Copy
View this email in your browser
Share Share
Tweet Tweet
Share Share
ALERT: Support FTC Ban on Non-Compete Clauses That Trap Physicians and Patients

Hospitals and other corporate entities that increasingly employ physicians, like insurance companies, too often trap physicians and their patients by coercing doctors to sign anti-competitive non-compete clauses. 

In short, these harmful contract terms prohibit medical professionals from leaving an employer without giving up their ability to continue practicing medicine, for a competing hospital or even as an independent clinician. Nearly half of physicians are bound by a non-compete clause, according to various reports.

This means that even when physicians feel the hospital, insurance company, or corporation that employs them hampers their ability to treat patients to the best of their ability, or endangers patient safety, they are essentially coerced to stay and keep quiet, or give up their patients and the practice of medicine in their community.

The good news is that many states are beginning to pass legislation prohibiting non-compete clauses, and there are even bipartisan sponsors for federal legislation to do the same. Even the American Medical Association agrees that noncompete agreements “restrict competition, can disrupt continuity of care, and may limit access to care." The vast majority of physicians surveyed concur that removal of non-compete clauses would improve the overall medical care of patients.

Now the Federal Trade Commission is taking action as well by proposing to ban employers from imposing non-compete restrictions. The FTC is soliciting public comments on the proposal until March 10, 2023. It is crucial that medical professionals and patients speak out in support of the ban, because the special interests with deep pockets, like hospital systems, that benefit from non-compete clauses are fiercely lobbying to stop the FTC proposal.

Please take a few minutes today to submit a public comment to the FTC in support of the commissions proposed ban.

You can modify and submit a template public comment with just a couple clicks at the following link: https://p2a.co/4yCHRtb

If you have experienced harm due to non-compete clauses, please feel free to personalize the template message to share your story.

(NOTE: comments submitted are publicly viewable at regulations.gov and will include your name and state but not your contact information. If you prefer to submit a comment anonymously, use the regulations.gov portal by clicking here and select the "anonymous" option. A template message you can copy and paste into the this portal is provided below.)

Thank you for speaking out! Your voice makes a difference. ~AAPS



TEMPLATE COMMENT:

I support the FTC proposed rule banning non-compete clauses. 

Hospitals and other facilities Americans depend on for care abuse non-compete clauses to the detriment of patients and the medical professionals who care for them. 

Contracts that prohibit medical professionals from caring for their patients outside of corporate employment are not only unethical and anti-competitive, but are dangerous to patients.  

For example, non-competes result in patients losing access to the physicians who know them best, deter physicians from speaking out about patient safety concerns, and increase the cost of medical care by thwarting competition.

The bottom line is that non-compete clauses are bad medicine. I urge the FTC to adopt the proposal to ban them.
Copyright © 2023 AAPS, All rights reserved.


Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.