Copy
February 2021
View this email in your browser

Dear <<First Name>>,

Welcome to the February edition of Landlord and Tenant E-lert
 
The issues in this month’s articles are:
 
Article 1: Does the stripping out of landlord’s fixtures mean that a tenant has failed to deliver up vacant possession?
 
Article 2: What are the consequences of inadvertently granting a lease with the protection of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954?
 
Article 3: If you are registered as joint owner of a property, does that always mean you have an interest in it?
 
Article 4: Is a landlord liable for a personal fine as well as a corporate fine against his company when in breach of licensing legislation?
 
I hope that you find these articles helpful
 
Best regards
 
Rex

High Court Ruling on Vacant Possession and Landlord’s Fixtures
When exercising a break clause in a commercial lease, tenants are usually required to deliver up a property with vacant possession – but what exactly does that mean?
READ MORE...

 
Contested Business Lease Renewal Case on a Racing Stable
A landowner almost fell into a trap of an unwanted tenant moving into this newly built home when he inadvertently created a lease which was protected by the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954.
READ MORE...

 
High Court Rules on Son’s Interest in Jointly Owned Property
The case concerned a father who, on the face of it, purchased his home jointly with his eldest son.
READ MORE...

 
Court of Appeal Rules on Personal and Corporate Fines under Licensing Legislation
The case concerned an office block that had been converted into 47 flats. After a housing officer visited, the local authority employed its powers under the Housing Act 2004 to serve a number of improvement notices on the company that owned the block’s freehold.
READ MORE...

 
Email
LinkedIn
Website
Twitter
Copyright © 2021 Rex Cowell Law, All rights reserved.