Copy
Share Share
Tweet Tweet
Forward Forward
April 8, 2021
*******

Assassination of Berta Caceres: Follow The Money to the Atala Family
U$1,254,000 payment from Atala family to David Castillo, two days before March 2, 2016 assassination of Berta Caceres

https://mailchi.mp/rightsaction/assassination-of-berta-caceres-follow-the-money-to-the-atala-family
 
******

DAY TWO: Trial Against David Castillo, Co-Author of Berta Cáceres's Murder
By Karen Spring, April 7, 2021, https://www.aquiabajo.com/blog/2021/4/7/day-two-trial-against-david-castillo-co-author-of-berta-cceress-murdera
 
Main Points of the Day
 
Follow The Money to the Atala Family
The lawyers (acusador privado) representing Berta Cáceres’s family present additional evidence including documents outlining a bank transfer for over $1,254,000 USD authorized by DESA’s Chief Financial Officer, Daniel Atala, to Pemsa, the company directed by David Castillo (see pictures published by COPINH).
 
 
The date of the bank transfer is February 29, 2016 and the money is suspected to be direct evidence of payments made and authorized by DESA executives [– the Atala family, in particular -] to Castillo, who then gave money to now-convicted murderer, Douglas Bustillo, while discussing plans to carry out some sort of action around the date of the bank transfer and just days before Berta Cáceres was murdered.
 
The defense asked the judges to recuse themselves from the case. The court ruled that the trial will be suspended until the Appeals Court rules on the defense’s motion. [NOTE: This is the fourth time that the defense has attempted to recuse the judges. Lawyer Victor Fernandez predicts that the Appeals court will rule within the next few days and if denied, the trial could continue next week]
 
To accompany the above photo, published by COPINH, COPINH writes: “Lawyers for Berta Cáceres’s family present proof about the payments made by Daniel Atala to David Castillo that coincide with conversations to coordinate the logistics of the criminal structure [that murdered Berta Cáceres].”
 
To announce this recently revealed evidence, COPINH and the legal team held a press conference outside of the court.
 
More Details:
General Contextual Information
Today, the Jitsi platform was used to broadcast the trial over Facebook instead of through a cell phone with poor audio and video quality. However, the audio was just as difficult to hear.
 
At the starting of today’s proceedings, Castillo’s defense attorneys complained again, like in previous hearings, about the camera angle of the live broadcast. In previous occasions, the defense argued that this puts them at risk and asked to have the angle moved. Today, the camera was moved to focus on the backs of the prosecutors and facing the ‘private accusers’ (acusadores privados) representing the Cáceres family.
 
Upon being denied entry into the courtroom yesterday, Laura Zúniga presented a letter to the court regarding her ability as a victim, to be physically present in the courtroom throughout the trial.
 
Prosecutors Present and Clarify Additional Evidence
The defense clarified details about evidence that will be used in the trial as well as presents additional forms of evidence. This includes:
  • Notifying the court of an error of the names of two technical consultants (consultores técnicos) that will ratify a legal document pertaining to the removal or collection of evidence (acta de levantamiento)
  • Presented physical evidence involving two cell phones (one black and one blue) that were seized from David Castillo. The cell phones are referred to in a document presented as evidence and part of an expert witness analysis.
  • Proposed a document outlining the data extraction of an LG phone that contained a voice message sent on March 31, 2016. The LG phone was obtained on April 30 ,2016. This piece of evidence is important in establishing the line of investigation carried out by Honduran investigators but was then discontinued because the information was manipulated. The document will be ratified by an expert witness. This document is part of an investigation carried out by the Office of the Special Prosecutor for the Prosecution of Officials of the Justice System and an indictment presented against police investigators. A copy of the acceptance of the expert witness, Emerson Moises Andino, who will analyze the cell phone was also presented.
  • Presents a technical consultant, Jose Eduardo Sierra, who will provide a technical analysis of an electronic data extraction in response to an analysis or expert witness testimony by Jonathan Murillo Maradiaga, who was presented by the defense.
  • Requests the court to formally cite two witnesses to testify - protected witness AAA who the prosecutors have been unable to locate, and Lilian Esperanza.
  • Presents Oscar Rodriguez, a technical consultant who will conduct an analysis of the expert witness testimony to be presented by Antonio Matamoros Cruz who was presented to testify by the defense to analyze data extracted from the LG phone.
Private Accusers Present and Clarify Additional Evidence
The private accusers (lawyers representing the Cáceres family) do not object to the evidence clarified or presented by the prosecutors.
 
Lawyers representing Salvador Zúniga (Berta Cáceres’s son):
  • Object to an expert witness presented by the defense arguing that the correct procedure was not followed. The defense alleged that the expert witness was threatened without providing proof and therefore, presented a document completed by the witness but without following the correct procedure.
  • Present an expert report written by expert Gladys Tzul called: ‘An Analysis of the situation and Condition of Violence Faced by Indigenous Women …” The private accusers argue that the expert testimony is relevant because it provides a scientific perspective about the motive of Berta Cáceres’s assassination and to outline the link between her status of being a woman and the planning and execution of her murder. The report also addresses the type of relationship between Castillo and Berta which is relevant considering that both are the main subjects of the trial and that the defense is attempting to argue that Castillo could not have committed the murder because he had a friendship with Berta.
The court clarified whether the expert had been sworn in. She has been sworn in and her report was submitted digitally to the court.
 
Lawyers representing Berta and Laura Zúniga and Austra Berta Flores:
  • Present a document dated February 6, 2019 that establishes the legal role of David Castillo in private company Pemsa (Potencia y Energía de Mesoamerica, S.A.). The relevance of this document is outlined in the second piece of evidence outlined below. [NOTE: Pemsa is a Panama-registered company that is one of the two major shareholders of DESA. Castillo is the President of Pemsa and also of DESA. The other major shareholder of DESA is the company Inversiones Las Jacarandas, owned by the Atala Zablah family.]
  • Presents documents including evidence of a bank transfer requested by Daniel Atala, DESA’s Chief Financial Officer, to PEMSA on February 29, 2016 for approximately $1,254,000 USD. The documents also included another document dated September 11, 2012, that outlines the legal authorities granted to David Castillo including the ability to request loans, sign contracts, make deposits, etc. as Director of Pemsa. This evidence is relevant because it links to and connects with:
    • Chat messages and conversations extracted as evidence, between Douglas Bustillo and David Castillo that were discussing a plan to murder Berta Cáceres. Castillo refers to his ability to provide loans to Bustillo in a meeting held in person in Tegucigalpa. These conversations occurred on or around the date of the bank transfer to Pemsa. Castillo confirmed the transaction of money when speaking to Bustillo and Castillo later gave money to Bustillo at least one day before Berta was murdered. [NOTE: Douglas Bustillo worked as head of DESA’s security. He was convicted in December 2018 for Berta Cáceres’s murder]
    • The bank transfer was requested by Daniel Atala who used a DESA institutional email (datala@desa.hn) to confirm the transaction.
  • Presents an expert report written by expert witness Harald Waxenecker titled: “Analysis of Roberto David Castillo Mejía’s position of corporate-institutional power and his involvement with the planning, coordination, and execution of Berta Cáceres’s murder". The expert specializes in understanding networks of corporate corruption and show that Castillo’s institutional power obtained through his positions inside the National Electrical Energy Company (ENEE) and the Armed Forces, to harass Berta Cáceres. Waxenecker had already been accepted and sworn in by the court.
  • Requests the court to confirm whether Daniel Atala, who had been proposed by the private accusers and accepted by the court to testify, had been cited to appear. The court secretary confirms that Daniel Atala was notified on March 24, 2021 and that Atala’s private attorney confirmed that he would be testifying.
  • Presents the expert reports written by expert witness Andrés Arrieta, who will analyze telecommunications and the organizational structure that led to Berta’s murder.
Defense Asks Judges to Recuse Themselves (Again)
Arguing that the court has previously heard the evidence presented in this trial (referring to the case heard by the same court that led to the conviction of the seven individuals for Berta’s murder), and that the judges have a personal issue against the defense and it’s request made yesterday, the defense presented a request for the judges to recuse themselves from the case. [NOTE: This will be the fourth time that the defense has made such request and the fourth time that the same request will be sent to the Appeals Court].
 
Response of the Prosecutors to Defense’s Request
Argue that the defense is trying to provoke the prosecutors and the judges by making accusations against their professionalism and morals - provocations that have not resulted in either falling into their trap. Reminds the court that the same requests have been made previously and were denied by the Appeals court. Mentions that they are grateful that the hearing is being publicly broadcasted so that everyone could witness what is occurring in the trial. Argues that the defense is using irregular tactics to “painfully delay” the legal process. Reminds the court that the defense can be fined for these tactics and that the prosecutors have nothing personal against Castillo.
 
Response of the Private Accusers to Defense’s Request:
Argues that this is a delay tactic. The courts have already responded to such requests.
The judges leave to deliberate. Within an hour, the resolution is given.
 
Court Resolution to the Defense’s Recusal Request
The request will be sent to the Appeals court and the trial will be suspended until the Appeals court rules. [NOTE: Victor Fernandez, one of the lawyers representing Berta and Laura Zúniga and Berta’s mother, Berta Austra Flores, stated in a press conference held by COPINH outside the court that the Appeals court could respond within dates and that it’s possible that the trial will continue next week.]

Karen Spring reports:
https://www.aquiabajo.com
https://twitter.com/springkj

 
*******

More information
 
Archives – COPINH & Berta Caceres
Over 20 years of Rights Action archives related to work in support of COPINH: https://rightsaction.org/archcopinh
 
Book: Who killed Berta Cáceres? Behind the brutal murder of an environment crusader
By Nina Lakhani, 2 Jun 2020, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/02/who-killed-berta-caceres-behind-the-brutal-of-an-environment-crusader
 
Inside The Plot To Murder Honduran Activist Berta Cáceres
Text and WhatsApp messages show that the conspiracy against Berta Cáceres reached the highest ranks of the company whose dam she had been protesting.
By Danielle Mackey, Chiara Eisner, December 21 2019, The Intercept
https://theintercept.com/2019/12/21/berta-caceres-murder-plot-honduras/
 
Films & videos: Berta Caceres
 
The Life and Death of Berta Cáceres (2020)
In 2016, environmental activist Berta Cáceres was shot dead in her home in Honduras. This film by Trocaire features interviews with Bérta's daughter, sister and mother.
https://vimeo.com/390771524
 
Berta Cáceres: In Her Own Words / En sus proprias palabras
Based on a 2012 interview we did with the Honduran environmental activist and co-founder of the Council of Indigenous People’s Organizations of Honduras (COPINH).
https://skylight.is/2016/03/berta-caceres-in-her-own-words
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjM81tYBew4
 
Berta Cáceres, Goldman Environmental Prize (April 19, 2015)
In a country with growing socioeconomic inequality and human rights violations, Berta Cáceres rallied the indigenous Lenca people of Honduras and waged a grassroots campaign that successfully pressured the world’s largest dam builder to pull out of the Agua Zarca Dam. She is the South & Central America winner of the 2015 Goldman Environmental Prize, the world's largest award for grassroots environmental activists.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zh9Sn9oJR94&feature=youtu.be
 
Berta Caceres acceptance speech, 2015 Goldman Prize ceremony (2015)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AR1kwx8b0ms&feature=youtu.be%C2%A0
 
Berta's Daughters Speak (2019)
Berta Cáceres was killed for defending the river on which Indigenous communities depend. Her daughters continue that struggle, despite the risks – as witnessed in this Amnesty International interview.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sMdXkXR7U6k&feature=youtu.be
 
Austra Berta Flores, mother of Berta Caceres, speaks
Calling on international community to demand the full truth, so that those who paid and ordered the murder of her daughter be prosecuted.
https://oxfam.app.box.com/s/ygf6fvlpl9fg08znt7irav78jjp44lz1
 
Assassination of Berta Caceres: repression, impunity, corruption & profitable businesses in Honduras (April 4, 2017)
Wide Angle interview with Grahame Russell about assassination of Berta Caceres; the U.S. and Canadian backed 2009 military coup; U.S. and Canadian business interests with the post-military coup regimes; why so many Hondurans flee to the U.S., year after year.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVMsJyMIlRw&t=83s&list=PLztbi9KA9roUoj_SKm_cehOB_LWo9uTFW&index=25
 
Dos años después de su asesinato, Berta Cáceres no se murió, se multiplicó (Febrero 2018)
https://www.franceameriquelatine.org/6370-2/
 
Honduras: Blood and the Water (September 2016)
AlJazeera Faultlines 25 minute report on assassination of Indigenous, anti-imperialist, feminist, environmental activist Berta Caceres.
http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/faultlines/2016/09/honduras-blood-water-160920064355648.html
 
Berta Vive (2016)
On March 2016, the assasination of Berta Cáceres shook the world. Gustavo Castro, Mexican environmental activist witnessed the crime and survived the horror of that night but was then trapped in Honduras. The defense against the construction of a dam at the Gualcarque River is the preface to this story. We follow Miriam Miranda, leader of the Garífuna people as well as a friend and comrade of Berta. Both women share the struggle for decolonization in a country that is being sold to transnational capital and where death is delivered in so many different ways.
https://vimeo.com/229310580
 
4 Years Seeking Justice (January 17, 2020)
Democracy Now interview with a daughter of assassinated Indigenous leader Berta Cáceres
https://www.democracynow.org/2020/1/17/berta_caceres_laura_caceres_interview

 
*******

Tax-Deductible Donations (Canada & U.S.)
To support land, human rights and environmental defender groups in Honduras and Guatemala, and COVID and hurricane relief work, make check to "Rights Action" and mail to:
  • U.S.:  Box 50887, Washington DC, 20091-0887
  • Canada:  (Box 552) 351 Queen St. E, Toronto ON, M5A-1T8
Credit-Card Donations: http://rightsaction.org/donate/
Donations of securities in Canada and the U.S.? Write to: info@rightsaction.org
 
 
Facebook Facebook
Twitter Twitter
Website Website
Copyright © 2021 Rights Action, All rights reserved.


unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences 

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp