New York school boards and village governments flunk transparency tests
Only 30% of school districts in New York State received a passing grade for how they conducted executive sessions. And half of the state's villages received an "F" grade for providing meeting minutes, agendas, documents and public comments.
Those are the findings of surveys released this year by the New York Coalition for Open Government. Coalition members reviewed the websites of 20 districts for the schools report, released in February. Coalition members reviewed the sites of 20 villages in the state for the group's latest report, released Thursday during a press conference.
The all-volunteer, nonpartisan coalition strives to release several report cards each year. Its next study, targeted for a May release, will focus on local planning boards.
Read the reports here:
• School Boards Across New York State Hold Improper Executive Sessions.
• Village Governments Across New York State Provide Limited Information to the Public.
States respond differently to releasing body-cam footage, but trend is toward more disclosure
Most states have passed legislation to address the public release of footage captured by police body-worn cameras. And, generally, states are trending toward increased public disclosure of footage.
Do existing FOIA laws and their exemptions address body-camera footage? That answer varies by state. But an increasing number of states have required automatic public disclosure of footage under certain circumstances.
Those are some of the findings of a study commissioned by the DC Open Government Coalition to assess and compare state laws and proposals governing police body-worn cameras.
Read the report here:
• Executive Summary: State and Local Policies Regarding Public Access to Police Body-Worn Camera Videos.
• Body Camera Research Table.
• Access to Police Complaint Records.
|
|
The NFOIC joined other organizations in urging the Biden Administration to promote transparency and openness:
• Letter to Biden White House on Open Government.
• Request for Swift Presidential Leadership to Make Transparency a Top Priority for the Biden Administration.
Also of note, the Indiana Supreme Court deadlocked on a case about revealing the identities of the state's execution drugs, which a requester sought under the state's Access to Public Records Act. The split in the state's top court means a lower court's ruling to release the information remains intact.
Last year, the NFOIC signed on to an amicus brief, drafted by the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and the Society of Professional Journalists. The brief argued that a "Secrecy Statute," meant to conceal the identities of the execution drugs, was unconstitutional. Read more about the case here: Indiana high court splits over revealing execution drugs.
|
|
|
From our 2020 FOI Summit,
a discussion about using public funds to incentivize businesses.
|
|
This newsletter is produced by Todd Fettig, NFOIC outreach coordinator, and Erika Benton, NFOIC external partnership coordinator and communications specialist. To contribute items or for more information, email nfoic@nfoic.org, tfettig@nfoic.org and ebenton@nfoic.org. To read regular FOI updates, visit our blog at nfoic.org and follow us on Twitter, Facebook or Instagram.
|
|
|
|
|