Copy
Read this week's LFI Key Issues
View this email in your browser
Analysis: Can the Israeli left beat Bibi?
LFI News and Campaigns: Lisa Nandy joins ALLMEP event honouring Israeli and Palestinian peacebuilders
This Week: Hezbollah’s popularity dropping sharply in Lebanon, suggests poll; Ashrawi quits PLO executive in protest at PA resuming Israel links; European powers rap Iran as court upholds journalist’s death sentence
Essential Reading: How Israel is triggering a royal civil war in Saudi Arabia; 10 years on from Arab Spring, Gulf monarchies fill Middle East power vacuum; By adopting IHRA, universities would show leadership on tackling antisemitism; Labour NEC approves antisemitism draft action plan; Labour suspends notorious anti-Zionist activist; What Corbyn’s favourite sociologists Greg Philo and Mike Berry get wrong about contemporary antisemitism
Essential Viewing: Learn about how Israeli trade unions are backing a two-state solution
Tweet of the Week: An Israeli first
Analysis

Can the Israeli left beat Bibi?
Israel appears to be on the brink of new elections – the fourth round in less than two years – as its centre-left weighs options to prevent Benjamin Netanyahu emerging victorious.

Last week, the Knesset passed the first reading of a bill to dissolve itself. Three more votes will be needed before the bill becomes law and the parliament is dissolved. Crucially, however, the opposition parties were joined by the centrist Blue and White party and its allies in the Labor party.  

Israeli voters went to the polls in three elections which produced indecisive outcomes in April 2019, September 2019 and March 2020 before Netanyahu formed a “unity government” earlier this year which brought together elements of his previous right-wing coalition with Blue and White and Labor. 

But the coalition – which is due to see the Blue and White leader Benny Gantz become prime minister under a so-called “rotation agreement” next November – has been wracked with infighting and suspicion since its formation. 

That infighting and suspicion have now come to settle on the passage of a state budget. Under the terms of the coalition deal, the government was supposed to pass a two-year budget covering 2020 and 2021 by the summer. Netanyahu, however, reneged on the agreement and wants to pass two separate budgets covering each year. The earlier summer deadline was pushed to 23 December. If a budget isn’t passed by that date, the Knesset is automatically dissolved and elections held on 23 March.

The battle over the budget revolves around raw politics. Gantz and his allies suspect that Netanyahu is seeking to exploit a loophole in the coalition agreement which would allow him to engineer a crisis over the budget next year, bring the government down and avoid turning over the premiership. Under the deal, the only scenario – except where Blue and White itself brings down the government – under which Gantz doesn’t become prime minister is if a budget is not passed by the deadline.

“A schemer and a liar”

Although Gantz held budget talks with finance minister Israel Katz on Monday, the pair did not appear to find a way out of the current deadlock. While Gantz has left open the door to further negotiations which might save the government – “it’s either an immediate budget or elections,” he declared at the weekend – his relationship with the prime minister appears close to breaking point. Ahead of the Knesset vote last Tuesday, he declared: “Netanyahu committed to pass a budget in August, and naturally did not stand by his word. He promised that it would happen in December and is not following through. Does anyone believe him anymore? Millions of citizens stand heartbroken watching businesses they’ve built over lifetimes fall apart in front of their eyes. Business are closing, hundreds of thousands of unemployed don’t have the slightest ray of hope, while whole families are struggling to survive. And the State of Israel has no budget.” 

Since then, Gantz, who serves as defence minister, has further toughened his rhetoric, on Saturday branding Netanyahu “a schemer and a liar”. Referencing the prime minister’s corruption trial, which steps up a gear in the new year, Gantz suggested: “Even though I knew who I was getting into government with, I thought he too had limits he wouldn’t pass,” Gantz said. “I’m afraid Netanyahu is more concerned with his trial than his country.” He has also argued that “if there was no trial, there would be a budget”. 

Netanyahu’s critics have long believed he wants new elections next summer to free himself of Blue and White ministers (who, among other departments, run the Justice Ministry) and possibly pass legislation which would grant him immunity from prosecution. The prime minister is thought to be wary of spring elections, before a covid-19 vaccine arrives and the economy can begin to revive.

Polls indicate that, while Netanyahu’s Likud party is likely to emerge with the most seats in any election, thanks to the prime minister’s pandemic-hit popularity, it is likely to lose ground compared to the last occasion on which Israelis voted earlier in the year. Netanyahu also faces a potential further - possibly major - complication with the news today that Gideon Sa'ar, a former cabinet minister, is to quit Likud and form a new party. Sa'ar, who challenged Netanyahu for the leadership before the last elections, is reportedly taking a number of Likud MKs with him, and is said to be open to working with other parties. 

But Gantz’s decision to enter a coalition with Netanyahu – something he had repeatedly vowed never to do – also came at a heavy price for the former IDF chief. It first split the centrist alliance he had forged with Yair Lapid’s Yesh Atid and former Likud defence minister Moshe Ya’alon’s Telem – which both opted to remain in opposition – and then led to a sharp decline in Blue and White’s popularity. Indeed, polls show that both Netanyahu and Gatz evoke deep distrust among Israelis, with 60 percent of voters saying each has very low or moderately low credibility.

Old alliances

But a spring election may well see new contenders enter the race and a reordering of political alliances as is often the case in the run-up to Israeli elections. After their fractious divorce earlier this year, the prospects of Lapid and Gantz reuniting seem weak. “We’ll be the biggest party and the axis around which the next government is formed,” the defence minister confidently predicted last week. “There’s no possibility of working with Lapid in one faction. I need to lead the [center-left] camp, Lapid can’t form a government,” Gantz added, insisting that “only I can form a unity government. I’m willing to cooperate with anyone who will join us; I’m going ahead and people will follow me”.

Lapid, however, maintains that one centre-left party would be formed and he will lead it. “We’re the bigger party, and we’ve proved that only we can be trusted not to join forces with Netanyahu,” the opposition leader argued. He added that while he may meet with Gantz, the latest polls give Yesh Atid nearly twice the level of support as Blue and White. At the same time, Ya’alon has announced that Telem will run separately from Yesh Atid. “He feels he can attract more votes by going alone,” Lapid explained. “I think it’s a mistake, but a legitimate one.”

Gantz and Lapid’s refusal to cooperate may not turn out to be disastrous for the centre-left. A Channel 12 poll released last week showed that if Yesh Atid and Blue and White linked up, they would win 25 seats, six behind Likud but beating Yamina with its projected 21 MKs. The hard-right alliance, which is led by former defence minister Naftali Bennett, has surged during the pandemic as Netanyahu’s popularity has sunk. (Bennett, a former coalition partner of Likud, chose not to join the unity government this spring). But, if they choose to run alone, Yesh Atid and Blue and White may win a higher combined total: with Lapid’s party gaining 17 seats, while Gantz’s pockets 10. Overall, that poll showed, the parties in their current alliances would see Likud on 30 seats, Yamina 21, Yesh Atid 17, the Israeli-Arab Joint list 12, and Blue and White 10. The ultra-Orthodox UTJ and Shas would each win eight seats, while Yisrael Beitenu (led by the anti-Netanyahu maverick right-winger Avigdor Liberman) would win seven, as would the left-wing Meretz party. Labor and the far-right Jewish Home party would fail to cross the threshold. 

Labor pains

Labor has been hit hard by both its decision to join Gantz in government and the formation of Blue and White itself. The party, which, under Yitzhak Herzog secured 24 seats in the 2015 general election and came close to ejecting Netanyahu from power, has spent several years in flux. In the September 2019 general election, it allied with a fledgling centre-right party Gesher led by Orly Levy, and in March 2020 the two parties allied with Meretz. Levy then abandoned Labor and backed Netanyahu becoming prime minister immediately after the elections. When party leader Amir Peretz decided to follow Blue and White into government in April, Labor’s small Knesset faction was split. Itzik Shmuli opted to take up a cabinet post as Minister of Welfare, while Merav Michaeli fought a vigorous rearguard action against the party’s abandonment of its pledge not to join a Netanyahu-led government. Michaeli has subsequently opposed Peretz’s effort to merge Labor with Blue and White. But Blue and White has also posed something of an existential threat to Labor. As Oru Wertman, a researcher at the University of Haifa’s National Security Studies Centre, wrote last week: “Since Herzog was ousted as chairman in 2017, the Labor party has failed to be an alternative to Netanyahu and the Likud. There is no doubt that the establishment of the Blue and White Party in its unified version, which was in fact a genetic duplication of the Labor party of the 1990s, crushed Labor and took its place in the landscape of Israeli politics.” 

Saviours on the horizon?

Now, though, the centre-left is eyeing two potential saviours. Ron Huldai, a popular Labor mayor of Tel Aviv, has been suggesting since the spring that he would stand in early elections. “What is happening in Israel terrifies me. I can’t stand by,” he told the Kan public broadcaster in May. The mayor, an outspoken critic of Netanyahu, was slightly injured when he joined a demonstration against the prime minister in October. Last week’s Channel 12 poll showed that, if he chose to form an alliance with Lapid, he would boost the centrist party from 17 to 21 seats.

But much recent speculation has focused on whether Huldai, a former fighter pilot and a commander in the Israeli Air Force, might instead join up with the former IDF chief of staff Gadi Eisenkot (pictured). Eisenkot has hinted that he may through his hat into the political ring since stepping down from the military last year. He has made clear his opposition to Netanyahu’s Likud party, adopted a less hostile stance towards the Iran nuclear deal than the prime minister, and is credited with the IDF’s restrained response to the 2015-6 “knife intifada”.

Last week, a survey conducted by pollster Camil Fuchs showed a new Eisenkot-led centrist party – which was envisaged to also include Huldai and the former foreign minister Tzipi Livni – picking up 15 seats. In such a scenario, Likud would win 27 seats, Yamina 21, Yesh Atid 14 and Blue and White eight. 

Eisenkot has also been linked to Ya’alon, another former IDF chief of staff. The two men are said to believe that, together, they could draw enough support from Netanyahu to deny the prime minister victory. Indeed, last week’s Camil Fuchs poll indicated that, with Eisenkot in the race, the pro-Netanyahu parties would fall from 65 seats in the Knesset to 61 perilously close to being unable to form a government. 

But Eisenkot is thus far keeping his cards close to his chest. “I have inquiries from many parties and I meet with and talk to everyone,” he was quoted as saying at the weekend. “Nothing has been agreed yet. The decision on whether to join political life and with whom will be only be made when the election date is set.”

As Haaretz columnist Anshel Pfeffer suggested this week, given the failure of three former IDF chiefs – Blue and White’s Gantz, Ya’alon and Gabi Ashkenazi – to topple Netanyahu in the three elections during 2019-20, the current fixation on Eisenkot may appear strange. “The Israeli centre-left simply can’t wean itself from its addiction to saviour-generals,” he wrote this week. “There’s a compelling logic, after all. Netanyahu has built his enduring political success on branding the ‘left’ … as weak defeatists and Arab-loving traitors. Who better to restore the opposition’s patriotic and fighting credentials than a man who led Israel’s military?”

Pfeffer believes, however, that Eisenkot’s personal story may have more appeal than Gantz to “soft right” Mizrahi voters, who traditionally support Netanyahu but who might be persuaded to abandon the prime minister. “His parents were immigrants from Morocco and he grew up in working-class neighbourhoods in Tiberias and Eilat. Some of his close family became ultra-Orthodox over the years. Unlike most of his predecessors who served in the special forces or the elite Paratroopers Brigade, he served in a regular infantry battalion in the Golani Brigade.”

But there is, perhaps, a deeper, more structural (as opposed to ideological) reason why the centre-left has repeatedly struggled to displace Netanyahu over the past decade. As the Times of Israel’s Haviv Rettig Gur noted this week, the centre-left has proved far more fickle and less forgiving of its leaders than Israel’s right. “There is a deep-seated culture of political loyalty and solidarity on the Israeli right, and Netanyahu is only its latest beneficiary,” he wrote. His Likud party has had just four leaders since Israel’s founding in 1948. By contrast,  Labor has seen 11 leadership changes since Yitzhak Rabin’s assassination in 1995 – an average of 2.3 years a term. Moreover, as Labor’s support has dropped, centre-left voters have swung behind, and then abandoned, an ever-changing cast of parties: Kadima, Yesh Atid, Kulanu and, most recently, Blue and White. “The centre-left is unmoored, disloyal, and easily disappointed,” Rettig Gur argued. This has had damaging consequences. “Netanyahu would not be able to hold the country permanently suspended at the precipice of a new election, delaying a state budget for a year and preventing the government’s most fundamental work from getting done in a bid to cling to his seat – if Gantz’s support hadn’t evaporated as soon as he joined the new coalition,” he wrote. Of course, some argue that it is the betrayal of their promises which cause centre-left voters to jump from political ship. As Rettig Gur suggested: “Both arguments may be true, a chicken-and-egg conundrum that is likely to continue plaguing the Israeli centre-left for some time to come. The fickleness of voters drives a grab-what-you-can culture among leaders, which in turn drives voters to seek out better pastures.”

If Israeli voters head to the polls early next year, that alleged fickleness may see those opposed to Netanyahu rallying to yet another new standard-bearer. 
LFI News and Campaigns
Lisa Nandy joins ALLMEP event honouring Israeli and Palestinian peacebuilders

On 15 December, our friends at the Alliance for Middle East Peace are holding a virtual event for their global network of supporters. Among those participating in the event will be the shadow foreign secretary, Lisa Nandy. It will provide an opportunity for ALLMEP supporters to come together alongside leading politicians from the United States and Europe, as well as VIP guests from the world of entertainment, to honour ALLMEP's community of Israeli and Palestinian peacebuilders. Nandy said of her participation: "What we're trying to do is fight for the rights of people for safety, security and dignity. And also to unravel some of the harm that has been done. We want to create the context in which progress is possible." More details here.
This Week
Hezbollah’s popularity dropping sharply in Lebanon, suggests poll
Hezbollah’s popularity has dropped sharply in Lebanon – even among its core Shia supporters, a new poll has suggested.
The percentage of Shia who say they have a “very positive” opinion of Hezbollah, while still a majority, is almost 20 points lower than it was in late 2017.
“This trend almost certainly reflects increasing anger at Hezbollah’s role in the corruption, intimidation, and acute economic crisis plaguing the country, accelerated by its perceived responsibility for the devastating explosion in Beirut’s port last August,” suggested David Pollok of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy in his analysis of the poll. 
Hezbollah’s support among the Shia is still markedly higher than among Lebanon’s Christian and Sunni communities. Sixty-six percent of Shia voters continue to express a “very positive” opinion of Hezbollah – down from 83 percent in 2017 – while an additional 23 percent hold a “somewhat positive” opinion of it. By contrast, just 16 percent of Christians and eight percent of Sunnis now report even a “somewhat positive” view of Hezbollah, with around 60 percent of both communities holding a “very negative” view of the terror group, which is also a political party in Lebanon.
The survey also found broad support for the recent Lebanese-Israeli Mediterranean border talks – the first talks between the two countries in 30 years – with 70 percent of Sunnis, 67 percent of Christians and 51 percent of Shia labelling them a “positive development” and only 19 percent of all Lebanese expressing “strong” disagreement. By contrast, two-thirds of Christians and three-quarters of Sunni and Shia said they regard the recent normalisation agreements between Israel, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates as at least “somewhat” negative with around 40 percent of all groups saying they are “very” negative. The poll also found sharp divisions within Lebanon on the importance of the country having a good relationship with Iran.

Read full article
Ashrawi quits PLO executive in protest at PA resuming Israel links
Hanan Ashrawi, who rose to international fame when she headed the Palestinian delegation to the landmark 1991 Madrid peace talks, has reportedly resigned from the PLO’s Executive Committee.
Ashrawi is thought to have quit in protest at the decision of the Palestinian Authority to resume civilian and security coordination with Israel. Sources told the Al-Araby Al-Jadeed newspaper that Ashrawi “was angry with how the issue was handled”.
Her resignation, delivered in a letter to the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, has not yet received a response. However, Abbas has reportedly told Ashrawi that he doesn't intend to accept her resignation, arguing that such a decision must be made by the Palestinian National Council, which appoints PLO Executive Committee members. The secretary-general of the PLO, Saeb Erekat, died last month and Abbas had not yet named his successor. 
A member of the Palestinian Legislative Council since 1996, Ashrawi is a former PA minister of higher education and the authority’s highest-ranking female politician. The 74-year-old contracted covid-19 in October. She bitterly attacked the normalisation agreement between Israel, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates which was reached in the summer.
The PA cut off civilian and security cooperation with Israel in protest at Benjamin Netanyahu’s plans to annex West Bank settlements and the strategically important Jordan Valley. Netanyahu subsequently abandoned the plans as part of the Abraham Accords. In tandem with the resumption of civilian and security cooperation with Israel, the PA has also decided to once again begin accepting tax transfers. Under the terms of the Oslo Accords, Israel and the PA formed a customs union and Israel collects VAT, import duties and other taxes on the PA’s behalf, transferring the sums monthly. Last week, Israel released $725m in funds it had been holding. This should ease the fiscal squeeze which saw the PA slash public sector salaries by 50 percent.

Read full article
European powers rap Iran as court upholds journalist’s death sentence
Britain, France and Germany this week issued a warning to Iran after Tehran announced plans to install additional, advanced uranium-enriching centrifuges and potentially expand its nuclear programme. 
The warning came as the country’s supreme court upheld a death sentence on a journalist the regime claims helped fuel unrest on social media during the widespread and violently suppressed 2017 anti-government protests.
“If Iran is serious about preserving a space for diplomacy, it must not implement these steps,” the European powers, who along with the US, China and Russia, reached the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran. The Trump administration withdrew the US from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action in 2018 and imposed sanctions on Iran. Iran, in turn, has repeatedly breached the terms of the accord. 
The Reuters news agency said it has seen a confidential International Atomic Energy Agency report which said Iran plans to install three more cascades, or clusters, of advanced IR-2m centrifuges in its enrichment plant at Natanz, which was built underground apparently to withstand any aerial bombardment.
“Iran’s recent announcement to the IAEA that it intends to install an additional three cascades of advanced centrifuges at the Fuel Enrichment Plant in Natanz is contrary to the [2015 agreement] and deeply worrying,”  the European states said. They also criticised a new law passed by the Iranian parliament last week which bans UN inspections of nuclear sites and seeks to expand enrichment beyond the limits set by the JCPOA.
Ruhollah Zam, a Paris-based dissident journalist, was convicted of “corruption on earth” by an Iranian court in June. He ran the Amadnews website, a popular anti-government forum which Iran says incited the 2017-18 protests against corruption, austerity and the lack of democracy. It remains unclear how Iran came to arrest Zam who had left the country after he was imprisoned in 2009.

Read full article
Essential Reading

How Israel is triggering a royal civil war in Saudi Arabia
Elie Podeh 

10 years on from Arab Spring, Gulf monarchies fill Middle East power vacuum
Aziz el Massassi

By adopting IHRA, universities would show leadership on tackling antisemitism
Kate Green

Labour NEC approves antisemitism draft action plan
Lee Harpin

Labour suspends notorious anti-Zionist activist
Lee Harpin

What Corbyn’s favourite sociologists Greg Philo and Mike Berry get wrong about contemporary antisemitism
Matthew Bolton
Tweet of the Week
FOLLOW US
Twitter
Facebook
Website
Email

Our mailing address is:
mail@lfi.org.uk

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list
 






This email was sent to <<Email Address*>>
why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences
Labour Friends of Israel · BM LFI · London, London WC1N 3XX · United Kingdom

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp