Copy
View this email in your browser
Facebook
Website
Email
Twitter
Dear comrade <<First Name>>

 

Please find in this bulletin:

Next LAW members’ meeting

Join us at our next members’ meeting on Saturday November 21 at 5pm on Zoom. We want to collectively discuss:

 

- How the left should oppose the suspension of Jeremy Corbyn – are calls for ‘unity’ useful or do they make the problem worse?

- The spreading of the 'anti-Zionism equals antisemitism' smear campaign into other areas of society

- Plans for our December 12 conference on 'Free Speech on Palestine/Israel, the IHRA mis-definition of antisemitism and the EHRC report (see below)

 

We want to discuss with all LAW members what this means for the future work of our campaign.

 

Please note that this meeting is for full LAW members only. We will operate a waiting room, so please sign up with the name that corresponds with your LAW membership. All LAW members will receive a Zoom invite to the meeting in the next 24 hours via email (it has also been posted in our Facebook group, which all members can apply to join here).

 

New members can sign up until November 20 here (this is also the deadline for relapsed members to sign up again).
If you are unsure if you are a member please get in touch: info@labouragainstthewitchhunt.org.


Conference on Free Speech on Palestine/Israel

Save the date: On December 12, Labour Against the Witchhunt is co-hosting a conference on 'Free Speech on Palestine/Israel, the IHRA mis-definition of antisemitism and the EHRC report’.

 

More details to follow soon, but you can already register here. Please note that you might be registered already, as we have converted our planned Counter-Conference on the Leaked Report into this event. This Counter-Conference was supposed to coincide with the publication of the findings of the Forde Enquiry, but this has now been postponed so many times, that we don’t believe it will happen anytime soon.

 

Why we need a campaign for Free Speech on Israel/Palestine

The right to free speech, especially on the subject of Israel/Palestine, is coming under immense attack all over the world. This overview is available online here.

– Universities: Education Secretary Gavin Williamson has just threatened to cut the funding of any university that refuses to adopt the ‘working definition of antisemitism’ published by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance “by the end of the year”. A recent survey by the Union of Jewish Students had shown that only 29 out of 133 universities had adopted the IHRA definition, and 80 said they had no current plans to do so. (link)

– Schools: In September, the British government instructed schools in England not to use resources from anti-capitalist organisations: “Schools should not under any circumstances use resources produced by organisations that take extreme political stances on matters. This is the case even if the material itself is not extreme, as the use of it could imply endorsement or support of the organisation.” (link)

– NGOs: The US government is threatening to label labelling a number of leading international humanitarian organisations as antisemitic after they documented Israeli rights abuses against Palestinians, including settlement building in the occupied territories. The groups include the UK-based Amnesty International and Oxfam as well as the US organisation Human Rights Watch. (link)

– BDS movement: In 2019, the German government voted to declare BDS ‘antisemitic’ (link). In the US, some states have passed anti-BDS measures, such as punishing companies that refuse to do business with illegal Israeli settlements (link). After it labelled the BDS movement as antisemitic in 2018, the city council of Vienna cancelled a lecture by Ronnie Kassrills, the Jewish South African anti-Apartheid campaigner, alongside several Palestine solidarity events by a combined vote of the Greens, Social Democrats and the neo-Nazi Freedom Party (link). When France’s highest court convicted twelve activists merely for handing out BDS leaflets, the European Court of Human Rights stepped in and overruled the verdict in June 2020, stating that this was a breach of freedom of expression, ordering the French government to pay damages to the activists (link). Still, Boris Johnson is considering introducing similar laws in Britain, which was indeed promised in the Tory’s election programme (link). A large number of local authorities have already adopted the IHRA definition. Tower Hamlets council banned a bike ride for Palestinian children meeting in a park; other councils have refused to let BDS or pro-Palestinian groups hire town buildings or stage protests.

Labour movement: The election of Jeremy Corbyn as leader of the Labour Party in 2015 unleashed a vicious campaign against him and his supporters. Anti-Zionism and support for the Palestinian struggle was wrongly equated with antisemitism, leading to the smearing of hundreds of supporters of the Palestinian struggle as antisemites. The campaign culminated in the October 29 suspension of Corbyn himself, for stating that: “One antisemite is one too many, but the scale of the problem was also dramatically overstated for political reasons by our opponents”. Like many others before him, he was punished simply for stating the plain truth.  

The fight for freedom of discussion and democratic decision-making in our movement is essential for the struggle for socialism. For this reason, we oppose demands for “zero tolerance”. This is the opposite of the culture of open debate we need. The best way to fight prejudice, misperceptions and misunderstandings is by education and free and frank debate. 

CLPD/Momentum model motion:
Misleading, dangerous and politically flawed

 

We recommend that LAW supporters do not use the joint model motions put out by CLPD and Momentum. Their first joint motion was very brief – and very wrong: it called for outright “unity” with the right. We believe that the futile attempt to appease the right is exactly what has led to the left’s defeat. In addition to this major strategic flaw, their latest model motion on democratic debate also contains a number of seriously wrong and false claims – which are bound to make the tendency for self-censorship on the left a whole lot worse.

 

1) The ‘guidance notes’ of the model motion state that branches and CLPs have been told that “they cannot discuss its [the EHRC] recommendations”. 

 

THIS IS FALSE! Evans’ guidance states that “motions or discussions that seek to question the competence of the EHRC to conduct the investigation in any way, or repudiate or reject the report or any of its recommendations are not competent business and must be ruled out of order.”

   

Surely our members are clever enough to phrase motions in a way to get around this! For example, there is no problem with motions that state, for example, “it is clear from the EHRC Report’s recommendations that the action against Jeremy is in direct conflict with its findings” or “we cannot see anything wrong with Jeremy’s response to the EHRC report.” 

 

2) Crucially, the new CLPD/Momentum model motion also feeds the misunderstanding that the classification of subjects as “not competent business” means that there is a ban on those motions: “CLPs are told they cannot debate the apparently factional suspension of Jeremy Corbyn MP”.

 

THIS IS FALSE! There is no ban! The formulation ‘not competent business’ means that the NEC and Sir Keir might not read those motions, but that’s hardly the point anyway. More details on this issue here. 

 

3) Further, the guidance notes display yet again a failure to understand that the right has no interest in unity, no matter how much we might beg them nicely for it: Labour should be “a broad church”, which needs to “represents a cross-section of political opinion on the left”.

 

THIS IS POLITICALLY SUICIDAL, as Jeremy Corbyn clearly just found out! The Corbyn leadership made the crucial mistake of not taking on the right when they had the chance. They should have cleared out the compliance unit and regional offices; they should have fought tooth and nail for open selection of MPs; they should have told the pro-Israel lobby to get lost instead of implementing one demand after the next.

 

Instead of encouraging comrades to fight, the new CLPD/Momentum model motion makes a bad situation a hundred times worse. When has groveling and asking nicely ever produced any results for the working class? We only every won concessions when we were fighting and flexing our collective muscle.

 

If you fight, you might lose – if you don’t fight you’ve lost already. Let’s swamp Labour HQ with motions from hundreds of branches and CLPs! Comrades should take inspiration from some of the much better motions that have already been passed -  here. The page also features a also a number of useful model motions.

LAW's sponsors include:
  • Alexei Sayle, comedian
  • Ken Livingstone
  • Professor Moshé Machover, Israeli socialist and founder of Matzpen
  • Ian Hodson, president of the Bakers Union
  • Ken Loach, film director
  • Noam Chomsky, author and activist
LAW’s honorary presidents are Ken Livingstone and Moshé Machover

Join or affiliate
http://www.labouragainstthewitchhunt.org/contact/

Donate:
Make donation or standing order to 
LAW, Sort code 309473 Account No 21409868
Or make a Paypal donation here
 
LAW email newsletter. Share:
https://labouragainstthewitchhunt.us8.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=209ee62bc6b5062ed8c0521ad&id=1d62cdea75
 

Contact: 
info@labouragainstthewitchhunt.org
07817 379568
LAW, BCM Box 1488, LONDON WC1N 3XX.
Facebook
Website
Email
Twitter

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.
 






This email was sent to <<Email Address>>
why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences
Labour Against the Witchhunt · BCM Box 8932 · London, England WC1N 3XX · United Kingdom

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp