The Fruit Salad Therapy Tapes: Tape 13
Zoinks! This week’s intro paragraph has a spooky ghost theme! Welcome, kids, to this haunted house-on-the-hill (newsletter) called Spooky Bone Manor (the Fruit Salad Therapy Tapes), a weekly spooktacular hauntfest (interactive notebook project) from crusty old janitor-in-a-rubber-mask-of-a-spooky-goblin (comedian) Joz Norris. If you’re knees are knocking (you’ve had enough of this newsletter) then you can make a leg for it (unsubscribe) any time. But if you’re still in the gang (subscribed), then let’s hunt some ectoplasm! (read the newsletter)
Post-Script To Tape 12
I really loved reading your responses to last week’s Tape. In particular, a couple of writers got in touch who said they were interested to read my thoughts on trying to remove myself from my writing because they were actually in the middle of the opposite journey, of trying to inject more of their own thoughts and feelings and experiences into their writing instead of always writing about external things. This was really interesting to think about - I would never want this newsletter to be an attempt for me to impose on other creative people how they “should” be working or thinking, or what direction they should be moving in, but I enjoyed thinking about those twin journeys and wondering if there’s an optimum point to arrive at in the middle for really great comic writing. Maybe really great comic writing needs to have some sense of authorship in there, some sense of the voice and mind behind it, but that identity needs to come through in a way that doesn’t just serve the writer’s ego by going “Hi, this is me, and you’re gonna love what I’ve got to say.” And of course every writer is going to start their journey in a different place - some will start from a point of ego and thinking all their writing has to place themselves at the centre (ahem), and will need to work backwards, and others will start from the opposite place, of trying to resist putting any of themselves in their writing and gradually move forwards as they find ways to let their writing reflect their own thoughts and ideas. Perhaps we’ll all meet in the middle one day and make our best works! It’s fun getting there in the meantime, though.
Avoiding Certainty
While I’m talking about the idea of not letting this newsletter be an attempt to tell other people what they “should” be doing, all this brings me quite neatly onto this week’s thoughts. This week’s question, which as ever I’d love to hear your thoughts on if you’re happy to share them with me, is this:
In what circumstances do you feel like you know what you’re talking about? Are there ANY circumstances that make you feel like that? Is it a feeling you enjoy?
I actually found last week’s newsletter quite tricky to write, because I think it’s the first time I’ve allowed this newsletter to be a place where I was imparting some sort of advice of my own. I certainly don’t think the thoughts I explored last week were in any way prescriptive, but it’s the first time I had essentially said “Here’s something I’ve learned from my years of pursuing comic writing, and perhaps that lesson will be useful for you.” Generally I try to let this newsletter be a place to explore ideas inconclusively, and to hear what sort of thoughts they spark in you guys, because that’s how I prefer to go about the business of creating stuff. I like to explore, and then try, and then fail, and then learn, much more than I like to impart, or advise, or instruct. And then last week something happened which really crystallised a lot of this in my head.
I had a short guest spot on Mark Watson’s third Watsonathon, his 24-hour marathon livestream shows which combine silly games and collaborative challenges and art endurance tests and chat and stand-up and the like. I popped down to the Bill Murray to take Mark through his paces with a livestreamed version of blind man’s buff as a homage to I’m A Celebrity Get Me Out Of Here, which Adam Larter was reconstructing out of cardboard over the 24 hours. As soon as I sat down to chat to Mark and to Tim Key and introduce the game, I was struck by the extent to which I had completely forgotten how to just be funny in a given moment. I’ve done virtually no live performance over the last year, and have felt more and more distant from it, and couldn’t for the life of me remember what sort of viewpoint or persona I used to adopt in order to seize hold of a moment and do something funny with it. Mark and Tim jumped onto my game and were absolutely fantastic and turned it into a really fun bit of collaborative, chaotic nonsense, and I was very pleased that I managed to inject a memorable bit of fun into the show, but I was also struck by how reliant I was on the two of them taking my idea and seizing it, and how powerless I felt to present it in a funny way myself.
All this has got me thinking a lot about certainty and uncertainty - of course, Mark and Tim have done a lot more live stuff over the last year than I have, so are comparatively less out-of-practice, not to mention the fact that they’ve both been doing comedy for decades and are two of the best comedians in the country, whereas I am very much still just a guy bumbling along and figuring stuff out. But that’s the centre of what I wanted to talk about this week - I think live comedy thrives on a certainty of viewpoint. A really great comedian knows their persona, knows their outlook on life, knows the comedic stance they need to adopt, inside-out, so that they can jump on anything that happens in a room and explore it through the prism of that mindset and turn it into a funny shared experience. I don’t know if I ever really managed to find that certainty in myself when I was performing live - as I’ve said before in this newsletter, my most successful show masqueraded as an anarchic, spontaneous show but was actually precisely scripted and choreographed to a series of pieces of music. And I certainly think that certainty of viewpoint has dwindled over the last year or so, to the extent that even if I did successfully recall what my comic voice was circa 2019 and started trying to engage with it in a live environment again, I would find that it no longer reflected how I currently feel. I would sort of have to find it again from scratch. I don’t say any of this from a self-pitying stance of “Oh, poor me, I’ve forgotten how to be funny,” because I think what I’ve always been good at is creating specific environments in which I do know how to be funny - writing specific characters, or specific stories or shows or scripts in which I know the boundaries and how to play with them, and I can make something funny happen. That’s why I’ve maintained a focus on making long-form narrative stuff over the last year instead of trying to perform live. But I don’t know if I ever arrived at a point of knowing “This is who I am, and as long as I am this person, I’m always going to know what this person thinks and feels about something in any given moment.” In fact, I think I’ve spent several years trying to accept, and even engender, a spirit of uncertainty in my life - to accept the fact that my knowledge, my awareness, my understanding of my life and the lives of those around me is partial, and always will be.