

- Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, power behind the throne (BBC)

Few people outside Saudi Arabia had heard of Mohammed bin Salman Al Saud before his father became king in 2015. But now, the 35-year-old crown prince is considered the de facto ruler of the world's leading oil exporter.

China, Russia and Saudi Arabia set to join UN human rights council (The Guardian)


China, Russia, Cuba, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia are expected to be elected to the board of the UN human rights council on Tuesday, leaving human rights campaigners in the countries aghast and pleading with EU states to commit to withholding their support.
 
Are you a victim of a human rights abuse in Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, or other GCC states?

Document your case with the Special Procedures of the United Nations through 
ADHRB's UN Complaint Program.
Copyright © 2017 ADHRB, All rights reserved.
Twitter
Twitter
Facebook
Facebook
Website
Website
YouTube
YouTube






This email was sent to <<Email Address>>
why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences
Americans for Democracy and Human Rights in Bahrain · 1001 Connecticut Avenue NW · Suite 205 · Washington, DC 20036 · USA

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp